Posted on 10/15/2002 5:06:55 PM PDT by Focault's Pendulum
You mean the obvious truth that Islam is a religion based on oppression and hate? Or, that while perhaps only .001% of Muslims are actively involved in murder campaigns against the infidels (i.e. all non-Muslims), 90% of Muslims agree 100% with the radicals concept of Jihad?
Or, that many of those other 90% are eagerly awaiting their call to arms from their local Mosque?
Hell, I'm a red-neck anti-Muslim bigot, and proud of it. I don't intrinsically hate any race, religion, or sect of people, but I sure as heck know that a lot of Muslim's in this country would whoop it up if a bomb took out my kid's Christian school. (Christians would grieve if the same thing happened to a Muslim madrassah.) I will not be confused about who the enemy is by leftist-PC rhetoric.
I'd love to believe that their are lots of "peace loving", live-and-let, patriotic American Muslims out there, but then Mohammad also directed his followers that it was a virtue to lie to infidels. Concepts like “truth” only apply between two Muslims, so when a Muslim looks straight into the camera and lies about what the Koran plainly says, in his own eyes he’s not lying, but instead is doing “Allah’s work”. The Koran also states that it's the duty as much as privilege of every good Muslim to seize "booty" from the infidels, including and especially the infidels women.
It’s a thoroughly corrupt religion. You absolutely cannot trust a Muslim. Americans who have grown up in a Judeo-Christian culture (the U.S. culture IS ethically Judeo-Christian) simply cannot understand a people who see them as lower than dogs. Trying to engage in a rational discussion with a Islamic radical is like a Jew in WWII trying to engage a Nazi. The Jew may have thought he was making progress, while the Nazi was calculating the amount of gold the Jew's teeth would yield. Infidels are not human beings to a Muslim.
< /end rant >
FReegards .. SFS
There also seems to be some contention that is was not our pair (I think it is an individual) of subjects who were involved with somneone else 'backing out' leaving only the observations in the parking lot under the artifical illumination light source in place there ...
I concur.....also for those intellectually challenged, I believe the Hispanic/Middle Eastern description was a way of candy coating the the latter.
Well I don't know about Tuesdays but them holing up on the weekends makes sense. The goal of terrorism is to put people in fear. Well on the weekends, most people have some options, they can go out if they want to or, if they have concerns for their safety, they can stay at home.
However come Monday morning their choices become more limited. They have to go to work, the kids need to go to school, and so they are more boxed in, in terms of choices. So if one wanted to strike fear in people hearts, make them think that they are not safe when they have fewer choices, i.e. during the week.
Given the input I've seen so far - the only illumination of the subject was from parking lot illumination and judging from the yellowish/orange-ish color I recall seeing on the video from the video footage from the scene we aren't dealing with metal halide with a cited 'color rendition' of 85% that of natural sunlight ... There also seems to be some contention that is was not our pair (I think it is an individual) of subjects who were involved with somneone else 'backing out' leaving only the observations in the parking lot under the artifical illumination light source in place there ...
I can phrase it even better....how's about just plain old "swarthy"?
I don't know. Is there anything special going on down at the mosque on Tusdays? Or maybe that is scheduled for gun cleaning day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.