Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alabama ban on sex toys is struck down as unconstitutional
Associated Press | October 11, 2002

Posted on 10/11/2002 1:29:58 PM PDT by HAL9000

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) -- An Alabama law banning the sale of sex toys was struck down by a federal judge as a violation of the right to privacy.

"The fundamental right of privacy, long recognized by the Supreme Court as inherent among our constitutional protections, incorporates a right to sexual privacy,'' U.S. District Judge Lynwood Smith Jr. said Wednesday.

He said the state did not prove it has a legitimate interest in banning the sale of sex devices for use in private, consensual relationships between adults.

The 1998 law -- part of a package of legislation strengthening the state's obscenity law -- banned the sale of devices designed for "the stimulation of human genital organs.'' It was challenged by six women who either sell sex aids or said they need them for sexual gratification.

Copyright 2002 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: alabama; sextoys
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-222 next last
To: Britton J Wingfield
If you had come into my bedroom to arrest me for getting a bj from my girlfriend, you would have left in a bag.

Natural reaction to unexpected surprise is to clinch one's teeth. A small bag might be handy.

101 posted on 10/11/2002 4:46:26 PM PDT by LowOiL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: flyervet
This is worth repeating!

Just so you know, you don't have to be a Libertarian to think that police have better things to do than haunt dark roads in search of horny teenagers.

102 posted on 10/11/2002 4:47:15 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
Maybe there was a shortage at the time and they thought that 3 should be good enough even for the horniest chick?
103 posted on 10/11/2002 4:48:31 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
wow

To: FF578 The Crimes Against Nature (Sodomy Law) is a felony in North Carolina, and it is used a lot in law enforcement. Come into my bedroom and try to arrest me for getting a blow job from my wife and you will be leaving in a bag. 56 posted on 10/11/02 5:37 PM Eastern by Phantom Lord [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

104 posted on 10/11/2002 4:50:13 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Lowelljr
Heh, I must admit that is a good one.
105 posted on 10/11/2002 4:52:57 PM PDT by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


I think I would have to disagree with you that there is no right to privacy in the Constitution. Amendment IX guarantees all rights not specifically reserved to the government in the Constitution. It obviously doesn't justify killing another (unborn) person, but I think we should defend a right to privacy.
106 posted on 10/11/2002 5:09:08 PM PDT by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
"Just think about all of the counties in the U.S. where it's illegal to buy booze. Ludicrous also, but perfectly constitutional." - SP

These local prohibitionary type laws are only 'legal' because they are never challenged to the upper courts on constitutional grounds. [just as per the sex toy 'law']

Lets say I live in a dry county and get some mail order wine delivered to my residence.

-- Can the sheriff bust the mailman? - Nope. Not constitutionally.
-- Can he bust me for having bought it from my own house? - Nope. Not Constitutional.
-- Can the cops bust me for possession? Nope - unconstitutional.

The 'law' only stands as a ~regulation~ on commercial buying & selling. [which IS constitutional]
- Not as a prohibition on an individual right.



107 posted on 10/11/2002 5:20:43 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
"... I think we should defend a right to privacy."

I don't, unless someone wants to propose a new Constitutional amendment creating one. Whether you agree or disagree with the law, it should be clear that declaring it unconstitutional is a flagrant usurpation of states' rights. In essence, it's one federal judge striking down a state law based on a filmsy pretense because he finds it disagreeable. Such legislating from the bench shouldn't stand.

108 posted on 10/11/2002 5:32:45 PM PDT by Polonius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Polonius
"I think we should defend a right to privacy."


I don't, unless someone wants to propose a new Constitutional amendment creating one.
_________________________________

No need:

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
109 posted on 10/11/2002 6:18:20 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: FF578
"Every Single State had laws banning Pornography. Every Single State had laws banning homosexuality, sodomy, fornication, adultery, and blasphemy."

So what? It doesn't mean that they were right. Our founders, while good people all, weren't perfect. Many of them owned slaves. That wasn't right.

Additionally, when Adams said morality it wasn't sex he was talking about. Who's more moral, an honest legislator that has fun with his wife and a dildo, or a corrupt one that does it in the missionary position? Besides, you never did answer my question. Some religons believe dancing is immoral. Should we make it illegal?

110 posted on 10/11/2002 6:19:09 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FF578
You know shakespeare said "Brevity is the soul of wit."

You really doth protest too much.
111 posted on 10/11/2002 6:25:49 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
In Alabama a sex toy is a pair of overalls with the pockets cut out

LOL and bares repeating.
112 posted on 10/11/2002 6:26:54 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Smith could barely be heard over the sound of his viabrator while rendering his opinion.
113 posted on 10/11/2002 6:30:09 PM PDT by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FF578
"I find it amazing that there seems to be so many of them on the internet,"

That's because they're generally smarter than the general population. I've yet to meet a poor libertarian who works at McDonalds.
114 posted on 10/11/2002 6:33:33 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lowelljr
"If some weirdo wants to screw a FAKE chicken in the privacy of his own home, whats it to you?

Where do you draw the line? Should they be able to sell blow up little boys too?

Frictionless Slope

115 posted on 10/11/2002 6:36:06 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: amused; HAL9000
LOL....second time I'm brought to tears today. You couldn't have had a more appropriate photo.

Dildo, oops I mean Ditto.

116 posted on 10/11/2002 6:39:41 PM PDT by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FF578
I prefer the Crimes against nature Charge for prostitutes that I can show used oral sex and for unmarried people "Parking." You are correct that most officers charge Indecent Exposure instead of CAN when it comes to unmarried "Parking" and most use G.S. 14-204 when charging prostitutes.

I don't.

I prefer the felony charge

You probably get YOUR jollies off arresting some boyfriend-girlfriend for "parking". You think your some kind of avenging angel or something....sick. I don't think people engaging in sex on public property is so great, but a FELONY????

As an LEO you know what a felony does to someone for the rest of their lives. Jesus.

You're sick. That's not the act of a true Chrsitian.

117 posted on 10/11/2002 6:41:43 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
ROFLMAO!
118 posted on 10/11/2002 6:44:10 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: flyervet
NC is full of self-righteous religeous nutcases.
119 posted on 10/11/2002 6:45:41 PM PDT by MonroeDNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
Chrsitian. = Christian.
120 posted on 10/11/2002 6:47:00 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson