Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Seattle Times calls AlGore for what he is.
1 posted on 09/25/2002 6:58:22 AM PDT by too-taxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: too-taxed
Despicable
2 posted on 09/25/2002 7:00:58 AM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
Call me cynical, but I smell Hillary.
3 posted on 09/25/2002 7:01:36 AM PDT by MattinNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
We can only hope that Michael Kelly represents the consensus.
4 posted on 09/25/2002 7:08:07 AM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
Remember, this is an individual with no moral compass.

In 1991 Prime Time Al "sold" his vote on Desert Storm to the party that would give him the most Senate floor time.

5 posted on 09/25/2002 7:08:48 AM PDT by Republic If You Can Keep It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
Leave it to the Irish to understate their displeasure.....
7 posted on 09/25/2002 7:11:00 AM PDT by pgobrien
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
Run Al Run. Please. You and Rev'rund Al, as well.

You have about as much chance of a successful "comeback" as Phil Donahue. But don't let that stop you from pulling a "Ralph Nader" on whoever the Democraps nominate. (Oh, BTW - when you get your butt kicked in the primaries, be sure to demand at least 5 or 6 recounts... that'll show those snotty Democrats that they never deserved a candidate of your caliber anyway...lol)

I nominate Al Gore for the "Jim Traficant/Cynthia McKinney Award", to be given annually to the Democratic politician who embarrasses the party the worst. (Although the fact is, after Clinton, we may never get a chance to give this award, since it's obvious that Democrats are beyond normal shame or embarrassment.)

9 posted on 09/25/2002 7:14:01 AM PDT by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
IS ALGORE PSYCHOTIC? Did he do too many Thai-Stix???

"Psychiatrists have known for 150 years that heavy consumption of cannabis can produce hallucinations. This was thought to be rare and transient until the 1980s when, as cannabis consumption rose across Europe and the USA, it became apparent that people with chronic psychotic illnesses were more likely to be daily consumers of cannabis. " --

No smoke without fear Is there really a link between cannabis and psychosis? --

The Guardian (UK) ^ | September 17, 2002 | Robin Murray

http://freerepublic.com/perl/redirect?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guardian.co.uk%2Fhealth%2Fstory%2F0%2C3605%2C793421%2C00.html
12 posted on 09/25/2002 7:23:47 AM PDT by hang 'em
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
Kudos to Kelly and the 'Seattle Times' for a beautifully, brute and astute analysis of Algore.

Well worth sharing this one. . .

13 posted on 09/25/2002 7:26:53 AM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
"I also support the President's stated goals in the next phases of the war against terrorism as he laid them out in the State of the Union. ... Even if we give first priority to the destruction of terrorist networks, and even if we succeed, there are still governments that could bring us great harm. And there is a clear case that one of these governments in particular represents a virulent threat in a class by itself: Iraq. As far as I am concerned, a final reckoning with that government should be on the table."

-Al Gore, in Feb. 12, 2002 speech to Council on Foreign Relations.

Source

Full Transcript of Feb 12, 2002 speech

On May 23,2000 vice president and presidential candidate Al Gore made the following remarks about Iraq:

"We have made it clear that it is our policy to see Saddam Hussein gone. We have sought coalitions of opponents to challenge his power from within or without. I have met with the Iraqi resistance, and I have invited them to meet with me again next month – when I will encourage them to further unite in their efforts against Saddam. We have maintained sanctions in the face of rising criticism, while improving the oil-to-food program to help the Iraqi people directly. We have used force when necessary. And we will not let up in our efforts to free Iraq from Saddam's rule. Should he think of challenging us, I would strongly advise against it. As a Senator, I voted for the use of force. As Vice President, I supported the use of force. And if entrusted with the Presidency, my resolve will never waver. "

Source

15 posted on 09/25/2002 7:30:55 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
"Seattle Times calls Al Gore for what he is"

Kelly is a syndicated columnist, not a member of the Times editorial board. Nonetheless, it is a strong piece. To say the least!
19 posted on 09/25/2002 7:42:25 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed

“HEY, WATCH WHO YOU’RE CALLIN’ A WHORE!”

For those who were paying attention back in 1993, an event occurred which should have alerted us that this Gore fellow is either not terribly bright or has major short-term memory problems. While his college transcripts (and flunking out of divinity school) make that case far better than I could here, that event demonstrated – at least to me – something far more troubling in this guy’s intellectual chemistry.

In January of 1993, Clinton and Gore – apparently to cement their bone fides as “men of da peeple,” organized a bus tour prior to their triumphant entry into Washington for their inauguration on January 20th. Their final stop before heading up to DC was at Monticello, Jefferson’s home atop that beautiful mountain in Charlottesville, Virginia. Mr. Jefferson’s final resting place is also there just down the slope from that grand house.

During the visit – which was covered live by C-SPAN and watched with interest as it unfolded by this humble writer – Gore was conducted on a tour of the home by the one of the Park Service guides. At one point, Gore was shown a group of portraits identified by the guide as Washington, Franklin and Madison. (For what it’s worth, your humble writer – possibly because I went through the government school system BEFORE the PC crowd and the NEA took it over -- recognized these Founding Fathers BEFORE the guide spoke.)

These portraits hang on a relatively short wall flanked on either side by a doorway. Gore spent a few moments contemplating the images of three of the leading Founding Fathers of the nation he and his new pal, Bill Clinton, would soon lead. Gore and the guide then strolled through the door to their right and – though off camera – could be heard making comments as they apparently viewed the portraits on the other side of this same wall.

About a minute or so later, Gore and the guide came back into view through the LEFT door and back to the SAME wall upon which hung the portraits of Washington, Franklin and Madison. Gore looked at them and, motioning to them, asked the guide “AND WHO ARE THESE FELLOWS?” Who are THESE fellows??

I still recall my incredulity at the depth of the abysmal IGNORANCE of his question. No, strike that. Given that just a few minutes earlier Gore had seen these same portraits, the STUPIDITY of the question! There is no other term for it.

As I have reflected on that incredibly revealing incident during the years since, another frightening thought flooded in on me: This was a guy who, at the time of that Monticello visit in January of 1993, had served in public office at the national level for some 16 years and DID NOT RECOGNIZE THREE OF THE MEN WHO WERE INSTRUMENTAL IN CREATING THE VERY SYSTEM IN WHICH HE SERVED!

Anyone want to take a shot at how many times this guy had actually READ the Constitution he had by then sworn an oath to God to “…preserve, protect and defend it from all enemies, both foreign and domestic” MULTIPLE times? Who protects the Constitution from HIM? If you care enough to have read this far, you recognize THAT as a rhetorical question.

I thought I could hear a soft whirring sound in the background as Gore and Clinton used Monticello as a prop to further what was to become the most Constitution defying, scandal plagued administration in our history. I now believe it was Mr. Jefferson reaching speeds of 3,600 RPM in his grave down the hill.

A bit later in this same visit to Monticello, Bill and Al appeared on little stools on the porch. All that was missing were the little dunce caps. Assembled before them were a few hundred dutifully smiling and appreciative DC school kids trucked in as “props.”

During the clearly scripted Q & A by the kids, one of them asked Bill and Al why they wanted to go to Washington. I don’t recall exactly what Bill said (but I’m sure we all could come pretty close). I do, however, remember PRECISLY a portion of what Al said: “To make the world MORE BETTER…” for kids like them. “ MORE BETTER?”

And this guy was a journalist?

The Gore “Disinformation Squad” tells us that Dubya is not too bright?

Give me break!


21 posted on 09/25/2002 8:05:01 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed; belmont_mark
Well, perhaps Gore was just talking loosely. No. He made clear in the next sentence this was a considered indictment: "The vast majority of those who sponsored, planned and implemented the cold-blooded murder of more than 3,000 Americans are still at large, still neither located nor apprehended, much less punished and neutralized."

Maybe Gore knows something we do "not" know!!!

23 posted on 09/25/2002 8:08:50 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
"I have not raised those doubts, but many have."

Gutless faggot.

27 posted on 09/25/2002 8:16:20 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
My first thoughts after reading the speech was "WHY DIDN'T HITLERY GIVE THIS SPEECH?"

The above editorial answers that question nicely, but if we get lucky she'll give the next one and it'll be worse!! :-)
28 posted on 09/25/2002 8:24:25 AM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
The vast majority of those who sponsored, planned and implemented

As others have pointed out, this is a lie. The whole point of the operation was surprise, the implementers are dead, the planners were few to keep the operation undetectable, and many of the sponsors have been dealt with financially and diplomatically.

I oppose attacking Iraq but I must say Gore makes me lean the other way. Specifically I despise the notion that we should care what the international community thinks. If it is in U.S. interests to attack Iraq then we should attack, period.

31 posted on 09/25/2002 8:48:22 AM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
"...the Gore style -- equal parts mendacity, viciousness and smarm..."

That really sums it up.
33 posted on 09/25/2002 9:00:36 AM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
I thought you were talking about Daschle.
35 posted on 09/25/2002 9:07:45 AM PDT by solo gringo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
It was breathtakingly hypocritical, a naked political assault delivered in smarmy tones of moral condescension from a man pretending to be superior to mere politics. It was wretched. It was vile. It was contemptible. But I understate.

Wow, for a moment there,I thought Michael Kelly was referring to the Character Traits of One "Shrillary Rotten Clinton".(As a matter of fact,he subconsciously was doing just that.)

36 posted on 09/25/2002 9:35:26 AM PDT by Pagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
Can't wait to read Kelly's article about little Tommy's temper tantrum today.
39 posted on 09/25/2002 11:48:12 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: too-taxed
Right on. Gore is a moral slug.
42 posted on 09/25/2002 2:36:48 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson