Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ Supreme Court Hearing Live Thread
New Jersey Public TV ^ | 10/02/02 | TonyInOhio

Posted on 10/02/2002 7:04:20 AM PDT by TonyInOhio

New Jersey Public TV is carrying this hearing live. Click on Watch Live Online, and post what you hear, here.


Tony


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: demonrats; election; fixisin; forrester; fraud; greasetheskids; igotyourparadigm; lautenberg; ratcrimes; steal; stealingelection; toricelli
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,281-1,293 next last
To: twigs
This situation reminds me of a baseball game, where the opposing managers each take turns bringing on then replacing pitchers and pinch-hitters LOL
181 posted on 10/02/2002 7:49:25 AM PDT by calvin sun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sanchmo
speculation among Republicans. Some, he said, believe that if Democrats are allowed to replace Torricelli with a well-known candidate like Lautenberg, Republicans should consider responding in kind with someone like Kean.

Well, I'm glad the GOP has thought of this. This is the
point that SOMEONE on the republican side should be
screaming from the rooftops, IMHO.
If the rats can pull this whenever they have a candidate losing,
then so can the GOP. For that reason alone, this can just not be allowed.
182 posted on 10/02/2002 7:49:27 AM PDT by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
I agree with you. Probably on Saturday!
183 posted on 10/02/2002 7:49:49 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: jonathanmo
The FEMALE JUSTICE must be related to Ginsberg. Now she's arguing the case FOR the rat lawyer.
184 posted on 10/02/2002 7:49:59 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
The NJ Juctices are doing a better job presenting the RAt case than the RAT lawyer.
185 posted on 10/02/2002 7:50:06 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Losing the senate would be catastrophic.

LOL -- but it's really NOT funny -- I think the fix is in too (color-coded absentee ballot suggestion, only 4 ballots returned, other states allow replacement up until the day before...etc...)

186 posted on 10/02/2002 7:50:13 AM PDT by twyn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Torricelli has not even hinted that if he were re-elected he would not serve. Therefore, the Court could order Torricelli to remain on the ballot based on his implied promise upon being nominated.
187 posted on 10/02/2002 7:50:17 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: jonathanmo
Exactly! This is another slippery slope of a decision that will undermine the election process in years to come.
188 posted on 10/02/2002 7:50:19 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Justice (female) with real east coast accent asks Rat lawyer second softball question--New York law says failure to meet deadline is fatal; New Jersey statute does not. What does that mean.

Sounds like one vote for the Rats.
189 posted on 10/02/2002 7:50:23 AM PDT by TheConservator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
One Justice responds to 'Rat - "this case presents a new paradigm"
190 posted on 10/02/2002 7:51:04 AM PDT by TonyInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: jonathanmo
Exactly. Why are not the minor party candidates raising Hell?
191 posted on 10/02/2002 7:51:08 AM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
I agree, the fix is in.

The judges are only primping for the TV clip that will be on the evening news.

What a pile of crap!!

192 posted on 10/02/2002 7:51:33 AM PDT by irishfest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: rintense
This court is really trying hard to get some reason to bend the law. I'm flabbergasted that these justices even have a law degree.
193 posted on 10/02/2002 7:51:36 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: SternTrek
"This case presents a new paradigm"- RATS are going to lose-
either here or at SCOTUS who should be very tired of the Dems.
194 posted on 10/02/2002 7:51:38 AM PDT by Helms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: twyn1
Is the Dem lawyer making a case like "hey...it's only a few absentee ballots (and NONE of them are military) so tough luck if you filled yours out in a timely manner and returned it already" ???

This might play in the SCONJ. It won't work at the SCOTUS.

195 posted on 10/02/2002 7:51:52 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
Man, I hope every third party is watching this and is planning an attack- especially the Constitution Party candidate!
196 posted on 10/02/2002 7:52:02 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
New York law says failure to meet deadline is fatal; New Jersey statute does not. What does that mean.

Bad thing was she preceded the statement with "Let me give you a present."

197 posted on 10/02/2002 7:52:10 AM PDT by ladtx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: jonathanmo
What are the other parties in the election saying about this?
198 posted on 10/02/2002 7:52:40 AM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: rintense
I think they'll just say the New Jersey laws suck and let them do it.
199 posted on 10/02/2002 7:52:44 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Yup That is what he said. and Rehnquist et al. will not like that....
200 posted on 10/02/2002 7:52:49 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,281-1,293 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson