To: Vic3O3
If it's "shots", it isn't the sniper. He hasn't fired twice yet.
6 posted on
10/11/2002 11:48:50 AM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
Actulaly I thought the 15 year old was shot at twice? That was why they weren't sure if it was the same person/people.
10 posted on
10/11/2002 11:50:01 AM PDT by
Mixer
To: Dog Gone
That depends. I'm waiting for him to expand and start taking out multiples.
To: Dog Gone
If it's "shots", it isn't the sniper. He hasn't fired twice yet. He hasn't missed yet either. Suppose he missed on his first shot - don't you think he shoot again?
15 posted on
10/11/2002 11:50:53 AM PDT by
BearCub
To: Dog Gone
True, but this won't be the first time the media had the details wrong with respect to 'shots' fired in this series of killings.
17 posted on
10/11/2002 11:51:05 AM PDT by
Quilla
To: Dog Gone
I believe that term "shots fired" can be misleading. It's a term that is used once one shot goes off. There may or may not have been more than one.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson