Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Satellite will be a great way to deliver Internet services in Africa, South America and other third-world countries - but not the USA.

FCC Chairman Michael Powell has been pushing satellite Internet as a solution for the U.S. But most Direcway subscribers are dissatisfied with their service, Starband is in bankruptcy, and other companies like Teledesic and WildBlue never got off the ground.

Meanwhile, Canada, South Korea, Japan and several other industrialized countries are moving forward with superior wireline and terrestrial wireless systems.

This leaves the U.S. with Michael Powell's other option - reestablishing the Bell monopolies.

1 posted on 10/03/2002 10:06:57 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


TAKE BACK THE SENATE!
VOTE OUT THE DEMS!

DONATE TODAY!!!.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD


2 posted on 10/03/2002 10:19:28 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Satellite will be a great way to deliver Internet services in Africa, South America and other third-world countries - but not the USA.

Why? Blackbird.
3 posted on 10/04/2002 1:41:51 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
"Satellite will be a great way to deliver Internet services in Africa, South America and other third-world countries - but not the USA."

The phone call that I got last month from a senior-level telecom executive revolved around the feasibility of using high-altitude robotic blimps (cost: less than $150k each - with less transmission delay, too) in lieu of satellites (cost: upwards of $100 Million each).

4 posted on 10/04/2002 1:49:14 AM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Space; tech
ping
6 posted on 10/04/2002 7:54:11 AM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Satellite will be a great way to deliver Internet services in Africa, South America and other third-world countries - but not the USA.

I worked on this project for a while, and it was chaos.

First off, they never understood that there's NO MARKET in those places. There are no phone lines there for a reason. The only place there'd be any demand for this system would be in places where people already use things like phones -- and in those places, Teledesic wouldn't have enough market share to survive. (As Iridium and Globalstar already discovered.)

The Teledesic people never did understand how to put together a system. Their requirements had no objective basis, and they were often wedded to really ruinous design choices. A clue to how bad they really were can be gained by looking at how many satellite companies they hired and fired: there were several before us, and several after -- I think the total was something like 10.

This project should have died 5 years ago.

On the plus side, they had this one blonde secretary ... oohhhh, golly what a babe. (Yes, she could type, too.)

7 posted on 10/04/2002 8:01:47 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000; *tech_index; Mathlete; Apple Pan Dowdy; grundle; beckett; billorites; One More Time; ...
Another Dotcom death!

OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST

8 posted on 10/04/2002 11:38:19 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Satellite will be a great way to deliver Internet services in Africa, South America and other third-world countries - but not the USA.

I beg to differ. Teledesic was not GEO satellite-based; it was LEO (low earth orbit) based. Unfortunately, Teledesic's constellation plan was way too ambitious, and required TONS of birds (240, I think).

LEO satellite service has relatively low latency due to the short hop (875 miles vs. 22,600 miles for GEO) to the birds.

Alcatel's LEO service, SkyBridge, only requires 67 LEO birds, is still planned for sometime this decade, and is the only way many people (including me), even in the US, where something like 50%+ will NEVER have cable or DSL, will ever get broadband service.

There has been some question as to whether Alcatel is throwing in the towel on SkyBridge, but so far they are denying it.

10 posted on 10/04/2002 12:52:25 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson