Replies

Nice article. Socialism is a disease and liberalism is a mental disorder. The leftists who inhabit damn near every American university campus really are nuts; they have never offered a single solution to the problems they perceive as the cause of human misery because it is they who are the perpetuators of misery, class warfare, racism, poverty, ignorance, and despair.

And they do it, not to end these human calamities, but for their own, personal aggrandizement. If they were ultimately successful, they would find themselves the first up against the wall, put there by the very minions of hate which they helped to gain power. They are the true enemies of freedom, the useful idiots who brought massive misery to the 20th century in the form of the Soviet Union, Adolph Hitler, the PRC, and others too numerous to name.

I no longer have any tolerance for them or their half-baked ideas whatsoever.

Nice reponse. My sentiments too. I would only add that there is a distinction between a liberal/socialist and a leftist. For example, Sarah Brady is a socialist (self described social engineer) who thinks that taking all guns away from citizens will make the USA a better place. (what a fool). A leftist knows this to be non-sense (more likely he does not care) but repeats the non-sense for the ultimate goal of dis-arming the nation and getting Sarah Brady, et al, to vote for him.

Hillary Clinton is not a socialist, she is a leftist. As many leftist have found, socialists and liberals are useful idiots that help in pursuit of the leftist's ultimate goal - power. Hillary Clinton pushed National Health Care at the pretense of "being for the greater good". What she was truly after was controlling 260 million people through dependence on government for health care (if they have you by the health care they have you by the short hair).

IMHO, the leadership of the Democratic party is over-run by leftists while the idiot liberals and idiot socialists drool over every utterence of these scoundrels. The path that these leftists take requires that they buy as many votes as possible to create as much dependence as possible. That is why they are constantly looking for more tax revenue while disregarding government corruption redundancy and inefficiency. It is not to help the poor and down trodden after all.

You have hit the nail on the head about the socialists and liberals. If they actually got all the things they wanted, they would then find themselves in a concentration camp as the first wave of "re-education" inmates. Of course, conservatives and libertarians would be among the second wave.