Skip to comments.
Hillary: I Still Want Answers About What Bush Knew on 9/11
NewsMax ^
| 10/4/02
| Limbacher
Posted on 10/04/2002 6:32:37 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: twigs
I agree with you. Hil is evil (whereas Bill is just amoral). What I am wondering, do evil people realize they are evil? Do they understand about making right and wrong choices? Do the immoral choices they make ever bother them? I just can't understand how they think, how they can rationalize lies, cheats, etc. They must think they are above any judgement, Divine or otherwise.
41
posted on
10/04/2002 7:07:10 AM PDT
by
Dudoight
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Hillary should start with what she knew beginning in 1993 after the first attack on the WTC. I assume her husband may have had some involvement as well.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
ALERT!
43
posted on
10/04/2002 7:11:37 AM PDT
by
mc5cents
To: <1/1,000,000th%
Here is her number: 202-224-4451.
I just called. Too angry to be articulate... I said, it is fair for her to ask what the President knew and when he knew it... but, I hope her investigation will go into her husband's administration to find out what he knew and what he refused to do.
Then I became incoherent and couldn't get past the phrase, her hypocrisy galls me. It just galls me!
Man, I can't stand those two.
To: Chad Fairbanks
Flim Flam - FALN Terrorists. Hope the voters smarten up in NY when Hitlery is up for re-election, although I think her next step is the presidency. This HAS GOT to be an issue in a post 9/11 world. Setting terrorists free was never a good idea, but should be viewed as pure insanity now.
45
posted on
10/04/2002 7:25:02 AM PDT
by
Peach
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It takes a villiage to get this woman to shut up.
(And they better have torches and pitchforks with them)
46
posted on
10/04/2002 7:26:37 AM PDT
by
tcostell
To: Peach
And I hope the people of this country remember that when she runs for president - since she was 'co-president', she can accept all the baggage that comes with it...
To: Corporate Law
I still answers as to what you did/knew in Whitewater, FBI files, ChiCom........I still want to know who hired Craig Livingstone.
To: Peach
Yeah!We want ANSWERS too,HildeBeast!!Who was responsible for hiring Craig Livingstone(as if we didn't know)!!!Why did those Rose billing-records go missing for two-years!!!!What REALLY led to the death of Vince Foster!!!!!!!!!!Note that I didn't say(as Rep.Lantos would say,"SuuuuuuuuIIIIIciiiiide"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To: tacticalogic
Forgot about the fat ex-bouncer. I want that answer too.
To: Orual
WhoooPss!!!!!!
To: OldFriend
You're right inasmuch as The DemocRats only obey laws and rules when it suits them!
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Yeah, right. Exactly what did you and your scumbag husband know about Oklahoma City and the Iraquis, and when did you know it, Mrs. Clinton?
53
posted on
10/04/2002 7:40:03 AM PDT
by
Victor
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Well that just fine Ms. Clinton, but what did Bill know and when did he know it? Lets take a look into this former, disgraced president too, huh?
And as far as the quote by NYT regarding "Bush knew...." its they that made this made this accusation, so its up to them to substaniate that story. Ask the NYT what they know and when did they know it!
54
posted on
10/04/2002 7:40:24 AM PDT
by
rstevens
To: Peach
Listen, Senator of the Damned:
I still want you to admit your rapist husband bombed a Sudanese aspirin factory and killed innocent blacks because he was covering up Monica, "hide the cigar", and his own perjury.
I still want to know why your rapist husband pardoned FALN terrororists.
I still want to know why your rapist husband didn't bother to go the WTC after the 1993 attack.
I still want to know why your rapist husband rejected two offers by the Sudanese to capture and hand over Osama bin Laden.
Just shut up, you vicious, megalomaniac, hypocritical FeminNazi dyke!!!!
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The media campaign to salvage some semblance of a "legacy" for the klintoons continues.
"60 Minutes" just aired an interview with two klintonistas who served on his national security (LOL!) staff who've written a book detailing how they kept out of the loop by Freeh's FBI DESPITE klintoon's srenuous efforts to get them in. They stated that Freeh held klintoon "in contempt." (Duuhhhh!)
They claim that because the FBI was INVESTIGATING the klintoons, the klintoons had little leverage in the situation and klintoon's efforts to "get" bin Laden were frustrated as a result.
These klintoon flaks also told Dan Blather that although much of the senior military leadership considered klintoon a good president (GUFFAW!), the lower ranks held him in contempt. (Double Duuhhhh!!)
The only legacy for which the klintoons will be remembered has just been cleared up from around lower Manhattan, just east of Shirly Highway in Arlington, VA and a field in PA!
And it WASN'T because klintoon couldn't get more information from the traditional sources: It was because he was
1. Distracted by the several hundred scandals in which he became entangled;
2. His list of lies grew daily and just keeping up with them consumed 16 hours of his workday; and 3. When he wasn't being deposed, fielding calls from lawyers, leaning on FOBs for the $ to PAY the legal bills, keeping up with his Lie List, he was groping female visitors or getting gum bumps and hummers from willing interns in the Oral Office.
And while Bush ain't perfect, Hitlery is questioning HIS integrity?
Did I forget anything?
To: Tumbleweed_Connection; All
57
posted on
10/04/2002 7:45:58 AM PDT
by
backhoe
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
And I still want back all the china, furniture and other public items you STOLE from the White House!
To: Chad Fairbanks
since she was 'co-president'Was it legal for the US to have a 'co-president'?
If she was 'co-president' for eight years is she therefore unable to run for president?
59
posted on
10/04/2002 7:49:35 AM PDT
by
Lockbox
To: Lockbox
Hmmm.... I wonder what the legal implications of THAT are... LOL
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson