Skip to comments.Survivor says she caught STD [Wichita Massacre Day 9]
Posted on 10/18/2002 7:07:22 AM PDT by KS Flyover
click here to read article
For detais about the murders see: The Wichita Massacre
Wichita Massacre Trial Threads:
Wichita to revisit brutal slayings as testimony begins - 10/07/2002
Deputy recalls moment of discovering bodies [Wichita Murders] Day 1 - 10/07/2002
WICHITA MASSACRE TRIAL UNDERWAY Day 1 - 10/08/2002
Legal wrangling opens Carr trial [Wichita Murders] Day 1 - 10/08/2002
Carr trial: Survivor describes sexual attacks by armed intruders [Wichita Massacre] Day 2 - 10/09/2002
Witchita Case of Black Racist Crime Survivor's testimony horrifies courtroom Day 2 - 10/10/2002
Woman testifies that Carrs killed her friends in a soccer field [Wichita Massacre Day 3] - 10/10/2002
Prosecutors Downplay Racial Element in Kansas Murder Trial - 10/11/2002
Reginald Carr had $996, victims' credit card, watch [Wichita Massacre Day 4] - 10/11/2002
Wichita Massacre Audio of 911 Call by Female Survivor with Court Room Video Footage From Day 1- 10/11/2002
Victims' belongings linked to defendant [Wichita Massacre Day 5] - 10/12/2002
Trial opens window into night of fear - 10/13/2002
Media Ignore Kansas Interracial Mass Murder - 10/14/2002
AP Finally Reports Wichita Trial... But Mentions "White Supremacist" Support - 10/14/2002
Nosey mom tips off cops (Wichita Massacre) Day 6 - 10/15/2002
'I was afraid,' witness says [Wichita Massacre Day 6] - 10/15/2002
ATM photos shown in Carr trial [Wichita Massacre Day 7] - 10/16/2002
Testimony on cellist slaying fills Carr trial [Wichita Massacre Day 8] - 10/17/2002
"Wichita Massacre" murder trial "Ping List".
Please let me know if you want on (or off) this list.
I realize he is the judge and must remain neutral, but this woman is no WITNESS she is a f*ing VICTIM. We finally have a true victim in this country just chock full o' victims, and she is referred to as a witness. Up is down and down is up. fsf
Not to put too fine a point on it, but samples of the disease causing agent (virus or bacterium) could be taken and cultured from both victim and attacker, then the DNA compared. If it's the exact same pathogen, then there will be strong reason to believe he gave it to her...
I don't know the law in Kansas, but in GA it's a pretty safe bet that when the prosecutors and the police investigating the case didn't know the undisclosed evidence from a witness, it's allowed in if the defense is given time to inspect the new evidence before it's given to the jury. This little gambit would not cut much ice here, don't think it will in Kansas either. Plus there's the wonderful saving grace of "overwhelming evidence". If the error wouldn't have affected the verdict, it may be error but it's not harmful error. Hopefully, that's what this is.
The degradation of the American *justice* system, courtesy of scumbag lawyers like Val Wachtel.
it will give the jury the impression he is a dangerous person
Words fail me, and I'm angry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.