Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/24/2002 9:07:35 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Howlin; Miss Marple; terilyn; JohnHuang2; Sabertooth; MeeknMing; summer
Ping
2 posted on 09/24/2002 9:10:06 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Al Gore...son of a Russian spy...enough said.
3 posted on 09/24/2002 9:21:18 PM PDT by spyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Al Gore turns out to be one of those really creepy sort of politicians, the kind that want high office so they can be somebody, as opposed to someone who has a vision or idea of what they would like to do.

We know this because while Gore pursues high office, his positions about what to do seem to vary with the wind.

How can anyone reconcile what Gore said yesterday with this, which is the same Gore, but in a different election cycle. The problem with electing a man like that to any office is that one can never be certain which Gore would show up on any given day.

For a guy who claims to have invented the Internet, Gore is surprisingly blind to the ways in which this technology changes politics. Clinton is probably the last of his species, the media-powered liar who could tell the public X today and Y tomorrow, and except for a few opposition newspaper columnists off in the corner screaming about it, never get called on it.

Gore's comments to the BBC in June of 2000 have not vanished into the ether, and no one has to run down to the library and fiddle with microfilm spools to find out what he said. Like every other fact in the Universe, Gore's previous positions are now one click away from any other fact about him.

Gore cannot play politics the way Clinton did. He cannot be "committed to the overthrow of President Saddam Hussein" in one election, and totally opposed in the next. Not if he wants to be taken seriously. If he tries, as he has done here, he will be exposed as an opportunistic liar. Since no one can tell whether he was lying then or is lying now, no one should -- or will -- trust him to hold either position. He'll say anything that he thinks will give him an advantage right now. He watched Clinton do this successfully through most of the Clinton presidency. But even for Clinton, by 1998 or so the Internet was already making an impact on Clinton's ability to tell the Big Lies.

Gore seems to have totally missed what this means. The era of the media-powered blow-dried empty suit is pretty much over in politics. People with basic principles, whether on the left or the right, are reasonably safe in this new environment, but the guy whose act was always to say 'the right thing for right now' -- figuring no one will remember what he said yesterday -- is in a world of hurt.

The technology of politics has passed Albert Gore Junior by, and he doesn't seem to have noticed. He's still out there telling us what he thinks we want to hear, but now it's too easy to see that's all he ever does. He doesn't mean anything by what he says, he's just making noises with his mouth, hoping to tap into the public passions of the moment. He stands for nothing, except wanting to be the Chief that people Hail to.

His is not a type that ever should have been elected to high office. He's a little man, with little ambitions and little thoughts, mostly about himself. Good riddance to him, and to his type.


5 posted on 09/24/2002 11:08:35 PM PDT by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Algore identifies himself with the Blame America First crowd. Why, the Bezerkely Taliban must have been grinning from ear to ear and lustily applauding the Pencil Eraserbrain's attack on America.
8 posted on 09/24/2002 11:17:23 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Go to NewsMax and read the story about how Algore placed politics about the people when he voted for the Gulf War in 1991.
9 posted on 09/24/2002 11:22:04 PM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Worth repeating....
GORE: Saddam Must Go
Source: BBC; Published: June 28, 2000; Author: Jeff Phillips
”US Vice-President Al Gore has told Iraqi opposition politicians that the United States remains committed to the overthrow of President Saddam Hussein.

Meeting a delegation from the Iraqi National Congress (INC), he also reiterated the administration's view that the Iraqi leader should be tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity………………………..”.

“……….”There can be no peace for the Middle East so long as Saddam is in a position to brutalise his people and threaten his neighbours”AL GORE….


30 posted on 09/25/2002 11:23:21 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
"In the immediate aftermath of September 11th," Mr. Gore said, "we had an enormous reservoir of good will and sympathy and shared resolve all over the world. That has been squandered in a year's time and replaced with great anxiety all around the world, not primarily about what the terrorist networks are going to do, but about what we're going to do."

This statement is just outrageous, and very much like the one he made about Bush 'squandering" the good economy in just a short time. Gore seems to forget that he was one of the ones screaming the loudest during the campaign when Bush said the economy was tanking!!!!!! But Clinton/Gore were still in charge then weren't they?

Anyone who voted for this arrogant unAmerican fool should be even more ashamed of themselves after this speech.

36 posted on 09/25/2002 9:47:10 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson