This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 09/24/2002 5:54:29 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
locked |
Posted on 09/23/2002 11:53:29 AM PDT by TheBigB
It seems as though several folks are interested in a suggestion I made on an earlier thread, regarding the fact that several second and third-tier "celebrities" have placed an ad in the NYT titled NOT IN OUR NAME. This ad castigates the Bush administration for the stance on Iraq, the WoT, and other things. I suggested we place an ad of our own. Here is my original post:
"How much would it cost...if we all chipped in...to buy one ad. With our names. And have it say up top, "YES...IN OUR NAME". We are not celebrities, nor entertainers, nor self-avowed "intellectuals"...we are Americans. Self-described Average Americans, who work day-to-day, salute our flag, pay our taxes and recognoze that America, as far from perfect as she may be, has always been Earth's shining light. That we, as a nation, have always been there, to defend freedom, to help feed the hungry, and yes, to protect the powerless. We've proven it, time and time again. Now the time has come for us to find out who are allies truly are. We are not the opinion-shapers, but we are the nation-makers. Yes Mr. President, do it...IN OUR NAME."
Who would be interested in this? Houmatt checked on some prices from USA TODAY...he says "For a full page color ad, it is $110,300. For B&W, $71,000. But you do get discounts if the organization is non-profit, 501 (c) 3 and/or you deal with the newspaper directly, not through a third party." Now get that price...at least $71K. I thnk to get enough donations, we'd need so many people to donate that we'd need a full-page ad for the names. I certainly couldn't afford to give too much myself. I'd love to do this, just to show the country that these half-baked "entertainers" aren't the only ones with strong opinions. But I ask...is it feasable? Could we raise enough? I just want opinions for now. What do y'all think, seriously?
Explain this to me - it had the whole post from the top??
I'm in. Gotta fight the liberal elite!!!
2 posted on 9/23/02 11:54 AM Pacific by rintense
[ To 1 | View Replies ]
To: TheBigB
$71k is probably out of the question. Not unless you find a sugar daddy
3 posted on 9/23/02 11:55 AM Pacific by AppyPappy
[ To 1 | View Replies ]
To: 1bigdictator; zlala; fight_truth_decay; hgro; Two-Bits; Houmatt; Delphinium; Revelation 911; ...
bump
4 posted on 9/23/02 11:56 AM Pacific by TheBigB
[ To 1 | View Replies ]
To: TheBigB
I'm in. Can't afford much, but I'll give what I can.
5 posted on 9/23/02 11:57 AM Pacific by MTRatt
[ To 1 | View Replies ]
When Jane Fonda and Ed Asner look up from the bottom of the trash, it's a pleasure to give them coffee grounds and egg shells.
The New York Times is the product of the hate-America fairies--why give them revenue?
It's looked up to by cockroaches, and down on by FReepers such as yours truly.
Not a cent for the Gray Drag Queen, the Toilet Paper of Record, All Is Skewed To Fit Our Bent.
Let's roll over the clymers--we're the 68%--and rising.
Either your cookie did not work or they locked the thread and then re-instated it. I dunno?
Also, my notifier is coming up 'full screen', instead of a little box!! I think my computer has a ghost!! LOL
If anyone can explain it, please do, I need to log off for tonight.
Keep me informed.
Semper Fi
Ping me or keep me involved.
USMC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.