Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terrorist Alert color level raised to orange(High Risk)
CNN

Posted on 09/10/2002 8:51:21 AM PDT by newsperson999

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-154 next last
To: ksen
People are trying to figure out why the threatcon has been raised. They're worried. Save your gratuitous Bush bashing for a different thread. It has no place in this one and comes off as purile.
61 posted on 09/10/2002 9:34:15 AM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: newsperson999

Bush administration to raise terror alert level, officials say
JOHN SOLOMON, Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, September 10, 2002
©2002 Associated Press

URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/09/10/national1205EDT0589.DTL

(09-10) 09:33 PDT WASHINGTON (AP) --  On the eve of the Sept. 11 anniversary, the Bush administration decided Tuesday to raise the terror alert level for the first time to code orange, signaling a high danger of attack, a government official told The Associated Press.

The official, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said the decision would be announced at 1 p.m. EDT by Attorney General John AShcroft, FBI Director Robert Mueller and Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge.

A second government official, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, said the threat that prompted the increased alert involves specific and credible information about threats to American embassies overseas.

"As a result of new information we have received, the threat level is increasing from yellow to orange. It's a nationwide alert," said another official, also declining to be named publicly.

U.S. intelligence officials have been saying since the weekend that there has been an increased amount of chatter among al-Qaida sympathizers.

The FBI issued a warning that became public Monday asking operators of computer networks, utilities and transportation system to be wary during the anniversary this week of the suicide hijackings that leveled the World Trade Center and damaged the Pentagon.

An official said that while the threat pertains to embassies overseas, the administration has not ruled out that interests in America could be targeted. Thus, security at federal buildings throughout Washington were increased Tuesday.

U.S. embassies in Malaysia and Indonesia were closed because of specific threats about potential terrorist activities.

Since the administration created a five color coded threat system in March, the government had kept the warning at code yellow, signifying an elevated condition of alert and a significant risk of terrorist attacks.

The code orange set Tuesday is the second highest alert status, signaling a high risk for terrorist attacks.

Under the system set up by Ridge, government officials must:

* Coordinate necessary security efforts with armed forces or law enforcement agencies.

* Take additional precaution at public events.

* Prepare to work at an alternate site or with a dispersed work force.

* Restrict access to essential personnel only.

Vice President Dick Cheney spent Monday night at an undisclosed location outside Washington. Aides said there was no specific threat against Cheney, but the anniversary has produced a heightened buzz in the intelligence community and officials want to protect the continuity of government in case of an attack.

Cheney was working in the White House on Tuesday morning, but his upcoming schedule, including a speech Tuesday night and participation in Sept. 11 commemorations Wednesday, is under review, aides said.

The FBI told police, utilities, banks and the transportation industry to be wary. U.S. military bases and diplomatic missions worldwide also are on high security alert for the week.

And U.S. Navy officials in Bahrain issued a warning to shippers Tuesday following unconfirmed reports that al-Qaida may be planning attacks on oil tankers.

"While the U.S. Navy has no specific details on the timing or means of the planned attacks, and there are no indications than an attack is imminent, the threat should be regarded seriously," said an advisory from the Navy's Maritime Liaison Office in Bahrain.

It said shipmasters should exercise extreme caution when traveling through strategic choke points such as the Strait of Hormuz or Bab-el-Mandeb, or sailing in traditional high-threat areas such as along the Horn of Africa and other confined waters.

White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said the threat of new attacks has U.S. officials on a "higher sense of guard."

"As the anniversary approaches, our concerns increase and that's based on information that we've obtained. That's also based on historical facts about what anniversaries mean. ... Anniversaries can be occasions -- not always are but can be occasions -- for terrorists to attack again. We're cognizant of that, we're vigilant about that," Fleischer said.

The State Department issued a worldwide caution Monday night urging Americans to remain especially vigilant this week.


On The Net: NIPC: www.nipc.gov/publications/infobulletins/2002/ib02-007.htm
62 posted on 09/10/2002 9:36:35 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Dog,
I was thinking the same thing..they may just say that it is a threat to overseas people in order not to panic people at home.
63 posted on 09/10/2002 9:36:35 AM PDT by newsperson999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
CNN just back-peddling: they made a point of saying 'for the first time ever'. (But they didn't apologize)
64 posted on 09/10/2002 9:36:49 AM PDT by Stevieboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Snowy
We live within 20 miles or so of Limerick. My daughter has to go on a school trip tomorrow and I think that the way they go is very close to Limerick. Never thought of that. I really want my family close by tomorrow.
65 posted on 09/10/2002 9:36:53 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: abner
Please post some pics of tomorrow's event. Love the ones you have already posted.
66 posted on 09/10/2002 9:37:35 AM PDT by Between the Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: newsperson999
I think you're on the money. Why would you deploy SAM's around D.C. for an "exercise"???? When I was in the service, they never would deploy live-fire large weapons near a major U.S. city and as the brass used to say, it would only happen if TSHTF. We were always told they were afraid a newbie would blow a commercial plane out of the sky by accident...
67 posted on 09/10/2002 9:38:53 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Nuke'm Glowing
Why would you deploy SAM's around D.C. for an "exercise"????

What I don't get is why they say the weapons are un-armed: what's the point? Is that just designed to make people feel better?
68 posted on 09/10/2002 9:40:26 AM PDT by Stevieboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Nuke'm Glowing
they have many times given alerts for ONLY OVERseas americans without raising us up on the scale. i think they are covering their asses..don;t won't to panic people at home but at the same time if there is a terroist attack they will be covered
69 posted on 09/10/2002 9:41:42 AM PDT by newsperson999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Ah, I am not bashing President Bush. I was making an observation just like the guy I was responding to did. I hope you notified him of your concern as well.
70 posted on 09/10/2002 9:42:15 AM PDT by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Stevieboy
"...they say the weapons are un-armed..."

Yes, so they SAY. America and it's (few) allies aren't the only audience for this...
71 posted on 09/10/2002 9:43:24 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Stevieboy
There is a difference between .....un-armed and the missiles being located close by....

Get my drift..??

72 posted on 09/10/2002 9:44:01 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Stevieboy
I think it's

B ovine
S cattology

I never have known a SAM battery to be deployed with duds. Especially in this type of environment. It's probably just to make everyone feel good. And the types of weapons they are deploying, Avengers and Stingers are for low level intercepts. So that's why I'm wondering if they are excpecting some problems from a private plane instead of a commercial liner this time....
73 posted on 09/10/2002 9:44:12 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Stevieboy
"CNN just back-peddling: they made a point of saying 'for the first time ever'. (But they didn't apologize)"

'Course they won't apologize: they'll just act like the mistake never happened and wait for the viewing public to forget that Clinton News Network's reporting is untrustworthy.

74 posted on 09/10/2002 9:44:31 AM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: newsperson999
Yeah, this has all the sniffings of a General Quarters drill on an amphib ship at 2 in the morning because the radar operator misread a seagull as a fighter jet.
75 posted on 09/10/2002 9:45:27 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: andy_card
This may be a mistake.

Nope -- we used to think that way in South Florida, when we'd get warning after warning of hurricanes that never hit. Andrew changed that. The media will criticize, but most people know it makes perfect sense. We've gotten a bit too complacent, and need to be reminded that there's plenty of lone Islamist loonies in our midst, even if Al Quaida doesn't get their act together.

76 posted on 09/10/2002 9:46:15 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
Besides, the armed weapons could be quite close by, yes? Who can tell me how long it takes to arm these systems?

Here's another thought: Yes, when deployed the systems weren't armed for the exercise. Maybe they armed them after the exercise was completed, hmm?
77 posted on 09/10/2002 9:46:22 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Dog
There is a difference between .....un-armed and the missiles being located close by.... Get my drift..?? </>

You mean just like the untargetted Russian ICBMs?
78 posted on 09/10/2002 9:47:05 AM PDT by Stevieboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: shezza
(e) THREATCON DELTA. Implementation applies in the immediate area where a terrorist attack has occurred

isn't that kind of like locking the barn door after the horse has bolted? Although, I can see the possibility of terrorist attacks on rescuers, or leave-behind bombs, etc...

79 posted on 09/10/2002 9:47:09 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: All
http://www.whitehouse.gov/homeland/
80 posted on 09/10/2002 9:48:22 AM PDT by Quicksilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson