Replies

NJ is lost to RATs. That's not our fault, that's just how it is.

There was a brief, shining chance to pick up a RAT seat because the candidate was such a big crook. Now that chance is gone. The RAT court, the RAT governor, the RAT Lautenberg are all in cahoots to break the law.

That's what RATs do. If the people of NJ were wise, they wouldn't want to be represented by RATs-but they aren't, and they do.

Instead of wasting time and money plowing in a rocky field, worry about why Montana, North and South Dakota, Missouri, Louisiana, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, and West Virginia-Bush bastions all-send FOURTEEN RAT SENATORS to Washington.

Do you know how many GOP Senators there are from states where Gore got >54% of the vote? TWO, that's how many.

Going to court to stop the morons in NJ from getting the RAT they so obviously want is a waste of time and money, and will be twisted to work against GOP candidates who have a chance to win.

The GOP can go to court over matters like this AFTER we are rid of Edwards, Hollings, Cleland, Miller, Landrieu, Carnahan, Rockefeller, Byrd, Baucus, Daschle, Johnson, Dorgan and the other nameless commie from ND.

You've gotta fish where the fish are. NJ is a stagnant pool. Give it up.

I see your point,

It may have to do more with timing, in this cycle, the Dems are vulnerable so push it.

I want them to push this the the USSC not so much for the one Senate seat, but for it's effect on public sentament when the Dems get spotlighted for what they are. Specifically, to raise the ire of the conservative voters who sat out 2000 in a hissy fit and let the Dems get this close.

However, if there are other more vulnerable senate seats, then I agree with you.

I'm not willing to consider NJ a lost cause, and I bet there are other NJ FReepers who agree. The breakdown for NJ was 40% gop, 56 dem - sure, a landslide by election standards but I like to dwell on the positive - fully 40% of the voting public is conservative in NJ. And we have a good chance for the first time in 30 years to elect a Republican senator. I say fight. And if not for NJ, then fight for the basic principal of the rule of law, for constitutional integrity, for throwing this kind of thing back in the faces of liberal judges. Hey do I sound like Mr. Smith yet? :)

What really kills me is that the very same party that is fighting to take a candidate off the ballot in one state because they think their candidate will lose, is fully intending to keep a dead woman's name on the ballot in another state because they think she'll win. Proves they'll do anything to win.

NJ is a stagnant pool. Give it up.

I disagree. This should be fought on all fronts including the SCOTUS appeal. If for nothing else but to stop the circus that the election cycle has become.

NJ is lost to RATs. That's not our fault, that's just how it is.

What an utterly defeatist loser! Lautenliar still has to win and I don't think he will! It's still Forrester's to lose!

You convinced me Jim.

Forester should try his best, but you are probably right.
In my state - Colorado - Wayne Allard is in the fight of
his life with a sleezeball trial-lawyer lobbyist. And our
other republican senator - Ben Nighthorse Campbell - says
he's quitting after his present term expires. If we could
only get the truth printed for thirty days every two years
there'd never be a RAT elected.

NJ is lost to RATs. That's not our fault, that's just how it is.

(snipped)

Brilliant post. Why step on the demicrats so carefully laid landmine? "Just LOOK at those NAZI BASTARDS - going to the SUPREME COURT to TAKE THE VOTE AWAY from MINORITIES again!!!"

Feh, let'm have it. I'll trade a Lautenberg for 14 new Republican Senators any day.