[Tumbleweed_Connection]

WIPE THE SMILE OFF OF THIS MAN’S FACE.
VOTE THE RATS
OUT!! DONATE TODAY
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate here by secure server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

[Pistolshot]

There is not one post on DU on this, not one.

Another indication of where the Dumocraps have their heads.

[copycat]

Does NJ have any of those silly "right of the voter is tantamount" laws like FLA did?

[Question_Assumptions]

Democratic Gov. James E. McGreevey said that placing a new candidate on the ballot would be a fair way to resolve the issue and would "give New Jersey voters a chance to speak."

Uh, the New Jersey voters were going to speak. You just didn't like what they were going to say. There wouldn't be an "issue" to resolve if you would just take the will of the voters like a man.

[Wissa]

Democratic Gov. James E. McGreevey said that placing a new candidate on the ballot would be a fair way to resolve the issue and would "give New Jersey voters a chance to speak."

Seems to me that leaving the Torch's name on the ballot would be the best way to "give New Jersey voters a chance to speak."

[StarFan]

The misleading title all but made my dinner come up. For a moment I thought they okayed the right to put another candidate on the ballot. Whew

Pallone said Tuesday he would consider replacing Torricelli, but added that he had not been asked. Lautenberg said he would "seriously consider serving again if asked." An associate said it was unlikely Bradley would accept. Calls to other potential candidates were not immediately returned.

Latest from Fox is that Pallone never checked with his wife and has now rescinded his offer which only leaves Lautenberg (The Torch's arch rival and someone he does not want to replace him, as if he has veto power).

[Don Munn]

So let's see if I have my score card correct.

The RATS are trying to keep a dead person on the ballot in Hawaii and get a politically dead one off the ballot in New Jersey.

Hey Rocky watch me pull an election out of my hat.

Is it a honest election?

Nope.

[Southack]

Ummmm, Barry Albin is ALSO on the New Jersey Supreme Court...

Results: Individual Donors Search

9 records found in 5.67 seconds. SEARCH CRITERIA: Donor name: albin Donor state: NJ Election cycle(s): 2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990 Start another search

Sort by Name Sort by Date Sort by Amount

Contributor	Occupation	Date	Amount	Recipient
ALBIN, BARRY EAST BRUNSW, NJ 08816	WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER	5/12/1998	$500	Committee for Working Families
ALBIN, BARRY EAST BRUNSWICK, NJ 08816	WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZA	5/22/2000	$1,000	Lapolla, Michael J
ALBIN, BARRY WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095	ATTORNEY	10/28/1996	$1,000	Torricelli, Robert G
ALBIN, BARRY WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095	ATTORNEY	3/26/1996	$500	Torricelli, Robert G
ALBIN, BARRY T EAST BRUINSWICK, NJ 08816	WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER	2/23/1999	$1,000	Torricelli, Robert G
ALBIN, BARRY T EAST BRUNSWICK, NJ 08816	WILENTZ ET AL	5/17/1995	$500	Lautenberg, Frank R

[Vidalia]

" David Chang, who told investigators he gave the senator Italian suits and an $8,100 Rolex watch, "

That's a half-assed Rolex, which shows just how much real weight the corrupt bastard carried...

[Rome2000]

Look for these degenerate kangaroos to throw sheets to the wind and come out with an opinion that makes the GOP look like they are the ones who are breaking the law by refusing to let the latest democrat election theft attempt go forward unopposed.

The Jersey Supreme court is another democrat rubber stamp outfit.

The real damage they and their kind do is to the rule of law in the USA.

Apparently the law is meaningless to the Democrats, and they can continue to run roughshod over it wherever they hold a majority.

Forrester will kick the ass of any rat SOB the DNC and the rats can dig up from mothballs, even that idiot Lautenberg.

[SwinneySwitch]

"I'm in a debate with a faceless foe that I cannot find, minds I cannot change."

Try www.freerepublic.com, Torch!

[tomahawk]

There is no legal basis to do what the Democrats are trying to do. None. If the NJ Supreme Court allows them to do so, it is a kangeroo court made up of DemonCrap political hacks who do not recognize the rule of law, in violation of their oaths.

[Scott from the Left Coast]

A Republic is a government of laws not men. However, it appears now that "might" makes right. And that we are a government of Judges not laws. Whatever it takes to win -- the law of the jungle -- apparently rules American politics.

Clintonisms sad legacy to America: Its end.

[dennisw]

Judicial hacktivism at it's finest.

[jackbill]

Torricelli asked to have his name removed, either of his own volition or under pressure from the DemocRAT party.

Now the DemocRAT party is asking the NJ Supreme Court to ignore the law so that "NJ voters will have a choice".

Sorta like the Menendez brothers who, after killing their parents, asked the court to have mercy on them because they are orphans.

[Publius Maximus]

Torricelli's end to his scandal-tainted re-election campaign forced Democrats to scramble for a candidate.

A classic case of mistaking cause for effect: Democrats lust for power forces Torricelli to end his scandal-tainted re-election campaign after polls reveal his certain defeat, prompting a scramble for a new candidate at the last minute.

[jackbill]

After thinking about it for a while, I've come to the conclusion that the NJ Supremes will most likely not allow the Torch's name to be replaced with someone else. It's called "precedence". Unless they can come up with some peculiarity about this specific election, if they allow the DemocRATs to prevail, every time in the future, when a candidate is losing, he can quit and get replaced by someone else. That's a nightmare and I doubt that the NJ Supremes would want that.

[nightdriver]

"Federal prosecutors investigated but decided against filing charges against him."

Of course not. He's a democRAT. They get special priveleges with prosecutors. No matter who was sicced on X42, they always let him slide.

Drives me nuts!

[CyberAnt]

You know ... something bothers me about this Torricelli thing.

I can't help but think that Torch is doing this on purpose to embarrass the dems. Why else would x42 call the Torch 3 times to beg him to stay on?? (at least that's what Torch said).

Anybody else think this??

[Humidston]

The state Supreme Court decided Tuesday to hear arguments

Wow. That's a surprise. They're going to actually hear arguments?

They've already made their ruling and guess who won!