Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TOCH QUITS TOADY.....SENATE NOW UNDER REPUBLICAN CONTROL?
9-30-02 | Rash32

Posted on 09/30/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by Rash32

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Arkie2
It's a misspelling of BUMP.
41 posted on 09/30/2002 12:11:45 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dead
Yeah, the Toch is such a looser.</joke>
42 posted on 09/30/2002 12:13:17 PM PDT by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: writmeister
I am not sure that the location of statute will control, but that is an argument. However, the language of the statute is very clear in its application to a a U.S. Sentate seat becoming vacant for a reason other than expiration of the term. That is exactly what would happen if Torch resigned at the end of October. My guess is that it was placed in the section of the code dealing with special elections because it permits the Governer to set a special election, not because of any express or implied limitation.

If this all gets litigated, I think the U.S. Supreme Court will rule in favor of Forrester and limit the application of the N.J. statute, but then the Dims will argue that both the presidency and the Senate were selected by the Court. Ugly.
43 posted on 09/30/2002 12:24:34 PM PDT by Kaisersrsic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kaisersrsic
In federal general elections, the United States Code mandates that the election be held in the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. 2 USC §1, 7.

The United States Constitution proscribes six-year terms of office and the placement of seats in specific classes mandating the end of their terms. US Const. Art I §3(1) & (2).

The United States Supreme Court has interpreted the Times, Place and Manner clause as mandating the November general election and held that any conflicting state stautes are inoperative so far as the conflict extends. Foster v. Love, 532 US 67, 118 SC 464, 139 LE2d 369 (1997).

44 posted on 09/30/2002 12:26:22 PM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Rash32
Are you Merchan Seaman?
45 posted on 09/30/2002 12:46:06 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: writmeister
proscribes

Is this what you mean?

Main Entry: pro·scribe

Pronunciation: prO-'skrIb

Function: transitive verb

Inflected Form(s): pro·scribed; pro·scrib·ing

Etymology: Latin proscribere to publish, proscribe, from pro- before + scribere to write -- more at SCRIBE

Date: 1560

1 : to publish the name of as condemned to death with the property of the condemned forfeited to the state

2 : to condemn or forbid as harmful or unlawful : PROHIBIT

46 posted on 09/30/2002 12:55:21 PM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Or is it Peter Tosh?

yes

47 posted on 09/30/2002 12:58:39 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HIDEK6
Oops. Typo. I think that should have been prescribe.
48 posted on 09/30/2002 1:00:10 PM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
You mean "Baghdad Babs?"
49 posted on 09/30/2002 1:02:23 PM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
And if he does that, then there will be no election in Nov and the replacement will serve for 2 years.

No, the replacement will finish out Torchy's term.
50 posted on 09/30/2002 1:03:39 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
No, the replacement will finish out Torchy's term.

Or not.
51 posted on 09/30/2002 1:08:28 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Rash32
Which toady did he quit? Daschle??
52 posted on 09/30/2002 1:13:17 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
No, the replacement will finish out Torchy's term.

I said that in the next sentence!

53 posted on 09/30/2002 1:32:53 PM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
I wonder if a case can be made that these laws don't apply when the people involved are trying to use them to circumvent an election in order to avoid losing the seat for their political party. There's a big difference between what they're doing and a Senator getting killed in a car accident or by an irate husband.
54 posted on 09/30/2002 2:20:02 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Former New York City mayor Ed Koch?
55 posted on 09/30/2002 7:35:43 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rash32

The Human Toch

56 posted on 09/30/2002 7:46:11 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson