In 1991 Prime Time Al "sold" his vote on Desert Storm to the party that would give him the most Senate floor time.
You have about as much chance of a successful "comeback" as Phil Donahue. But don't let that stop you from pulling a "Ralph Nader" on whoever the Democraps nominate. (Oh, BTW - when you get your butt kicked in the primaries, be sure to demand at least 5 or 6 recounts... that'll show those snotty Democrats that they never deserved a candidate of your caliber anyway...lol)
I nominate Al Gore for the "Jim Traficant/Cynthia McKinney Award", to be given annually to the Democratic politician who embarrasses the party the worst. (Although the fact is, after Clinton, we may never get a chance to give this award, since it's obvious that Democrats are beyond normal shame or embarrassment.)
Well worth sharing this one. . .
-Al Gore, in Feb. 12, 2002 speech to Council on Foreign Relations.
Full Transcript of Feb 12, 2002 speech
On May 23,2000 vice president and presidential candidate Al Gore made the following remarks about Iraq:
"We have made it clear that it is our policy to see Saddam Hussein gone. We have sought coalitions of opponents to challenge his power from within or without. I have met with the Iraqi resistance, and I have invited them to meet with me again next month when I will encourage them to further unite in their efforts against Saddam. We have maintained sanctions in the face of rising criticism, while improving the oil-to-food program to help the Iraqi people directly. We have used force when necessary. And we will not let up in our efforts to free Iraq from Saddam's rule. Should he think of challenging us, I would strongly advise against it. As a Senator, I voted for the use of force. As Vice President, I supported the use of force. And if entrusted with the Presidency, my resolve will never waver. "
For those who were paying attention back in 1993, an event occurred which should have alerted us that this Gore fellow is either not terribly bright or has major short-term memory problems. While his college transcripts (and flunking out of divinity school) make that case far better than I could here, that event demonstrated at least to me something far more troubling in this guys intellectual chemistry.
In January of 1993, Clinton and Gore apparently to cement their bone fides as men of da peeple, organized a bus tour prior to their triumphant entry into Washington for their inauguration on January 20th. Their final stop before heading up to DC was at Monticello, Jeffersons home atop that beautiful mountain in Charlottesville, Virginia. Mr. Jeffersons final resting place is also there just down the slope from that grand house.
During the visit which was covered live by C-SPAN and watched with interest as it unfolded by this humble writer Gore was conducted on a tour of the home by the one of the Park Service guides. At one point, Gore was shown a group of portraits identified by the guide as Washington, Franklin and Madison. (For what its worth, your humble writer possibly because I went through the government school system BEFORE the PC crowd and the NEA took it over -- recognized these Founding Fathers BEFORE the guide spoke.)
These portraits hang on a relatively short wall flanked on either side by a doorway. Gore spent a few moments contemplating the images of three of the leading Founding Fathers of the nation he and his new pal, Bill Clinton, would soon lead. Gore and the guide then strolled through the door to their right and though off camera could be heard making comments as they apparently viewed the portraits on the other side of this same wall.
About a minute or so later, Gore and the guide came back into view through the LEFT door and back to the SAME wall upon which hung the portraits of Washington, Franklin and Madison. Gore looked at them and, motioning to them, asked the guide AND WHO ARE THESE FELLOWS? Who are THESE fellows??
I still recall my incredulity at the depth of the abysmal IGNORANCE of his question. No, strike that. Given that just a few minutes earlier Gore had seen these same portraits, the STUPIDITY of the question! There is no other term for it.
As I have reflected on that incredibly revealing incident during the years since, another frightening thought flooded in on me: This was a guy who, at the time of that Monticello visit in January of 1993, had served in public office at the national level for some 16 years and DID NOT RECOGNIZE THREE OF THE MEN WHO WERE INSTRUMENTAL IN CREATING THE VERY SYSTEM IN WHICH HE SERVED!
Anyone want to take a shot at how many times this guy had actually READ the Constitution he had by then sworn an oath to God to preserve, protect and defend it from all enemies, both foreign and domestic MULTIPLE times? Who protects the Constitution from HIM? If you care enough to have read this far, you recognize THAT as a rhetorical question.
I thought I could hear a soft whirring sound in the background as Gore and Clinton used Monticello as a prop to further what was to become the most Constitution defying, scandal plagued administration in our history. I now believe it was Mr. Jefferson reaching speeds of 3,600 RPM in his grave down the hill.
A bit later in this same visit to Monticello, Bill and Al appeared on little stools on the porch. All that was missing were the little dunce caps. Assembled before them were a few hundred dutifully smiling and appreciative DC school kids trucked in as props.
During the clearly scripted Q & A by the kids, one of them asked Bill and Al why they wanted to go to Washington. I dont recall exactly what Bill said (but Im sure we all could come pretty close). I do, however, remember PRECISLY a portion of what Al said: To make the world MORE BETTER for kids like them. MORE BETTER?
And this guy was a journalist?
The Gore Disinformation Squad tells us that Dubya is not too bright?
Give me break!
Maybe Gore knows something we do "not" know!!!
"I have not raised those doubts, but many have."
Gutless faggot.
As others have pointed out, this is a lie. The whole point of the operation was surprise, the implementers are dead, the planners were few to keep the operation undetectable, and many of the sponsors have been dealt with financially and diplomatically.
I oppose attacking Iraq but I must say Gore makes me lean the other way. Specifically I despise the notion that we should care what the international community thinks. If it is in U.S. interests to attack Iraq then we should attack, period.
Wow, for a moment there,I thought Michael Kelly was referring to the Character Traits of One "Shrillary Rotten Clinton".(As a matter of fact,he subconsciously was doing just that.)