Win one for the Gipper! God Bless You Reagan, We Will Never Forget Your Great Service and Leadership - We here on FR will carry on your great work with diligence. Thanks for the Memories and Inspiration!
You got THAT right !! And that goes for all aspects RE: our safety, just don't think the govt is going to do it for you. We are on our own, yet I see too many people that have become very complacent...
A question I am sure many of us wonder about.
And, the first anthrax death was just an "isolated case," nothing to worry about; and the shoe bomber was just an "isolated nut," nothing to worry about; and Ahmed "Dirty Bomb" Padilla (or whatever the hell his name is) is just an "isolated fanatic," nothing to worry about.
Well, I'm worryin'.
America's Fifth Column ... watch PBS documentary JIHAD! In America
New Link: Download 8 Mb zip file here (60 minute video)
I think it's possible, but why would they limit themselves to "low-grade"? It's also possible the virus got here in a load of produce or something. Not to discount the damage it has done, because people have died, and that's a bad thing. But putting some perspective on it, I wonder how many have died from the common cold, or the flu, or pneumonia in the past year? I'd bet quite a few more than have died from this virus.
http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/wncount.htm
BRING BACK DDT
U.S. Department of State
International Information Program
05 June 2002
A State Department official has reaffirmed the Bush administration's belief that Cuba has a "limited, developmental, offensive biological warfare research and development effort" and that the Caribbean nation has provided "dual-use biotechnology to rogue states."
Testifying June 5 before a Senate subcommittee, Carl Ford, assistant secretary of state for intelligence and research, said the United States is "concerned that such technology could support biological warfare programs" in those rogue nations.
Ford said Cuba has several facilities involved in biological-related efforts in agriculture, medicine, and veterinary science, "which, as in any country, could be used for illicit purposes." This "dual-use problem," Ford said, "presents all who are committed to combating" the biological warfare threat "with the dilemma of how best to assess the capabilities of any given facility against the intent to develop biological weapons."
The nature of biological weapons makes it "difficult to procure clear, incontrovertible proof that a country is engaged in illicit biological weapons research, production, weaponization, and stockpiling," Ford told an open session of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere, Peace Corps, and Narcotics Affairs. A closed session was scheduled to follow the open forum.
Ford added that Cuba's "sophisticated denial and deception practices make our task even more difficult." But he added that the State Department has a "sound basis" for making its judgment about Cuba's effort in illicit biological weapons research. Ford said he was "necessarily limiting" his public comments on the subject to the subcommittee because of the need to protect sensitive intelligence information. He said he was prepared to discuss the evidence in a closed session.
Following is the text of his prepared remarks:
INTELLIGENCE STATEMENT BY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTELLIGENCE AND RESEARCH CARL W. FORD JR. BEFORE THE SENATE SUBCOMMITTEE ON WESTERN HEMISPHERE, PEACE CORPS, AND NARCOTICS AFFAIRS, SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
June 5, 2002
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
It is my pleasure to come before the Subcommittee today to discuss the issue of what we in the Bureau of Intelligence and Research assess to be Cuba's efforts to date in the area of biological warfare. My remarks in this open forum will necessarily be limited owing to the need to protect sensitive intelligence information, but I would welcome the opportunity and am prepared to give classified remarks in a closed session.
On March 19, in my statement in front of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, I stated INR's judgment that:
The United States believes that Cuba has at least a limited, developmental, offensive biological warfare research and development effort. Cuba has provided dual-use biotechnology to rogue states. We are concerned that such technology could support BW programs in those states.
That assessment and our concerns have not changed in the intervening 2 and half months.
Among the various weapons of mass destruction (WMD) disciplines, biological warfare (BW) is perhaps the most difficult to clearly identify, absent unambiguous reliable intelligence information, owing to the dual-use nature of the technology and materials used to support a BW program. In today's world, many nations, including Cuba, have in place robust biotechnology infrastructures, as some of the world's best scientific talent has turned to this avenue of modern science to promote medical and agricultural advances in their countries. Distinguishing legitimate biotech work from work that is pursued to support either offensive or defensive BW efforts or programs continues to be a difficult intelligence challenge. In a nutshell, since basic BW production does not require large, sophisticated programs or facilities it makes the intelligence assessment function more complicated.
Cuba has several facilities involved in biological-related efforts in agriculture, medicine and veterinary science, which, as in any country, could be used for illicit purposes. This dual-use problem presents all who are committed to combating the BW threat with the dilemma of how best to assess the capabilities of any given facility against the intent to develop biological weapons.
What then can I say about the evidence for our assessment? The nature of biological weapons makes it difficult to procure clear, incontrovertible proof that a country is engaged in illicit biological weapons research, production, weaponization and stockpiling. Cuba's sophisticated denial and deception practices make our task even more difficult. That said we have a sound basis for our judgment that Cuba has at least a limited, developmental, offensive biological warfare research and development effort. I am prepared to discuss the evidence we do have in a closed session or leave behind a classified statement for the record.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.