Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

These results were announced by Tim Russert this morning on "Meet The Press."
1 posted on 11/03/2002 9:01:55 AM PST by Ed_in_LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: Ed_in_LA
He is dead wrong on Allard.
2 posted on 11/03/2002 9:04:35 AM PST by Galtoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
Zogby counts the dead and other fraud used by Democrats.

Who knows? Even with their stolen hundreds of FBI files,
and their abuse of the courts to take the votes from citizens,
some small iota of their fraud may be caught this time.

4 posted on 11/03/2002 9:05:00 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
I doubt them all
5 posted on 11/03/2002 9:05:43 AM PST by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
He's smoking crack. Not a single poll in Texas shows the race being ANYWHERE near that tight.

Cornyn in a cakewalk.

6 posted on 11/03/2002 9:06:37 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
give +5 to every Republican and you've got a better picture.
7 posted on 11/03/2002 9:06:47 AM PST by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
Zogby has hit the "sauce" again.
9 posted on 11/03/2002 9:07:08 AM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative_2001; Coop; rightwingbob; DeaconBenjamin; Congressman Billybob; Vis Numar; mwl1; ...
Poll Ping!

Due to FR being down all morning, I was unable to post all the individual polls (nor will I have time to do so). Here's a listing of all the new polls since last night, though:

AL Governor; Univ. of Alabama-Birmingham
Riley 47, Siegelman 39

AL Senate; Univ. of Alabama-Birmingham
Sessions 61, Parker 26

AR Senate; Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
Pryor 52.5, Hutchinson 41.7

AR Senate; Zogby
Pryor 51, Hutchinson 40

CO Senate; Ciruli & Assoc. (Denver Post)
Strickland 42, Allard 41

CO Senate; Talmey-Drake (Rocky Mountain News)
Strickland 42, Allard 38

CO Senate; Zogby
Strickland 53, Allard 44

CT Governor; Univ. of Conn.
Rowland 54, Curry 36

FL Governor; Zogby
Bush 57, McBride 42

GA Senate; Zogby
Cleland 49, Chambliss 49

IL Governor; Zogby
Ryan 43.5, Blagojevich 43.2

KY-03; Louisville Courier-Journal
Northup 51, Conway 41

MA Governor; Boston Herald
O'Brien 42, Romney 41

MN Senate; Mason-Dixon
Coleman 47, Mondale 41

MN Senate; Star-Tribune
Mondale 46, Coleman 41

MN Senate; Zogby
Mondale 50, Coleman 45

MS-03; Stennis Institute
Pickering 54, Shows 27

MO Senate; Zogby
Carnahan 49, Talent 48

NM Governor; Mason-Dixon
Richardson 51, Sanchez 37

NJ Senate; Gannett New Jersey
Lautenberg 42, Forrester 37 (8 point lead w/leaners)

NJ Senate; Mason-Dixon
Lautenberg 47, Forrester 41

NJ Senate; Zogby
Lautenberg 54, Forrester 38

NC Senate; Zogby
Dole 52, Bowles 46

PA Governor; Mason-Dixon
Rendell 53, Fisher 36

SD Senate; Zogby
Johnson 52, Thune 47

TX Senate; Zogby
Cornyn 49, Kirk 48

UT-01; Valley Research
Bishop 46, Thomas 28

UT-02; Valley Research
Matheson 45, Swallow 35

If you want on or off my poll ping list, let me know!

10 posted on 11/03/2002 9:07:17 AM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
are these more of the heavy democrat samples?

Zogby has a special formula that adjusts for external factors such as fraud, first time voters, unexpected voters. Given the Zogby family infestation with the democrat party all his polls are suspect.
12 posted on 11/03/2002 9:07:59 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA; cake_crumb
FL Gov: McBride 42% Bush 57%

Not a shocker to me.
13 posted on 11/03/2002 9:08:52 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
where is "portrait of america" when we need it.[g]

dep

14 posted on 11/03/2002 9:09:24 AM PST by dep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
After the 2000 election, I got the feeling that Zogby, a registered rat, gets a heads up on where massive voter fraud for the rats will be happening.

The legitimate polling companies have to base their polling data on legitimate registered voters likely to vote. This is probably why they miss big time, and Zogby nails some elections.
15 posted on 11/03/2002 9:10:51 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
Zogby's special sauce is obviously figuring in a huge RAT turnout in most states. He has a pretty good track record on these things, but I sure hope he is missing this one.

If not, we could lose up to four Senate seats Tuesday.

19 posted on 11/03/2002 9:13:45 AM PST by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
WHERE IS LOUISIANA!!!
20 posted on 11/03/2002 9:13:46 AM PST by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Git Out and Vote !
VOTE EARLY, AND VOTE OFTEN

26 posted on 11/03/2002 9:16:54 AM PST by Dallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
They would like for Republicans to get frustrated and stay home. NO WAY! I'm VOTING no matter what the POLLS say! If I am the ONLY one voting Republican so be it!!! They will NOT discourage me from getting out and FIGHTING this fight!!! It didn't work!!!
28 posted on 11/03/2002 9:20:37 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
So,Unless the republicans, Excepting DOLE are NOT SHUT out
we can finally agree that Zogby's Special Sauce is r
29 posted on 11/03/2002 9:22:46 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
This looks like his wish list instead of a poll.
30 posted on 11/03/2002 9:23:35 AM PST by tall_tex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
There was another poll on FOX this AM that had Coleman ahead by 5 points in Mo.
Absentees also generally favor Republicans in quite a few states. They're busy working and have a harder time getting to the polls- where parasidic Dmocrats have nothing better to do.
It's like the "experts" profiling the snipers. Every one of them wrong.
36 posted on 11/03/2002 9:28:06 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
After seeing Zogby in some interviews, I don't trust him or his service any longer.
39 posted on 11/03/2002 9:28:59 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_LA
Well, we'll all be able now to test Zogby again. Congressional or statewide elections are more difficult to poll than national elections.

I hate predicting (because I'm horrible at it) but my gut and tea-leaves and poll readings lead me to think that Hutchinson goes down in Ark., Coleman pulls it out in Minn., Cleland goes down in Georgia, Laut squeaks by in Mob-NJ, Allard survives in Colorado, Bush and Dole win, and I've got no sense at all in S.D. (actually, I've probably got no sense at all, but that's another matter).

Zogby seems way off in Texas, but then he probably doesn't feel at home there anyway. So, depending on S.D. which could bump it one more, that'd give the Pubbies a +1 in the Senate, and Lincoln Chafee gets ready to get both cheeks kissed over and over.

42 posted on 11/03/2002 9:30:18 AM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson