Skip to comments.
Major networks will not air Bush speech
drudge
| 10/07/02
| me
Posted on 10/07/2002 8:24:03 AM PDT by LandofLincoln
All of the major networks have decided not to carry Bushes speech live.
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
To: LandofLincoln
I just got polled by Channel 8 down here in Tampa on whether or not the networks should run the speech...
Then they asked my age and race.
41
posted on
10/07/2002 9:02:45 AM PDT
by
piasa
Comment #42 Removed by Moderator
To: rintense
Thanks for your email addresses.
I just emailed the following message to these left wing whores on their knees to Tommy Da$$hole and Saddam for not covering President Bush's speech tonight"
To the left wing maggots who control the news on NBCCBSABC:
It was/is predictable that your slimey nets would not carry President Bush's important speech on Iraq to the American People tonight.
How much did Saddam and his Opecker Princes pay your miserable networks not to carry his speech?
Don't bother responding.
This is why your networks have become Irrelevant. If Bill Clintoon was eating a bowl of beans at a cheap diner, you would immediately cover it.
To: ELS
It's OK...the President and First Lady are not needy like the Clintons and the media. The country will go on and President Bush will do what he has to do without the media. It's very simple. Bush does what he chooses without all the silliness from the media. Listen, those networks are fast going down the tubes and all the so called personalities will be hoofing it looking for real jobs. Relax. Our country is in good hands.
To: dead
I dont know about you but Im looking for the Alutian Islands
45
posted on
10/07/2002 9:17:39 AM PDT
by
woofie
To: dead
Also the horn of Africa...
46
posted on
10/07/2002 9:19:07 AM PDT
by
woofie
To: Grampa Dave
Gramps, I'm convulsed with laughter! You sho enuf know how to use the stilleto and wield the axe at the same time!
Leni
To: ELS
Don't forget the 1992 election between, as CNN put it, "President Clinton" and "Mr. Bush"...I never watched them again...
48
posted on
10/07/2002 9:20:01 AM PDT
by
NorCoGOP
To: LandofLincoln
I guess it is only fair, nobody watches the networks anymore either.
49
posted on
10/07/2002 9:20:05 AM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: Wphile
Thanks for the ping. :)
What a disappointment but not altogether surprising, they are reverting to form. For weeks they've been beating the President has to make his case to the American people drum yet when he addresses the issue they decide not to cover it. Clearly, they are not interested in the President making his case, they simply want to control the message.
50
posted on
10/07/2002 9:22:09 AM PDT
by
Darlin'
To: Darlin'
Needs repeating
Clearly, they are not interested in the President making his case, they simply want to control the message.
51
posted on
10/07/2002 9:23:11 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Mo1
>>A major speech about our future and they WON'T air it?? <<
It's not about the economy which is more of a concern to the American people at the moment.
52
posted on
10/07/2002 9:26:08 AM PDT
by
orfisher
To: Alberta's Child
The only plausible explanation is that a thick cloud cover blocked the light of the full moon last Saturday, so there's nothing to discuss for now.... 8)
53
posted on
10/07/2002 9:27:10 AM PDT
by
tracer
To: orfisher
If we don't deal with our National Security NOW .. there won't be any economy to worry about later
54
posted on
10/07/2002 9:28:24 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: dead
If you can't find the M.E., just ask Colon Powell where it's at....
55
posted on
10/07/2002 9:30:30 AM PDT
by
tracer
To: Mo1
Bump.
I hope Bush makes some very big news and they're left hanging in the air. Make my day.
56
posted on
10/07/2002 9:33:26 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: rintense
Thank you for providing the convenient links, rintense. :) I just know they'll be grateful to hear my opinion about "their" decision making process and the ultimate effect it will have on "their" economy. Especially since they're suddenly so all fired interested in the "economy"
57
posted on
10/07/2002 9:34:11 AM PDT
by
Darlin'
To: MinuteGal
I used to send a weekly email to the maggots in charge of ABC begging them to keep Politically Correct and Peter Jennings on tv mouthing their mantras of hate.
Finally I got a private email back from one of their maggots saying that Politically Correct was gone but that Jennings was staying.
You can't be polite with these clymers. You hit them in the head with a two by four, and then you use your boots on them as they lay there.
I see their not carrying tonight's speech as another long line of acts of treason by the major nets since 9/11.
To: aShepard
What??? No chance for a DemocRAT Response?That was my first thought! Why they won't get a chance to bad-mouth the President.Because this is a horrible issue for DemoncRATS, the alphabet channels are letting them off easy by not carrying this speech. Though it does beg the question,was there ever a time when they didn't carry one of the #42's speeches(ie. diversionary, brief mis-leadings/false and heartless apologies) ,Policy or not, EVER?Thank you very much.<====dripping sarcasm
59
posted on
10/07/2002 9:38:25 AM PDT
by
Pagey
To: orfisher
No, the economy is what the democrats and the press tell you the American people are interested in and some people are foolish enough to believe them. Of course, they're mostly democarts and RINOs
60
posted on
10/07/2002 9:38:43 AM PDT
by
Darlin'
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson