 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Posted on 10/02/2002 9:23:35 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Plan B, as it simply came to be known, was born during a rare rainy evening in mid-July.
Leading Democrats from a dozen large New Jersey counties arranged a conference call to talk about the reelection campaign of Sen. Robert G. Torricelli, which they believed would be a disaster.
"Were we worried? 'Worried' wasn't the word - 'terrified' is much more like it," said one North Jersey Democrat who took part in the two-hour phone call. "We didn't care so much that Bob Torricelli was going to lose - good riddance. We cared that all the little people on the ticket were going to pay the price as well."
So at a time when most New Jerseyans were probably thinking a lot more about a shore vacation than partisan politics, Democratic leaders quietly hatched a plan to undermine Torricelli, even as the first-term incumbent prepared to fight for his political life against an unknown Republican challenger.
Interviews this week with a half-dozen party leaders show that a nervous Democratic establishment long ago resolved to rid their ticket of the hobbled U.S. Senate candidate as soon he fell behind in internal party polls.
Party leaders interviewed for this story said they would only speak on condition of anonymity. Several said they feared public statements could undermine their ability to influence party strategy in the coming weeks. Others said they had been long-time Torricelli supporters and did not want to appear critical.
Little support
The Democrats said that key party members began sending Torricelli clear messages, even before Labor Day, that they would not campaign for him as they had for Jim McGreevey in 2001 or Jon Corzine the year before. It also became clear Torricelli would have a hard time getting the Democratic vote machine cranked up for what was seen as a losing cause.
Without a strong get-out-the-vote effort on Election Day, Torricelli would be left without the critical support of his political base in population centers across the state. In recent weeks, Democratic sources said, contributions to the state party had slowed to a trickle, and many partisans feared there would not be nearly enough to mount a serious Election Day effort.
"A lot of people had decided to turn their back on 'Torch' a long time ago," one Democrat said. "I don't think it was a big surprise to them that he dropped out. I think the surprise was that he stayed in as long as he did."
So why did party leaders allow Torricelli to stay in the race so long - most importantly, beyond the mid-September deadline for easily replacing him on the ballot?
Several Democrats said efforts to dump Torricelli suffered a setback in early September, when public-opinion polls showed he was virtually tied with GOP businessman Douglas R. Forrester of West Windsor. The polls came after Torricelli was severely admonished by the Senate Judiciary Committee for improperly accepting gifts from a supporter, jailed Cresskill commodities trader David Chang.
Internal party polls showed Torricelli holding strong throughout the first two to three weeks of September. It was during that time that Torricelli successfully began to take attention off his ethical foibles and place it on Forrester, who appeared ill-prepared in two head-to-head debates.
"We knew that some elements of the party were against us, but we were gaining a ton of traction, we were making Forrester look like the goon he is," one Torricelli strategist said.
"Things were shaping up for us. We were headed in the right direction if we could keep the discussion off David Chang."
As late as last week, party leaders said, internal polls of likely voters showed that while Torricelli's support was soft, it was still sizable.
The turning point came Thursday, when the U.S. Attorney's Office released a nine-page document bolstering allegations by Chang that went beyond the matters in the Senate Ethics Committee report.
Release of the document was ordered by a federal appeals court, ruling in favor of a motion brought by news media organizations, including The Record.
At the same time, NBC-TV aired an extraordinary 38-minute jailhouse interview with Chang. Party polls showed that the interview was widely viewed in New Jersey.
Internal party polls, which focused on crucial Democratic voters, showed that Torricelli's support was dropping like a rock.
"It was looking like Torricelli would lose by as much as 60 percent to 40 percent," one party insider said.
Such a landslide, this Democrat said, could bring down the entire state Democratic ticket. Most notably, Democratic leaders feared that Rep. Rush Holt, the incumbent Democratic congressman, might lose to former state Secretary of State Buster Soaries in his central New Jersey district.
The same was true of Anne Sumers, who is vying with E. Scott Garrett, the conservative state legislator, for a congressional seat in a district that runs across the top of the state, from Bergen to Sussex counties, and is considered a GOP stronghold. And finally, Democrats were concerned that their candidates in county executive races in Bergen and Essex counties might be dragged down by Torricelli.
Democrats say Governor McGreevey and other key party leaders were working to remove Torricelli, who was invited to a Sunday evening meeting at the governor's mansion with the governor, Corzine, former state Sen. John Lynch, and George Norcross, an influential Camden County Democrat.
Different stories
All reportedly wanted Torricelli to drop - or at least consider withdrawing. But he left the meeting unconvinced that he should drop out even though he knew top Democrats were wavering.
Several sources close to Torricelli said the senator, despite his plummeting popularity, was under no pressure from party leaders in Trenton or Washington to quit the race. In fact, the sources said, he had received encouraging phone calls from Senate Majority Leader Thomas Daschle and other key Democrats. The sources said Torricelli made the decision to quit on Sunday morning all by himself, convinced that he could jeopardize Democratic control of the Senate if he fought on and lost.
"McGreevey, [U.S. Sen Jon] Corzine, Daschle, everyone tried to talk him out of it," one of the sources said. "It was Bob's decision, and Bob's alone."
But other sources told a different tale. They maintained that news of the Sunday meeting was leaked to The Wall Street Journal and other news organizations early Monday in an attempt to push Torricelli toward the door. Party leaders behind the leak were convinced that Torricelli could now never regain control of the campaign.
"It looked as if this story would not go away," said a Democratic source familiar with the meeting.
By Monday, Torricelli had no one defending him - not even Corzine, sources told The Record. Daschle and Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe were courting Bill Bradley, the former New Jersey senator who ran for president in 2000.
"The irony is that Torricelli is a brilliant man who did great things for his party and the people of New Jersey," said one Democrat close to McGreevey.
"But nobody really admired him as a person, and a lot of us couldn't stand him.
"So in the end, I think a lot of people are just relieved he's gone away."
I blame the people that live there. If that's who they want in office - I guess that's what they are willing to put up with.
The tragedy is that who is elected to Congress & the Senate does affect the rest of the country.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hmmm Maybe Maybe not!
"Toe Sucker Boy" was just on Fox and says his polling shows a 3 Seat Pick up in the Senate for the Repubs and also they retain the house!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.