Posted on 10/20/2002 7:48:19 AM PDT by SamAdams76
Go rent a white van in the DC area and drive around for awhile. Get dragged out of your vehicle, get thrown face down into the pavement and handcuffed.
THEN come back and tell us all how you aren't worried about your "civil rights".
Which perp? Goldstein?
I'm trying to engage yours! You stated that you disagree with the tactics used by LE. I would really like to know what tactics you would deem acceptable
You do know why this is different than other murders in the country don't you?
We can't defend ourselves against this. That is why.
Most murders happen between people who hate each other. I can protect myself from people that I KNOW are out to get me. I can't protect myself from someone who doesn't know me at all.
We can avoid being victims of crime, usually, by staying in good areas, being around good people, and avoiding risky situations. This crime breaks all those rules. It can hit anybody. Anybody at all. That is why it is different.
Absurd. yes, but so is handcuffing someone you have no reason to arrest.
Which makes it look more like terrorism.
These drivers were probably refusing. If that's what it takes to get this killer, then that's what it takes. I like my friends and family too much to want to screw around nit picking issues.
I keep hearing people scream about the Constitution. Well, how about the part where we citizens have some responsibility for protecting ourselves and each other? I don't very much like these people who are running around screaming about their rights when their fellow citizens are getting picked off like sitting ducks. If we can't depend on each other during a crunch then the Constitution won't matter much anyway. It was written for a moral people who felt a sense of responsibility toward their community. Not a bunch of selfish A@@holes who can only think about themselves.
I keep hearing people quote "if you care more about security then liberty, then you deserve neither". That's twisting words to suit a message. As far as I'm concerned, those who lack the commonsense to recognize the seriousness of the situation and cooperate are from the bottom of the gene pool and deserve what they get.
If these are terrorists and if this is the case, then the "suicide" aspect of their denouement could be quite spectacular and deadly to many in the vicinity of the point of apprehension.
I suspect the police are aware of this and are taking the necessary steps to minimize the chances of that outcome.
While the howls of derision on this site over the more abstract and cerebral issues related to "rights" are forceful and seemingly plentiful enough -- the noise from the general populace second-guessing an apprehension gone very bad, in the sense of a large number of deaths and injuries caused by the desperate perps at the moment they sense "the end", would be thunderous and overwhelming. Heads (hopefully, not literally) would roll throughout law enforcement and government over that outcome.
And if this is terrorism on our soil, then there is a state of war in this place. The first such extended circumstance of this magnitude since the Civil War. To say the least, we are not used to war on our soil. Many fine (and less-fine) points of civil liberties and protections succumb to practicality in a state of war. What we are seeing is the government's actions ratcheting up to a war-time footing, made all the more complicated because the modern face of war is asymmetrical, and unlike the west, our enemies aren't really concerned with western sensibilities -- such as announcing yourself before and after your attack.
I guess you wouldn't mind eating a bit of dirt with a boot in the back of your neck while you're held at gunpoint with handcuffs on...
You create a useless dichotomy, a childish either/or. The police, while continuing their investigation, have a responsibility to the citizens to keep them informed with relevant and accurate info. What possible excuse is there for Moose playing his silly game of not revealing to the public that the casing found in the box van was not a 223? Or for not revealing what is known of the specifics of the sites that the shooter has chosen to shoot from? Or what the handwriting on the tarot card looked like?
They require evidence that he IS, NOT evidence that he ISN'T!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.