Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dirty in Iowa: Harkin campaign admits leaking transcript issues apology(RAT dirty tricks)
QCityTimes ^ | Todd Dorman

Posted on 09/24/2002 11:00:19 AM PDT by Dog

Harkin staff issues apology to Ganske campaign

By Todd Dorman

. DES MOINES — U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin’s campaign manager apologized Monday after acknowledging that his staff released the transcript of a closed-door Ganske for Senate campaign meeting, while Republicans called for a criminal probe to find out who taped the private proceedings.

. Citizens for Harkin Campaign Manager Jeff Link said no one associated with the campaign attended the Sept. 3 meeting at the Hotel Savery in Des Moines, where Ganske promised an aggressive campaign against Harkin.

.

Link said the Harkin campaign later obtained a transcript of the remarks which Harkin’s “press operation’’ then passed on to Lee Enterprises Des Moines Bureau Chief Kathie Obradovich. Obradovich wrote about the transcript in a column that appeared in Monday’s Quad-City Times, saying it had been provided to her by Democratic sources.

. U.S. Rep. Greg Ganske is running to unseat Harkin, a Democrat, in the November election.

. “Senator Harkin has indicated in the strongest possible terms that this was clearly unacceptable,’’ Link said in a statement. “As campaign manager, I take full responsibility for it, and on behalf of the campaign, I apologize to Congressman Ganske and his campaign.’’

. In a statement released at 9 p.m. Monday, the Ganske campaign called on Harkin's staff to disclose what they know about how the recording was made and pledged to “continue to pursue...legal remedies against the Harkin campaign and its agents.”

. “A partial apology from one member of a conspiracy is not enough,” Ganske spokesman Ann Warren said in the statement.

. While visiting Eisenhower School in Davenport Monday morning, Harkin denied his campaign taped the meeting, or that he had authorized it. “We had no campaign staff there,” he said.

. Link did not say how the Harkin campaign obtained the transcript or who taped the Ganske meeting. Earlier on Monday, Iowa Republican leaders asked state and federal law enforcement agencies to investigate, charging that the meeting was covertly recorded either through the use of a bugging device or by someone in the room wearing a “wire.’’

. “Clearly, a very serious breach of privacy has occurred,’’ said Chuck Larson Jr., chair of the Republican Party of Iowa, at a Statehouse media briefing. Larson wrote letters to the U.S. Attorney’s office in Des Moines and to the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation seeking a criminal inquiry. “Without doubt, someone was either wearing a wire in the room or the room had been bugged.’’

. But Republicans declined to directly accuse the Harkin campaign of wrongdoing.

. “I don’t think it would be appropriate at this time to speculate,’’ Larson said. But he called on Democrats to disavow such tactics and assist any inquiry.

. Iowa Democratic Party Vice Chairman Rob Tully dismissed what he viewed as mudslinging and said, “Any assertion of illegal activity here is completely ludicrous.’’

. According to Iowa law, it is not illegal to tape communications if the person “is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent” to the interception.

. The law also states that taping under those circumstances is not illegal unless it was done “for the purpose of committing a criminal or tortious act” in violation of the Constitution or U.S. laws or “for the purpose of committing any other injurious act.”

. A separate section of state law provides that anyone who is “openly present and participating in or listening to a communication” is not prohibited from recording the message or communication.

. Republicans contended planting of a listening device would clearly violate state and federal laws. But they also argue whoever secretly taped the meeting intended to injure Ganske’s election chances, and therefore, broke the law.

. And GOP leaders contended that penalties would extend to anyone who distributed the tape or transcript if they knew it was obtained illegally.

. “What happened here cries out to be investigated,’’ said Alan Ostergren, a former federal prosecutor and current assistant Muscatine County attorney who appeared at Monday’s briefing with Larson.

. Al Overbaugh, spokesman for U.S. Attorney Steve Colloton, said Larson’s request is being “reviewed.’’ Sgt. Robert Hansen, spokesman for the Iowa Department of Public Safety, said state investigators are evaluating the case.

. The transcript was taken from a Sept. 3 campaign meeting that Ganske’s campaign manager Bill Armistead said included about two-dozen supporters. They met in the Eleanor Roosevelt Room of the Savery Hotel along with campaign staff. White House political affairs director Ken Mehlman also joined the meeting by phone. The Ganske campaign did not tape the meeting, Armistead said, so it could not verify every detail of the 12-page transcript.

. “Greg Ganske, we think, makes a lot more sense for the people of Iowa than Senator Harkin does,’’ Mehlman said according to the transcript as he briefed the supporters on how the Ganske-Harkin race is “incredibly important’’ in the overall effort by Republicans to retake the Senate.

. Ganske then answered several questions from the group about his campaign’s status and strategy. The transcript highlights a quote attributed to Ganske saying, “You’ve never seen a campaign where anyone will attack (Harkin) like we’re going to. With a smile on our face. Not angry, not growling or scowling, just being so happy that we are just going to whip back the stress from our shoulders.’’ A fund-raising pitch followed.

. Armistead said the Ganske campaign has not yet contacted all the meeting participants. He said those who have been contacted deny taping the proceedings. A request for a complete list of attendees was not granted Monday.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: dirtytricks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Dog
Rat-gate? or Iowa-gate?

Sen. Harkin should resign, now. (I'm turning blue waiting for that to happen. :)
61 posted on 09/24/2002 3:00:31 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
"“A partial apology from one member of a conspiracy is not enough,” Ganske spokesman Ann Warren said in the statement."

Looks like it is democrat politics as usual. If this happened in a Republican campaign the press would be all over the candidate, not the campaign manager, about whether or not the staffer would be dismissed.

62 posted on 09/24/2002 3:10:19 PM PDT by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Didn't President Nixon have to RESIGN because of illegal campaign behavior?

I think it was obstruction of justice that got Nixon. Remember, the one Clinton got away with.

63 posted on 09/24/2002 3:32:23 PM PDT by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Nothing new here. Move along now. Back to your Watergate hotel rooms ....

heh heh !

64 posted on 09/24/2002 3:34:12 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dog
— U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin’s campaign manager apologized Monday after acknowledging that his staff released the transcript of a closed-door Ganske for Senate campaign meeting, while Republicans called for a criminal probe to find out who taped the private proceedings.

Wonder if Linda Tripp has heard this one. The Democrats weren't very nice to her, were they?

65 posted on 09/24/2002 3:42:01 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Thanks for the ping. :)
66 posted on 09/24/2002 3:42:24 PM PDT by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher
Ping!
67 posted on 09/24/2002 3:53:45 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
"Didn't President Nixon have to RESIGN because of illegal campaign behavior? "

Nixon did NOT have to resign at all. He choose to rather than put the country through any further process that might have lead to impeachement, though even that is prospect is in doubt.

The charge likely would have been obstruction of justice by not disclosing the White House taping system, and all they did reveal. Once that info was disclosed, he was more or less done (as far at the press was concerned).

68 posted on 09/24/2002 4:37:12 PM PDT by drc43
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Iowans should print this article and leave copies on bulletin boards, windshields, and storefronts.
69 posted on 09/24/2002 5:16:08 PM PDT by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
This reminded me of McDermott too.

Until this Harkin operative discloses who gave him the tape, his apology is meaningless. I hope republicans are game to take em to the mat on this....rub Harkin's nose in it. Lordy how I've hated that guy ever since impeachment. No personal honor, no integrity...if Bill Clinton had boinked a buffalo in the Rose Garden, Harkin would have applauded.

70 posted on 09/24/2002 6:32:07 PM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
This will make Rush interesting tomorrow. As has already been astutely observed, Harkin is a pile of...

Oh how I hope this costs him the election.

71 posted on 09/24/2002 6:55:21 PM PDT by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner
That would be so neat to have this cost Harkin! I would love to pick up that seat for Republicans! Cannot stand Harkin when he talks!
72 posted on 09/24/2002 7:21:43 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Maximum Leader
Wrongo, ML. It is NOT legal in Iowa to tape with either tortious or injurious consequence -- do note that not even 'intent' to tort or injury is needed for this to be a CRIME! ...

The law also states that taping under those circumstances is not illegal unless it was done “for the purpose of committing a criminal or tortious act” in violation of the Constitution or U.S. laws or “for the purpose of committing any other injurious act.”

73 posted on 09/24/2002 7:29:28 PM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
My Dear & Steadfast Freeper, PBK Mom ...

Harkin is AWFUL. Here's hoping Ganske gets after 'Sandanista Tommy' who prefers a domicile near Fidel rather than actually in plain vanilla Iowa.

Tommy, it is not well enough known, often hugged Daniel Ortega. So, how about a non-Ganske funded RNCC ad with the two commies in their fatigue shirts -- WOW. Ditto, an advert filmed outside 'Sandanista Tommy's' Caribbean domicile juxtaposed against his Iowa post box. DOUBLE WOW!!

Ganske & the RNCC need to take off the gloves and strop this wiper-up of Clintonoid sink spume.

74 posted on 09/24/2002 7:35:55 PM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Bump!
75 posted on 09/24/2002 8:27:47 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Support Greg Ganske for Senate. Send a credit card contribution or mail a check.

Link to www.ganskeforsenate.org

(Credit card donations are made via Pay Pal)

Ganske for Senate
1200 Grand Ave.
West Des Moines, IA 50265

76 posted on 09/24/2002 8:35:34 PM PDT by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner
This will make Rush interesting tomorrow.

Rush had it on his show today. Unless there are new developements, it's unlikely to make the show 2 days in a row.

77 posted on 09/24/2002 8:40:36 PM PDT by Iowa Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: dodger
You're absolutely right, thats what the law says, but according to the article posted here (and I admit I'm too lazy to dig out the Iowa criminal code and get a definitive answer), the law carves out a specific exception for people who are participating or attending the meeting.

So even if a person taped attended the meeting with criminal intent (he plans to, lets say, kidnap the candidate after the meeting), he couldn't be charged under this wiretaping law if he was openly attending the meeting.

I admit tha that may not be what the Iowa code actually says, but its what this article says the law is.
78 posted on 09/24/2002 9:03:51 PM PDT by Maximum Leader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
Do you know anyone working in Ganske's campaign? I'm looking for a contact who can help distribute some bumperstickers in the state to energize the Republicans to vote in November.

I can send a bunch of bumperstickers that look like this:


79 posted on 09/24/2002 10:55:14 PM PDT by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Have I got this right? Someone taped a political meeting at which the most quotable thing said by the candidate or anyone was that Ganske was better for Iowa than Harkin and that they would attack Harkin while smiling? (Had to get to the 20th paragraph to find what it was all about.) The Harkin campaign then leaked the "explosive" transcript and some news bimbo actually wrote a story about it? (Got that in paragraph 3).

So, Harkin got nothing out of going public with a transcript which only proved that his campaign was up to dirty tricks. Curious.

Sounds like Harkin is an idiot and running a lousy campaign. Good.
80 posted on 09/25/2002 1:37:02 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson