1 posted on
11/03/2002 11:07:26 AM PST by
Dubya
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Dubya
Navarro said determining whether a voter is dead is much more complicated than the study indicates and said Rutledge intended to cast doubt on the elections department. Where to start....
2 posted on
11/03/2002 11:09:45 AM PST by
sawsalimb
To: Dubya
Republicans are the anti-corspe-ite party
4 posted on
11/03/2002 11:17:21 AM PST by
lelio
To: Dubya
they're trying to intimidate the voters. And exactly which voters would be intimidated by this? Dead ones? Doubtful.
To: Dubya
I can hear the talking heads rhetoric, now. "The Republicans want to disenfranchise the dead!" and the morons over at DU will repeat it with scandalous tones like the good little useful idiots they are.
To: Dubya
dating back to 1982 They've only had twenty years to start correcting this problem... gee, give them some time!
To: Dubya
Typical demon rat response. "Oh, you're trying to stop the rats' fraud? You are 'intimidating' voters!"
To: Dubya
14 posted on
11/03/2002 11:33:21 AM PST by
Dubya
To: Dubya
Navarro said determining whether a voter is dead is much more complicated than the study indicates Only a true Democrat could come up with something like that.
20 posted on
11/03/2002 11:50:57 AM PST by
FITZ
To: Dubya
"It's to smear the integrity of the elections department, but they're not only doing that," she said. "They're smearing the integrity of the secretary of state's office and if they're trying to intimidate the voters. That is wrong." How do you intimidate dead or ineligible voters?
21 posted on
11/03/2002 11:51:26 AM PST by
hattend
To: Dubya
Gee, dead is dead, and they need to check the vets list of patients...they might find some of those registered to vote also!
26 posted on
11/03/2002 12:19:50 PM PST by
D. Miles
To: Dubya
Does that election office not recieve monthly a list of deaths for their area from the state office of stats? I'm sure no one ever thought of reading the obits and creating a list from that! Gives new meaning to the term "Dead and stinking!"
28 posted on
11/03/2002 12:22:50 PM PST by
D. Miles
To: Dubya
"Navarro said determining whether a voter is dead is much more complicated than the study indicates and said Rutledge intended to cast doubt on the elections department."Ummm...if they've got a death certificate and have been buried for ten years, that's usually a pretty good indication they're dead.
For some reason, that commercial parody on Rush, "Night of the Voting Dead" comes to mind...
To: Dubya
CLICK ABOVE
32 posted on
11/03/2002 1:49:07 PM PST by
Dubya
To: Dubya
The study indicates that 4,223 people on the county's voter rolls - including 227 who are shown to have voted in the March primary - are probably dead
Huh ? The only thing I can think of is:
"Dead" is like Paul Wellstone, "Probably Dead" is like Frank Luatenberg & Fritz Mondale
To: Dubya
"Republicans say 16,000 registered Hidalgo County voters are ineligible or dead"I guess this headline isn't redundant, because there are voters who vote by absentee ballot but die before election day. So they are dead yet eligible to vote. A little known fact with which to dazzle your friends and win bar bets.
To: Dubya
"It's to smear the integrity of the elections department, but they're not only doing that," she said. "They're smearing the integrity of the secretary of state's office and if they're trying to intimidate the voters. That is wrong."Oh - Yeah.
Repeat after me:
Democratic key words: "Republicans are trying to intimidate the voters" Let us repeat this [hrase endlessly every time so the media repeats it every time.
Republican key word: "Let's all just get along. We want a (Another) "bipartisan" investigation into (democratic) voter fraud."
We will not publicize this (latest) case of democratic voter fraud.
Or we might be accused of intimidting illegal/imooral/cheating/dead/un-registered/felons/multiple-democratic voters...
To: Dubya
bump
39 posted on
11/04/2002 8:07:11 AM PST by
GOPJ
To: Dubya
You know, we have to be smarter about what the 'RATS will do. We know they are going to object to anything resembling sanity, so this list should have been broken up into two parts- the DEAD PEOPLE list (let them try to defend their objection to that) and then the 'ineligable' list. They will focus on that, and obscure the fact that DEAD PEOPLE VOTE in their local elections...
40 posted on
11/04/2002 8:10:30 AM PST by
Mr. K
To: Dubya; sawsalimb; Prince Caspian; Blood of Tyrants; Republic of Texas; Pookie Me; D. Miles; ...
"As in the past....We're 'counting' on youRemember....vote EARLY...and vote OFTEN!!!"
To: Dubya
Hidalgo is right smack on the Mexican border. Mexican style corruption oozes northward.
46 posted on
11/05/2002 11:12:09 AM PST by
dennisw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson