Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British peace activists to act as human shields for Baghdad
Daily Telegraph ^ | September 9, 2002 | Adam Lusher

Posted on 09/08/2002 6:01:46 AM PDT by zapiks44

British peace protesters plan to go to Baghdad to act as voluntary "human shields" during a war against Iraq.

The activists, who have received President Saddam Hussein's blessing for the mission, want to try to deter attacks by "showing solidarity" with the Iraqi people and witnessing "their suffering".

They are willing to risk their lives in the hope that their presence at installations such as power stations might deter American and British bombing raids.

The "Iraq peace team", from the group Voices in the Wilderness, intends to go to Iraq as early as this month alongside volunteers from the United States.

One of the British volunteers, Matt Barr, 21, a student from Chichester, West Sussex, said: "Obviously, it's unpleasant to consider that you could be killed, but it is important to extend the arm of solidarity and brotherhood to a nation that is suffering - to bear witness to what is happening to the ordinary people."

He added: "I believe in the sanctity of human life. I have dedicated the last five years of my life to human rights. If there is a major attack on Iraq it is the innocent civilians who are going to suffer. That is something I cannot stand by and let happen."

Voices in the Wilderness, founded in Britain in 1998, grew out of the peace protests during the Gulf war, when British activists camped in the desert on the Iraqi border.

The group's website admits that members are involved in breaking "criminal" international sanctions against Baghdad. It says they "risk persecution and imprisonment" in doing so.

The "peace team" idea has been welcomed by the Iraqi regime. Kathy Kelly, the US co-ordinator of Voices in the Wilderness, secured agreement for the mission from Tariq Aziz, the deputy prime minister, in Baghdad in May.

She said: "We will tell everybody that goes over that they should be prepared to say that they have had a good life and this could be the last year of their life."

Mudhafar Amin, the diplomat representing Iraq's interests in London, said: "They are real humanitarians and very brave."

Voices in the Wilderness hopes that its peace team will eventually number 100 members, paying their own costs and working in groups of about 10.

Among the buildings they intend to visit are power and sewage plants. Milan Rai, a group co-ordinator, said the team would all be "seasoned non-violent activists" able to cope under "extreme stress".

Mr Rai, 37, a writer from Hastings, East Sussex, said: "I think that if there are Westerners at a power station, the chances of it getting hit will be reduced."

He added: "I don't think the phrase 'human shield' is appropriate. It evokes the way that some people were put at risk involuntarily."

When Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, troops seized about 1,200 expatriate Britons. On Saddam's orders they were placed at key installations as "human shields". Their presence, Saddam reasoned, would deter allied air strikes.

The tactic prompted worldwide revulsion, especially when Saddam was filmed trying to create favourable propaganda by urging a five-year-old boy, Stuart Lockwood, from Worcester, to sit on his knee. The terrified boy refused.

Diplomatic efforts eventually led to the hostages' release, but many have suffered continuing psychological trauma. Two killed themselves.

Bernard Jenkin, the shadow defence secretary, criticised the planned peace mission. He said: "These people are what the communist Soviet Union used to refer to as useful idiots. They will simply be serving the propaganda interests of an evil dictator."


TOPICS: Announcements; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: baghdad; humanshields; iraq; peaceniks; saddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: zapiks44
It says they "risk persecution and imprisonment" in doing so.

They are not dealing with reality. What they risk is a JDAM up their keister.
41 posted on 09/08/2002 7:42:51 AM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Don't look now, but some of our loonies are missing.
42 posted on 09/08/2002 7:47:29 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus; zapiks44
You're both correct; useful to Saddam, useless to the rest of us.
43 posted on 09/08/2002 7:50:35 AM PDT by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
Kathy Kelly, the US co-ordinator of Voices in the Wilderness, secured agreement for the mission from Tariq Aziz, the deputy prime minister, in Baghdad in May.

Did she also agree to wear a burqua while dying for Saddam?

44 posted on 09/08/2002 7:53:39 AM PDT by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: Agent Smith; Angelus Errare
ROTFLMAO!

Anyway, as someone else pointed out, what they're doing does count as treason towards the UK. Likewise for any Americans who join them.

BTW: Thanks for the quote from the Constitution. Been using that phrase for a while. Nice to be reminded of where exactly it came from.
46 posted on 09/08/2002 8:05:37 AM PDT by Green Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
Fine... multiple birds with one stone. Whatever.
47 posted on 09/08/2002 8:06:45 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
The dead Muslim terrorists will each get 72 virgins; the dead British peace activists will have to share one retired hooker and 3 dead sheep.
48 posted on 09/08/2002 8:14:43 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abner
"I believe that any US or British citizen that would put themselves on Iraqi soil as a friend to Iraq during a war with the US & Britain is a TRAITOR!"

Does the name Jane Fonda ring a bell?


49 posted on 09/08/2002 8:46:37 AM PDT by sinclair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
They should wear radio beacons so we can know exactly where they are.
50 posted on 09/08/2002 8:56:17 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Agent Smith
CORRECTION

Useless idiots.


Definitely. What I found interesting though was the blatant hypocrisy and selective thinking:

He added: "I believe in the sanctity of human life. I have dedicated the last five years of my life to human rights. If there is a major attack on Iraq it is the innocent civilians who are going to suffer. That is something I cannot stand by and let happen."

So from that, I conclude that it is perfectly ok for Saddam to murder his own innocent civililians, but it is wrong of the U.S. to try and put a stop to that. There is nary a mention from this group about the sanctity of life for the people that history has clearly shown were murdered at the discretion of Saddam's bloody regime. Nor is there any logical thinking with that in mind that removing Saddam would save more lives in the long run.

That speaks volumes of what "sanctity of life" means to them.
51 posted on 09/08/2002 9:13:02 AM PDT by Thoro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
These idiots have only weeks or days of life left in them. While they may have been brain-washed in the UK...they will meet their untimely death in Iraq. It is a sad commentary of a great nation to produce people with such misguided intentions. May God have mercy upon their soul, as they die in a God-for-saken land. May their last seconds of life be quick and with limited pain. And then....may God give our American sons and daughters, the courage and the will to bring the great Saddam down. Let any idiot who thinks he is blessed to be a human shield for Iraq...stand and be counted....your days are so few, and enjoy what you have.
52 posted on 09/08/2002 9:24:46 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
Bernard Jenkin, the shadow defence secretary, criticised the planned peace mission. He said: "These people are what the communist Soviet Union used to refer to as useful idiots. They will simply be serving the propaganda interests of an evil dictator."

Bingo. (Ultra maroons!)

53 posted on 09/08/2002 9:28:24 AM PDT by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
Darwin Award time.
54 posted on 09/08/2002 9:31:32 AM PDT by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rube

That said...she is a real nutcase. She'd love to ban all guns, and would rather be conquered and enslaved than resist through any means other than passive resistance. When Sean asked her if she would fight off an intruder who intended to rape her daughter, she hemmed and hawed and finally admitted that she would not resist. She is consistent.

That was on Friday. A friend of mine was a half hour late to meet me because she was sitting in her car screaming at the radio. This Kelly person sent her right over the edge -- especially about the not saving her daughter part. (My friend has four children.)


55 posted on 09/08/2002 9:33:00 AM PDT by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
LOL

I remember the human shields who went to the west bank and soiled their panties when people actually started shooting at them

Human shields my elbow!

The will be out of there so fast...

56 posted on 09/08/2002 9:53:08 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
"Let us hope that this misguided self-righteous group will take Michael Green with them..."

Let's hope Michael Moore joins them

57 posted on 09/08/2002 11:10:29 AM PDT by doc11355
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
This is the best news I've seen in YEARS.

Let's hope our own fruitcakes decide to emulate them in a big way.

58 posted on 09/08/2002 11:10:43 AM PDT by Jonathon Spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Don't look now, but some of our loonies are missing.

Oh good, at least they won't be in the country causing trouble. Let them stay there.

Regards, Ivan

59 posted on 09/08/2002 11:11:52 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44


60 posted on 09/08/2002 1:22:56 PM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson