XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SAT OCT 19, 2002 11:42:34 ET XXXXX Posted on 10/19/2002 10:01:38 AM PDT by The Raven
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SAT OCT 19, 2002 11:42:34 ET XXXXX
DOWD: BUSH 'BOY EMPEROR'
NY TIMES op-ed queen Maureen Dowd is planning to rip President Bush like she has never ripped before in a dispatch set for Sunday publication, sources close to the columnist tell DRUDGE.
Dowd, courting controversy, declares: "The Boy Emperor picked up the morning paper and, stunned, dropped his Juicy Juice box with the little straw attached. 'Oh, man,' he wailed. 'North Korea's got nukes... 'Get me Condi!' the boy yelled. 'And a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.'"
Dowd refers to Bush as a "boy" no less than ten times in the column she's planning to file.
"'Huh?' the Boy said."
Dowd mocks.
MORE
"Boy Emperor was starting to feel bamboozled."
Dowd stabs.
'"Why are we mad at North Korea for flouting its international agreements when we flout our international agreements?' the Boy wondered."
Dowd pops.
"...the Boy pressed."
Dowd punches.
"The Boy Emperor was more befuddled than ever."
On and on Dowd goes until she hits 711 brutal words, and finally comes up for air.
Ouch! Remind me not to get on your bad side! ;-)
Why is this woman smiling? Read on.
HOW OLD is TO OLD to be SEXUALLY ACTIVE?
by Cathleen Jo Faruque, LICSW, D.A.P.A.
The truth is, human beings are fortunately never too old to enjoy a happy and healthy sex life. Despite this good news, many people, young and old alike, are astounded at the idea of people remaining sexually active in their sixties, seventies, eighties and beyond. It is frequently assumed that elderly persons lose their sexual desires or that they are physically unable to perform. We all recognize the media's portrayal of the elderly as sexually undesirable. The whole notion of elderly persons having sexual relations is somehow perverse.
Darling, you could never be on my bad side. Rather, whoever is on your bad side is on my bad side. ;)
Love, Ivan
Don't all liberals?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/763536/posts
you can see it. I don't know how to post links. I swear I'll learn one day...
If this Drudge article is true, it is pure slander!
This would be something you would see posted in DU or Dem.com!
Even dem bootlickers like Mary McGrory, Ellen Goodman and Molly Ivins wouldn't resort to this type of bile!
Drudge has a good-sized audience and the bitch might get wind of it and tone down her vitriol before she releases the article.
(Dowd --- as you may have noticed from the Constitution's Viewpoints page,
which sometimes uses her columns --- enjoys tongue-in-cheek writing. The
day before George W. Bush's inauguration last month, the Constitution
published a column where she made up quotes from an inaugural planner
about how the Bush campaign wanted a return-to-the-Confederacy theme for
the festivities. It was intended to be funny. Some readers took it seriously. I
had to tell them it was a joke, just not a very good one.)
Dowd dreams of being slapped around; defiled and dominated; becoming the pivot b***h in a circle-jerk; passed between Billy-boy, Arafat, Castro and a transvestite to be named later; webcast being ganged by the DNC and the DSA to pervert-pay-per-view subscribers and finally crawling into a Planned Parenthood abortion mill because she can never be sure which trick is her baby's daddy.
Dowd-y Dowd is a dried up, has been who never was. The Times is a worthless Leftist rag whose "Times" have long ago passed by.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
