Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times goes wilding on Central Park jogger (ANN COULTER)
worldnetdaily ^ | 10/16/2002 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 10/16/2002 4:20:57 PM PDT by TLBSHOW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 10/16/2002 4:20:57 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
"That's all a Muslim has. his word." "

Islamic treatment of the USA and Americans.

Islamic biology.

Islamic Engineering (viral-ridden debris of Hamacide )


2 posted on 10/16/2002 4:28:31 PM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Thus, in a stunningly dishonest article, the New York Times...

I was unaware the New York Times ever published any other kind!!??

3 posted on 10/16/2002 4:40:33 PM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Islam is the problem! Islam is the enemy!
4 posted on 10/16/2002 5:00:06 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW

5 posted on 10/16/2002 5:08:23 PM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Ann Coulter's right. One "wilding" case was plenty for New York City and while I've never associated riffraff like those convicted off the brutal crimer with my sex, it nauseates me to think the caring and progressive folks think the passage of time has made them innocent. They received a fair trial. The woman who was raped has to live with what happened to her for the rest of her life. No the New York Times new spin on the case has less to do with the actual facts than the Bill Clinton-fostered perception that a man's word is to be believed over a woman's, especially when the man is the sort of fellow liberals drool over. And now we can see who Bubba's new beneficiaries are. Come to think of it, as Ann would surely put it, when it comes to manhandling women, the NY wilding scum and Bubba are in heartfelt agreement that the only reason for women to exist on earth is to service a man's needs. Hear, hear the Mullah Howard Raines liberals praise the virtues of unabashed male chauvinism in all its glory with nary a peep from NOW. Even NOW's President Kim Gandy has to agree the treatment of women in the United States has finally come a long way, baby!
6 posted on 10/16/2002 5:20:59 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Thank you . . .
7 posted on 10/16/2002 5:26:27 PM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Please people, if you subscribe to the NYT. . .cancel. . .get your news elsewhere for a while.

This paper, these people cannot be held separate from the scum they report. . .

8 posted on 10/16/2002 5:30:52 PM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
This is an article that badly needed to be written.

The New York Times has been putting on a very convincing show for people who may have forgotten all the details of the story. This is a very timely reminder of what actually happened.
9 posted on 10/16/2002 5:51:13 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Thank Heavens for such a wonderful woman to set the record straight after all these years. Those animals should have been shot forthwith and we wouldn't have these kinds of discussions in the first place. "Liberalism" is a disease, face it. (I use the term loosely, since there is nothing liberal about it in the classical sense)

Miss Coulter, would you like to go out for coffee or something?

10 posted on 10/16/2002 6:01:25 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
New York Times = Village Voice. It has gotten that obvious.
11 posted on 10/16/2002 6:12:07 PM PDT by Crawdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crawdad
"New York Times = Village Voice. It has gotten that obvious."

You have libeled the Village Voice.

The Village Voice has Nat Hentoff.

The New York Times has Maureen Dowd.

Please retract your vile smear...(:>)

12 posted on 10/16/2002 6:44:13 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
And the revisionism never stops. This is like that word game where, by changing one letter at a time, the word, perhaps like "demon" may be changed into "angel". The NYT is quite adept at this skill.

"Muslims never lie." But the truth can be a very slippery concept.

13 posted on 10/17/2002 2:47:40 AM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW

Ann is a great American.

14 posted on 10/17/2002 4:37:06 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
I don't care much for the rest of her Olive Oil body but damn she's got a NICE rack!!
15 posted on 10/17/2002 4:49:59 AM PDT by Johnny Shear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Shear
Really? I didn't notice
:^]
16 posted on 10/17/2002 5:26:11 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
your post and pictures really put everything in perspective.

I'm so tired of the BS - islam = peace lies.

NO ONE believes it - it's time more people say it aloud!

17 posted on 10/17/2002 5:41:55 AM PDT by SunnyUsa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Another Bump for the truth. Ann continues to document the continuous lies and absence of straight talk from the Media in this country.

And ain't it amazing, none of them seems the least bit shamed by these kind of revelations and documentation of their lies in print.
18 posted on 10/17/2002 5:49:35 AM PDT by txzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txzman
And ain't it amazing, none of them seems the least bit shamed by these kind of revelations and documentation of their lies in print.

If the lazy, yellow journalists employed by such bird cage liner as The New York Times acknowledged what you alluded to, their whole world view would crumble.

Judeo-Christianity would be superior to Islam, the US would not be inherently evil, and there might actually be a difference between right and wrong.

Can't have that...............

19 posted on 10/17/2002 7:23:09 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
The NYTimes doesn't have an agenda, this article must be wrong (sarcasm)
20 posted on 10/17/2002 10:28:57 AM PDT by Michael2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson