Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heston puzzles GOP, backs Siegelman
Mobile Register ^ | 09/22/2002 | BRENDAN KIRBY

Posted on 09/24/2002 4:52:46 PM PDT by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Southack
IMHO it's smart politics for the NRA and gun rights.

Reward your friends, even 'rats.

21 posted on 09/24/2002 7:00:57 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
El Gato, I won't argue with you about your response--it's true! However, Seigelmann is another Clinton wannabe. He supports, if you read the article, hunting rights, not gun owner rights. He is a tax and spend corrupt demoncrat.
22 posted on 09/24/2002 8:15:53 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
What exactly are you confused about?

Wellllll, since nothing has been stated in your own words, I can only assume you are implying that Charleton Heston has been symbolically banned for reasons known only by yourself since you have failed to offer your own ideas on this subject. Isn't click and paste great?

If that is truly the case, then what high-profile celebrity have you enlisted to replace Mr. Heston in supporting your 2nd Amendment rights? I am awaiting your intelligent response but please, please, don't forward me to someone else's comments.........I would rather hear your own words.

23 posted on 09/25/2002 5:01:59 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: zcat
A rather amazing performance. You either have missed a two-day purge-a-thon or are willing to pretend. Yes, hyperlinks (not pasting) are nice. They allow one to tell a story by linking not only this, but also (if someone really needed it spelled out),

this, (So long, Darth Sidious!)
this, (So long, gunshy!)
this,
this,
this,
this,
this,
this,
this,
and this.

Which I'm sure is needed since somehow you've missed quite a bit of what's been going on around you the last two days.

24 posted on 09/25/2002 6:02:26 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: zcat
I am awaiting your intelligent response but please, please, don't forward me to someone else's comments.........I would rather hear your own words.

Note that more than a few of the preceding are me, in my own words. But let me humor you.

1) The bannings are insanity with an activist flair. Not good for FR, not good for the Republicans, not good for anybody opposed to the Democrats.

2) TLBSHOW needs to put a sock in it. I'm rock-ribbed Republican--never voted for a Demo in my life--but I'm embarrassed to have him on my side. He's running around biting anyone not toeing the line, denouncing anyone in sight as a Democrat or a lib and behaving like a Stalin sycophant from the 40's Soviet Union.

3) You don't win elections by purifying down to some sliver of a core group. You have to reach out and recruit other people, other groups to help you defeat the common enemy.

4) FR can only lose steam and authority by becoming an organized cheering section and water boy for one party, right or wrong. Even my party. It was once an exciting place to be. (OK, we had Clinton to kick around for much of that.) Time heals, and the damage done in this bizarre push will take plenty of that.

25 posted on 09/25/2002 6:43:13 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
If that is truly the case, then what high-profile celebrity have you enlisted to replace Mr. Heston in supporting your 2nd Amendment rights?

Thank you for your response but still waiting for an answer to my above question......

26 posted on 09/26/2002 4:40:53 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: zcat
Yer belaborin' under a misprehaprehension.

-- Jimmy Durante

27 posted on 09/26/2002 4:47:30 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
But let me humor you.

Guess I missed it but thank you for trying. Now perhaps you could answer my question...

28 posted on 09/26/2002 4:49:44 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: zcat
I have done all that I know how to give you a clue. Where did I lose you? What do you understand about what's going on?
29 posted on 09/26/2002 4:53:39 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
If that is truly the case, then what high-profile celebrity have you enlisted to replace Mr. Heston in supporting your 2nd Amendment rights?<

Thank you for your response but still waiting for an answer to my above question......

Yer belaborin' under a misprehaprehension.-- Jimmy Durante

Not quite the answer I was expecting but since that is the best you can do then I have to accept it. I was hoping for a legitimate answer to a legitimate question but all you could provide was a smartass remark which pretty much explains where you are coming from.

Good night Mrs. Callabash..............

30 posted on 09/26/2002 4:59:31 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Southack; Lazamataz
Down here, most of the Democrats are far more conservative than yankee Republicans. E. Dole, for instance, is considered a Liberal around here. Some are actually Republicans that switched parties in order to run against imcumbents.

Locally, we've had Democratic candidates make shooting match challenges, boast of carrying pistols, and attend high-profile Baptist churches. (Yes, Chuck Baldwin actually has a church here.)

Except for a wacky few who celebrate First Monday at the local university, 2A rights here in the Florida panhandle are as uncontested as they can possibly be except for New Hampshire.

31 posted on 09/26/2002 4:59:37 PM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
It's Vermont. Vermont requires no CCW to legally pack heat. You mean Vermont, not New Hampshire.
32 posted on 09/26/2002 5:03:50 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Reward your friends, even 'rats.

Watch your step, mister, or you will be banned!

33 posted on 09/26/2002 5:04:03 PM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Thanks.

Hold muh beer whilst I make the changes...

34 posted on 09/26/2002 5:05:07 PM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: zcat
I was hoping for a legitimate answer to a legitimate question . . .

What about #25 didn't you get? Heston (AFAIK) has never actually Freeped. Otherwise, he would be bannable under the current rah-rah emphasis.

35 posted on 09/26/2002 5:05:40 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Southack
You Yanks are tough to figure out. Why the affinity for Democrats? It's not like the Democrats have come to the table with a single big idea since Hillary's 1993 Healthcare nationalization fiasco.

The only difference between the North and South is our cities are bigger and that turns the whole state Dem. Take a look at the county by county map of the 2000 election. If your cities grow in population, your states will get more liberal.

36 posted on 09/26/2002 5:05:44 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Down here, most of the Democrats are far more conservative than yankee Republicans. E. Dole, for instance, is considered a Liberal around here. Some are actually Republicans that switched parties in order to run against imcumbents.

Bull, some of the biggest libs in Congress are from the south.

37 posted on 09/26/2002 5:08:43 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan; RJayneJ; Dog Gone; Nick Danger; Lazamataz; Howlin; JohnHuang2
"The only difference between the North and South is our cities are bigger and that turns the whole state Dem. Take a look at the county by county map of the 2000 election. If your cities grow in population, your states will get more liberal."

That's a very good point, worthy of Quote of the Day material.

No wonder the Democrats are fighting like mad to reign in "urban sprawl". Those leaving the established mega-cities must be draining the Dems' power...

38 posted on 09/26/2002 5:12:55 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Whoops! Actually, I am just hoping to tempt some "good" 'rats over to our side.
39 posted on 09/26/2002 5:29:25 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Southack; #3Fan
If your cities grow in population, your states will get more liberal.

I don't agree. The inner city always becomes more liberal, but the suburbs often are Republican strongholds.

Take Houston, for example. It's the fourth largest city in the country. The city limits are a Democrat stronghold, but the greater urban area is conservative.

Look at the map of the 2000 election you referred to. Even the city of Houston wasn't enough to make Harris County into Gore country.

40 posted on 09/26/2002 5:35:14 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson