Posted on 09/23/2002 6:55:59 AM PDT by SJackson
The discussion on the possibility of changing the Wests distorted image of Islam, taking place in both Islamic and international contexts, has reached an unprecedented level. The tragic events of Sept. 11 and the dangerous insinuations that followed have created deep feelings of despair among Muslims as well as non-Muslims.
Though change may be difficult, we should, nevertheless, refuse to give up; nor should we give in to the many Islamic and Western extremists who believe that Islam and the West can never see eye to eye and who seek to widen the cultural, political and economic divides separating Islam from the West. These extremists are taking advantage of the anti-Islamic campaigns in the Western media and even in some important Western policy-making circles.
These campaigns have exceeded all reason. They have brought us all together to cry loudly: Things have gone too far. We must not forget though that this propensity to distort the image of Islam and Muslims is not new. It is, instead, the revival of a tendency whose roots go back more than ten centuries. Politicians and thinkers from those times regarded Islam as a threat to the West. This same tendency is evident today in works by Zingenio Bergensky, Crescent of Ages, Bernard Lewis in The Resurgence of Islam, Francis Fukuyama in The End of History and finally in Samuel Huntingtons Clash of Civilizations.
We are faced today with an enmity of unlimited organization and influence, what one British researcher calls the phenomenon of anti-Islamism. He believes that this phenomenon has been widening, not merely in the West but throughout the world, as a result of a number of factors. With the end of the Cold War, the idea that Islam, not communism, is the enemy of the West gained acceptability in many circles. Another factor is the rise of an extremist right wing in both Europe and the United States. Far too much anti-Islamic writing and sentiment is being spread in the name of such principles as openness, democracy, freedom of expression and the benefits of globalism.
We must resist all of this. We are a nation with a universal message that must be conveyed to the world. If the image of Islam and its culture remains unchanged, it will keep people from understanding its culture and living peacefully with its followers. It is not within our power, even if we so wished, to live isolated from the world. Our interests have become intertwined. Islam exists in the West and the West exists in Islam as a famous French social scientist has remarked. The flood of Western information and advertising has invaded our homes and now shapes much of our thinking. Islam is present in Western societies and is spreading with amazing speed, becoming significant in terms of demographic composition and politics.
The success of efforts to change Islams image in the West depends on two factors. The first Muslims themselves must be convinced of the need for real efforts to change it. Sept. 11 has reinforced the need for us to act and give the matter the attention and care that it deserves.
The second factor is to have an environment in the West, susceptible to such a change. Do we see any real indication in the West of this willingness? Has the question of change been brought up? Is there any sense in trying? And if so, what can we do? How can we act and is there still a chance for us? These are questions that we will attempt to answer next week.
Militant Indonesian Muslim protesters hold up a sign
reading "Total holy war (Jihad) for the enemy of Islam"
during an anti-America demonstration in Solo, central Java,
September 16, 2002. The small group of Muslim youths REUTERS/Stringer
You see thats why you must die nobody cared what you did in your wretched desert but try to bring it to us now you all gotta die.
He kinda did its just buried in the rest of the stuff.
#1 Never, never turn your back to them!
#2 Keep your finger on the trigger at all times!
Yeah. Act like the "Religion O' Peace" that you claim to be.
The author's problems begin in the first sentence. He makes the assumption, perhaps an invalid assumption, that Islam's problems begin with the West's perceptions. He never considers the possibility that this may not be a public image makers issue but rather an issue of reality. Islam may have more of a reality problem than a PR problem.
We must not forget though that this propensity to distort the image of Islam and Muslims is not new. It is, instead, the revival of a tendency whose roots go back more than ten centuries.
A conflict that goes back to the birth of Islam becomes the rallying cry for a PR campaign. Again, the failure to accept the possibility that there is any thing beyond a perception problem misses the point. Can wars on virtually every border between Muslim countries and non-Muslim countries be attributed to bad press? Can stoning and beheading people who fail to follow the incomprehensible idiocies of Sharia law be swept under the rug for an advertising campaign? It takes a lot of hard work to undo the favorable press that Islam has received in the United States but somehow this misunderstood religion has managed to do it.
The second factor is to have an environment in the West, susceptible to such a change
Despite the ability to freely enter this country as citizens, residents, workers, and students living here and enjoying the rights and freedoms that have been extended to them, he questions whether this nation has been able to view them in an unbiased fashion. It's only now after being repeatedly attacked both literally and figuratively that people are even becoming suspicious.
Islam had better wake up to the fact that it is not being descriminated against and accept responsibility for its own actions. That's the way we would want to handle our problems here and they need to come to terms with it. In this country many have become our guests. Not only could this end but so could their welcome elsewhere.
Yassir Arafat is the embodiment of all that is Islam.
He invented Airplane hijacking.
He pollutes the minds of the young.
He promotes the darkest in the human heart.
ARAFAT = ISLAM = HATE = EVIL
Who's fault is everything? The WEST! The JOOOOOOOSSSSSS! The Great SATAN! (that's us, USA, in case you missed it.)
Yeah, they've got credibility all right. </sarcasm>
How about a fatwah against Al-Qaeda and its supporters? Next thing, an invitation to Jewish and Christian groups to come to your community centers and tell you about Judaism and Christianity?
You just did that quite neatly, guttercrawlers. Now we have the right idea!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.