Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McBride/McAuliffe Seeks to Block Funding Probe
Miami Herald ^ | 9/25/02 | Peter Wallsten

Posted on 09/25/2002 9:23:19 PM PDT by windchime

McBride seeks to block funding probe

BY PETER WALLSTEN pwallsten@herald.com

TALLAHASSEE - Hoping to shield a controversial political committee that pumped nearly $2 million into TV ads boosting Bill McBride's candidacy for governor, the candidate's campaign and the committee are going to court to block a state investigation.

The legal maneuvers come as the Florida Elections Commission has sent questionnaires to McBride and state teachers' union president Maureen Dinnen -- whose group set up the committee -- seeking sworn statements concerning what they knew about the ads and when they knew it.

The court filings set up a potentially nasty -- and high-profile -- legal battle between a Democratic nominee looking to compete against Gov. Jeb Bush's massive political machine and a GOP incumbent seeking to thwart McBride's every effort.

The Democrats have hired two top-gun attorneys, former 2000 recount lawyer Ron Meyer representing the teachers' union committee and prominent criminal defense lawyer Bob Harper for the McBride campaign.

GAVE MOMENTUM

The ads, paid for by a new corporation called Florida Education Association Quality Public Education Corporation Inc., were credited with giving McBride the momentum he needed to engineer his stunning upset over former U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno in the Sept. 10 primary.

They also gave the former unknown Tampa lawyer enhanced name recognition, putting him in better position to challenge Bush.

But the ads, which featured a biographical sketch of McBride dating back to his days as a Marine in Vietnam, came under fire since they debuted in July.

For starters, the teachers' union kept secret the list of donors to QPEC, creating the corporation in July under a provision in the federal tax code that allows so-called ''issue advocacy'' groups to shield their contributors.

GOP COMPLAINT

The Republican Party complained that the ads broke the law because they specifically endorsed McBride rather than espousing a particular cause or issue. State laws require that so-called issue advocacy groups stick to pushing ideas, not individuals. The GOP's complaint contended that if the ads did not qualify as issue advocacy, they were then simply contributions to McBride's campaign -- and exceeded the $500 limit on such donations.

The FEC voted last month to investigate based on the GOP complaint.

Lawyers for McBride and the committee, however, argue that the ads were perfectly legal.

In court papers filed late last week in Lakeland and Tallahassee, the lawyers argue that the FEC inquiry threatens the committee's constitutional rights.

ADS PULLED OFF

The union voluntarily pulled the ads off the air after the inquiry began and some TV stations expressed concern.

''What's at stake here is whether the Florida Elections Commission may properly go on with this kind of fishing expedition and chill the free exercise of speech and association that QPEC and its members have,'' said Meyer.

But Republican strategists worry that, if the committee is allowed to continue, McBride will enjoy a ''stealth'' campaign operation financed by unknown contributors.

The GOP has raised additional questions about the ties between the Democratic candidate and the teachers' union since the campaign announced last week that the union's leading lobbyist would be McBride's new campaign manager.

QPEC is required by law to reveal its donors to date in a federal tax filing next month, but it will be free to raise money without further disclosure through the Nov. 5 election.

'The teachers' union purchased the primary for Bill McBride,'' said Bush campaign spokesman Todd Harris. ``When an organization is spending millions and millions of dollars to elect somebody governor, the public has a right to know where that money comes from.''

The questionnaires sent to McBride and Dinnen suggest that the FEC is examining how closely the campaign, its media consultant David Doak and QPEC were tied when the ads were produced.

Doak produced McBride ads both for the teachers' committee and for the campaign itself.

In an affidavit, investigators ask McBride whether he was aware that QPEC planned the ads, whether an ''agent of your campaign'' helped create the ads, whether he gave QPEC the photographs used in the commercial, and if his campaign sought advice as to whether the commercials exceeded contribution limits.

McBride spokesman Alan Stonecipher declined to say whether QPEC and the teachers' union campaign coordinated efforts, referring to laws requiring FEC investigations to be kept confidential.

But he said the campaign would not oppose releasing the list of donors to QPEC.

''If it were up to us we'd go ahead and have them disclosed sooner rather than later,'' Stonecipher said. ``There's nothing that anybody will be surprised about.''

Meyer said Tuesday that the teachers' union did not act in collaboration with the campaign, and that the two organizations held separate contracts with Doak.

''The FEA and the teachers and education employees of Florida knew very well what they wanted to do,'' Meyer said. ``They didn't need to be invited by the McBride campaign.''


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election; florida; governor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: windchime
legal battle between a Democratic nominee looking to compete against Gov. Jeb Bush's massive political machine and a GOP incumbent seeking to thwart McBride's every effort.

Anyone notice the bias from the Miami Herald ?

21 posted on 09/25/2002 10:08:09 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windchime
ov. Jeb Bush's massive political machine and a GOP incumbent seeking to thwart McBride's every effort.

Funny, never see them term, say, Gray Davis in this way, and he is the king of massive politial machines. Such propaganda. It is obvious this group of thieves have something to hide here, but then, we knew that in advance.

22 posted on 09/25/2002 10:09:15 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Well, gosh - we wouldn't want to hold the RATS accountable, would we? I mean, that's just plain unfair...there are no laws for RATS...don't you know that yet? /sarcasm
23 posted on 09/25/2002 10:10:56 PM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
read post 21 and send an email to this guy. I just did. His email address is in the article.
24 posted on 09/25/2002 10:13:11 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth; All
Read post 21 and complain to the Herald about bias. click here for the email form
25 posted on 09/25/2002 10:26:02 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
read post 25 and click and send an email to the herald to complain.
26 posted on 09/25/2002 10:28:10 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All
I missed the change in campaign managers the first time I read this. Perhaps the removal of McAuliffe's father-in-law as campaign manager is to nestle McAuliffe deeper into the shadows of this campaign. Perhaps the Bush campaign was going to use it and they found out.???

They are very determined! We need to think the same way we would if JEB's opponent was one of the Clintons. This denial of information to FEC could even be a diversion while they play some underhanded game of another kind.

Links to suspicious events in lower profile campaigns:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/756412/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/757175/posts

We need to watch this campaign just as we watch for terrorist activity.
27 posted on 09/25/2002 10:43:18 PM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Wow, good stuff. Looks like from your posts that you've been following this issue closely.
28 posted on 09/25/2002 10:47:14 PM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: windchime
Note to Repubs:

Hey, geniuses, if the Demos never obeyed the campaign finance laws in the past, why were you so eager to pass more laws?

And if no one ever prosecuted any Demos in the past, why would you think anyone would prosecute them in the future?

Could Repubs best be characterized as suicidal? or suckers? Someone help me here.

Note to Demos:

Not to worry. If anyone says anything, just say that what happened is further proof of the need for more campaign finance reform, which the Republicans continue to oppose. Works every time.
29 posted on 09/25/2002 11:10:03 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
"They spent over $5 million in the primary ..."

"The union collects $183.50 a year from each of its members, which calculates to more than $20 million a year."

Am I reading this correctly ... did they spend 1/4 of their annual budget just to win the primary? Is it reasonable for any organization to spend 25% of its receipts on a political campaign?

30 posted on 09/25/2002 11:30:12 PM PDT by SWake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor; Coop; Torie; crasher; Free the USA; Fish out of Water; deport; Dog Gone
Things that make one go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
31 posted on 09/26/2002 12:25:06 AM PDT by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21


32 posted on 09/26/2002 1:12:08 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Just when you think the Dims are as low as they can go, they reach down to new depths of corruption.
33 posted on 09/26/2002 2:22:41 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marron
"why were you so eager to pass more laws?"

In regard to Republicans and campaign finance laws, I'm clueless. Makes one consider many possibilities without reaching a solid conclusion.

"Not to worry. If anyone says anything, just say that what happened is further proof of the need for more campaign finance reform, which the Republicans continue to oppose. Works every time."

The dems do have a way with words. They can turn any issue around on a dime!
34 posted on 09/26/2002 6:32:37 AM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Ain't that the TRUTH!

BTW what are you doing posting at 4 AM? Do you ever sleep?

35 posted on 09/26/2002 7:13:02 AM PDT by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
Thanks for the ping, Julie. (^:
But when it comes to core ideology, no one in the field outflanks him on the left. That, of course, could be a ruinous niche nationally, but not statewide.

He's unabashedly supportive of public schools and teachers and activist on behalf of the environment and minority inclusion. He sees the value in unions and the good in affirmative action. He believes gays and lesbians should enjoy the same legal rights and benefits as married couples. He is, as he has said, a "proud and unapologetic Democrat."

"To suggest that any private school is better than a public school is disgraceful…" Bill McBride.
Link


How are you going to pay for those new school improvements you say we need, Mr. McBride?

A new 50-cent per pack tax on cigarettes, used only for schools, would produce almost $600 million a year, he said.

Removing sales tax exemptions on some items such as stadium skyboxes and tanning salons could up the total to almost $1 billion, he said.
Link


New taxes to pay for McBride and the teachers unions' "Class Size" amendment scheme? The most detailed critique of the expensive folly that is the Class Size Amendment can be found at FloridaTaxWatch.org, a group Alex Sink, McBride's own wife, was affiliated with. Florida can't afford this bill, nor this Bill.

Another opinion:

CLASS SIZE AMENDMENT WOULD HANDCUFF EDUCATION AND GOVERNMENT

A seemingly well-intentioned constitutional amendment that proposes smaller class sizes could significantly cripple K-12 schools, community colleges and universities if it passes. If this amendment passes, we will almost immediately need 32,000 new teachers, new classrooms at a cost of $9 billion, and another $2.5 billion to pay for the new teachers -- and $2.5 billion is more than it costs to run all 11 of our public universities to give you a reference point for the cost of this bad amendment. (continue

Link
It isn't difficult to find this info. Why can't the press?

Incidentally, Florida press:
Is Jeb actually ahead of the curve on education? The jury's in - and they side with: Jeb.
JEB Gets An "A" (Wall Street Journal)

36 posted on 09/26/2002 7:20:53 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
what are you doing posting at 4 AM? Do you ever sleep?

When our kids let us. Our baby girl was crying for another bottle, and I couldn't get back to sleep after taking care of that. All in a day's work... !

37 posted on 09/26/2002 8:04:10 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
When our kids let us. Our baby girl was crying for another bottle, and I couldn't get back to sleep after taking care of that. All in a day's work... !

Yes...remember those days very well....with 4 sons...seems like we were sleep deprived for decades....LOL

38 posted on 09/26/2002 8:09:40 AM PDT by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson