Then you MUST be a shill. Who is paying you to disrupt threads on FR I wonder? Is it Enron, Global Crossing, Adelphia? Is it some rich fat exec who makes millions a year and isn't yet satisfied with what he has? Is it some cheap little man who thinks it's better for 12 year old children in China to work 14 hour days in order for him to pay $1 for something at WalMart that would have cost $2 if it had been made in the US instead?
I do think it's zazona's job to do everything they can to insure the quality of the data they present, and if they're source data sucks they should give a FULLY INCLUSSIVE list of the ways they've found it to suck.
You're obviously so brain dead and/or dishonest that you forget their FAQ DOES list all the data errors in the database. It is not THEIR database, it is the Department of Labor's database. They don't maintain it nor do they "massage" it. They simply have a copy of it and have provided a web based search engine that provides the ability to query the data. As I've said all along, you want to question the integrity of the database, then bring it up to the Department of Labor.
You'll also note that many many times I've stated that it's possible the erros come from the original DOL data. All you're creative quoting won't change what I said.
You MAY have just admitted as such, but you WERE insisting for the longest time it was zazona.com that was writing "crappy code", mishandling the data, and were generally inept. Your lies to the contrary notwithstanding, it is blatently obvious that you care less about the validity of the data than you do in DISCREDITING the validity of the data.
While you were insisting that DCM was guilty of fraud I was saying the problem could be in the DOL data. It's in the thread painfully obvious for anyone to see.
And it is plainfully obvious that you IGNORE any legitimate analysis of the data and that DCM DOES raise MANY red flags.
Regardless of the source of the data problems it is the job of the PRESENTER to build confidence in the data, if that means putting footnotes on every single entry they display then by God they should put footnotes on every single entry they display.
They need not bend over backwards to please inept shills at FR that want to discredit them. They list the errors that have become known, and duplicate records is NOT one of those errors. Again, call the Department of Labor and ask them about duplicate records if you are so concerned and interested in the subject.
The whole corporate scandal meltdown with Enron and company revolves around auditors not doing enough to note bad data when they saw it. Zazona should learn from that lesson.
No, the whole corporate meltdown scandal revolves around greed and dishonesty, the same character traits that quite obviously motivate you and your ilk.
I will feel NO sympathy for you whatsoever when you and your comrades' plans implode and you find yourselves begging for food. It couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of fellows.