[FormerLurker]

Every time you ask me to go away I'm coming back.

Then you MUST be a shill. Who is paying you to disrupt threads on FR I wonder? Is it Enron, Global Crossing, Adelphia? Is it some rich fat exec who makes millions a year and isn't yet satisfied with what he has? Is it some cheap little man who thinks it's better for 12 year old children in China to work 14 hour days in order for him to pay $1 for something at WalMart that would have cost $2 if it had been made in the US instead?

I do think it's zazona's job to do everything they can to insure the quality of the data they present, and if they're source data sucks they should give a FULLY INCLUSSIVE list of the ways they've found it to suck.

You're obviously so brain dead and/or dishonest that you forget their FAQ DOES list all the data errors in the database. It is not THEIR database, it is the Department of Labor's database. They don't maintain it nor do they "massage" it. They simply have a copy of it and have provided a web based search engine that provides the ability to query the data. As I've said all along, you want to question the integrity of the database, then bring it up to the Department of Labor.

You'll also note that many many times I've stated that it's possible the erros come from the original DOL data. All you're creative quoting won't change what I said.

You MAY have just admitted as such, but you WERE insisting for the longest time it was zazona.com that was writing "crappy code", mishandling the data, and were generally inept. Your lies to the contrary notwithstanding, it is blatently obvious that you care less about the validity of the data than you do in DISCREDITING the validity of the data.

While you were insisting that DCM was guilty of fraud I was saying the problem could be in the DOL data. It's in the thread painfully obvious for anyone to see.

And it is plainfully obvious that you IGNORE any legitimate analysis of the data and that DCM DOES raise MANY red flags.

Regardless of the source of the data problems it is the job of the PRESENTER to build confidence in the data, if that means putting footnotes on every single entry they display then by God they should put footnotes on every single entry they display.

They need not bend over backwards to please inept shills at FR that want to discredit them. They list the errors that have become known, and duplicate records is NOT one of those errors. Again, call the Department of Labor and ask them about duplicate records if you are so concerned and interested in the subject.

The whole corporate scandal meltdown with Enron and company revolves around auditors not doing enough to note bad data when they saw it. Zazona should learn from that lesson.

No, the whole corporate meltdown scandal revolves around greed and dishonesty, the same character traits that quite obviously motivate you and your ilk.

I will feel NO sympathy for you whatsoever when you and your comrades' plans implode and you find yourselves begging for food. It couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of fellows.

[discostu]

Ah yes the last defense of the hopelessly wrong. "You're a shill". I'd have to be a hell of a lot older to have worked for half the companies I've been accused of by people like you.

Here's the basic problem: you're full of crap, and I'm right. And the more desperate your accusations become the more it is my duty to defend my honor against these attacks upon my character.

No it's zazona's database which, as you've pointed out many times, is an exact replica of the DOL database. Two databases, one is owned by DOL and is the source for all the data, one is owned by zazona. That's THEIR database, regardless of what it's a copy of. I'm bringing it up to YOU because YOU'RE using it to prove some point, I'm pointing out that your evidence is flawed. This is your pet issue, YOU bring it up to DOL.

I was pointing out DOL's probable screw-up with the data when we were both falsely thinking it was the INS. You might not have heard me because you were screaming fraud over and over hoping it might come true. You're analysis isn't legitimate because it blatantly ignores the many other companies I pointed out had the same problem. You were focusing obsessively on one company as if that were the only example ignoring the evidence I had presented, thus completely invalidating your analysis, which I pointed out numerous times, but you were busy coming up with more and more dramatic excuses.

If they want to have the slightest credibility they need to define the limitations of the data they are presenting.

Ooops FL shows his ignorance of accounting again. If you look at the backlogs you'll find that the accounting firms in question FOUND all of the problems years ago but they did nothing about it. Thus THAT is the cause of the problem.

Oh now I'm a commie, keep the wild accusations coming FL, everyone invalidates your "case" a little more.