Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ Supreme Court Hearing Live Thread
New Jersey Public TV ^ | 10/02/02 | TonyInOhio

Posted on 10/02/2002 7:04:20 AM PDT by TonyInOhio

New Jersey Public TV is carrying this hearing live. Click on Watch Live Online, and post what you hear, here.


Tony


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: demonrats; election; fixisin; forrester; fraud; greasetheskids; igotyourparadigm; lautenberg; ratcrimes; steal; stealingelection; toricelli
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 1,281-1,293 next last
How is 'Election Day' an 'artificial window'?
821 posted on 10/02/2002 9:19:54 AM PDT by dyed_in_the_wool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 819 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
i can relate ...
there's a stack of boards in my shop feelin' pretty abandoned 'bout now      
822 posted on 10/02/2002 9:20:10 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
I do not think Lautenberg can win. I'm from CT which is even more liberal than NJ and people from both states lost quite a few loved ones on 9/11. Old-time, dove liberals like Lautenberg just won't fly high anymore.
823 posted on 10/02/2002 9:20:10 AM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 805 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
Democrats go to court seeking to replace Torricelli's name on November ballot -AP Breaking News
JOHN P. McALPIN, Associated Press Writer
(10-02) 09:17 PDT (AP) -- AH: With BC-Torricelli-Forrester TRENTON, N.J. (AP) -- Democrats fighting a crucial battle for control of the U.S. Senate told the state's top court Wednesday it isn't too late to replace Sen. Robert Torric...

Democrats were 'terrified' at Torricelli reelection bid
Bergen Record, NJ - 2 hours ago
... reelection campaign of Sen. Robert G. Torricelli, which they believed
would be a disaster. "Were we worried? 'Worried' wasn't the ...

       The Torch burned out long ago - New Jersey Journal
       Party boosts support for GOP - New Jersey Herald

824 posted on 10/02/2002 9:20:12 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio; hole_n_one
Where's hole_n_one?
825 posted on 10/02/2002 9:20:36 AM PDT by 6ppc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
Why do 35 days matter if 51 days do not?

Because the 35 days are set by federal law, which the NJ courts don't have the right to monkey with.

826 posted on 10/02/2002 9:20:41 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 813 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
These guys are unreal. The law is 'artificial' but 'choice' is real. Up is down. Black is white. etc.
827 posted on 10/02/2002 9:20:42 AM PDT by dyed_in_the_wool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 818 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
How is this going to play with the Torch's voters? Will they stay at home? It is a good bet Torch won't stump for Laughenberg.
828 posted on 10/02/2002 9:21:00 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 805 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
You can't take dead people off the ballot if the time has passed it's the law in these cases

I'm beginning to suspect the New Jersey Supreme Court doesn't even have a passing acquaintence with the actual laws of the state. They sounds terribly uninformed.

829 posted on 10/02/2002 9:21:01 AM PDT by TX Bluebonnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 807 | View Replies]

To: rintense; Howlin
OK, I've got a fair and balanced solution, if I were (God forbid) a NJSC justice:

Let the dems have the benefit of substituting a candidate at the last moment "in the voters best interest", and:

Let the pubs pick the dem candidate they get to run. Ha!

830 posted on 10/02/2002 9:21:12 AM PDT by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
What....... they can't do that...??

If they do that USSC....moves in.....

831 posted on 10/02/2002 9:21:12 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 806 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Now they're talking about moving the certification date days after Election Day to accommodate the 35 days.

one judge even stepped in and asked for the attorney to say "yes" or "no" if that extention would be compatible federally.

Chief Justice just said "can't find 35 days anywhere". DUH

832 posted on 10/02/2002 9:21:30 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 806 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Kinda like the "Pina Colada Song"?
833 posted on 10/02/2002 9:21:34 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 804 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Time for us to bump Forrester and replace with former Governor Tom Kean. It's just unbelievable.
834 posted on 10/02/2002 9:21:37 AM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 824 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
He was certainly the last choice as they went through all of the democrat congressman and bill bradley before they came to Lautenberg. Plus, Torricelli hates his guts. In fact, there was reports that Torricelli only agreed to withdraw provided that Lautenberg was not his replacement. Torricelli should have known better than to trust the democrats. Sheesh.

And based on Lautenberg's press conference yesterday, I can see why Lautenberg was their last choice. The guy is 78 and appears to have some sort of dementia. He didn't make any sense at all. Having said all that, I think he will win. This is New Jersey, afterall.

835 posted on 10/02/2002 9:21:44 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 787 | View Replies]

To: Huck
One Justice is asking about extending the window of allowing ballots to come in (military) for a few more days...give them a bit more time...but the 35 day window is to get the ballots out and returned, not counted ??

New Justice says "I can't find 35 days anywhere" -- what the heck do these justices do ?? earlier one guy siad..."Can you explain this to me, I don't quite get it"

Cheez-n-crackers

836 posted on 10/02/2002 9:21:45 AM PDT by twyn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 811 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
Actually it is on newjersy public tv available on line (www.njn.net)

I've been listening throughout. The justices were moderately tough on the 'RATs, but have been brutal on the 'Pubbie lawyer who sounds like an idiot to me.

They didn't even finish the motion to joint the state 'Pubbie party? DOLT - call the federalist society, anything, to get the lawyers to do the work!!

The 'Pubbie lawyer soulds legalistic and hesitant, sounds like fool to me. Very scary. There is no question in my mind, based on 20 years in practice, that they will hold for the Democrats.

837 posted on 10/02/2002 9:21:51 AM PDT by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies]

To: TX Bluebonnet
We have a new KANGAROO COURT !!!
838 posted on 10/02/2002 9:21:53 AM PDT by coder2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies]

To: twigs
Now that the party has done the one thing he asked them not to do--replace him with Lautenberg--he might do anything. One hopes.

I don't know how legally accurate this can be, but another thread reads: Torch Transfers Campaign Warchest to Lautenberg. If this is remotely true, then Torch might be getting the screws tightened by the rest of the Demons.

839 posted on 10/02/2002 9:22:04 AM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies]

To: All
These justices are playing Twister in order to find ways to change the name on the ballot.

Their most impressive move is where they have all put their heads.

The second Republican attorney was great, but this case is over.
840 posted on 10/02/2002 9:22:06 AM PDT by Freeper 007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 794 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 1,281-1,293 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson