Skip to comments.
ATOMIC SCIENCE COMMISSION: IRAQ 6 MONTHS AWAY FROM HAVING NUCLEAR WEAPON!
FOX NEWS CHANNEL ^
Posted on 09/07/2002 1:22:23 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
FOX NEWS ALERT: IAEA (International Atomic Energy Association?) REPORTS TO PRESIDENT BUSH: IRAQ IS SIX MONTHS AWAY FROM HAVING A NUCLEAR WEAPON. Nothing else follows, details forthcoming.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; saddam; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-179 next last
To: glock rocks
Saddam is actively pursuing his nuclear weapons program.
Duct tape Scott Ritter and Joe Biden to a BLU-118 and have them get to the bottom of it.
Saddam is developing new delivery methods for chemical and biological weapons.
We've seen how a blind psycho paralyzed Tokyo's subway--imagine it done on a military scale.
Saddam has had contact with Al Qaeda before and after 9/11.
Atta met twice in Prague with a Saddam terrorist agent.
If Daschle is not convinced, fly him to Iraq a la "Fear Factor"--
Fit him with one of those helmets with the minicam aimed to get his facial expression--
Push him out of the plane and watch him undergo what so many experienced on 9/11:
No parachute. This is not a movie.
It's a Todd Beamer reality: Let's roll.
If it means rolling over fifth column clymers, get video.
To: glock rocks
Thanks for #40.
From Vienna, the head of the U.N. nuclear inspection team said Friday that satellite photographs shows
So the story breaks Friday, but the US media doesn't put it out until 5pm Saturday, when most people aren't watching news channels...
To: glock rocks
..."Arab League chief Amr Moussa charged Thursday that any strike by the U.S. would "open the gates of hell" in the Middle East, and urged Baghdad to re-admit weapons inspectors. "We will continue to work to avoid a military confrontation or a military action because we believe that it will open the gates of hell in the Middle East," he told reporters.
The gates of hell in the Middle East have never been shut! That part of the planet is a sh!t-hole.
63
posted on
09/07/2002 2:16:00 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
To: Peach
He'll say it so that they may publish it, and their people will know how much patience we are showing, and that we are not cowboys first...but when we are...stay home!
To: Teacher317
That's the right stuff!
65
posted on
09/07/2002 2:17:41 PM PDT
by
LibKill
To: Our man in washington
So why don't we just Hussein a nuclear weapon now and save him six months of trouble? Anyone seen Deterrence? It's not much better than a made-for-TV movie, but it has a very interesting surprise at the end.
Spoiler alert!: Iraq invades Kuwait again and the President threatens to nuke Baghdad. Iraq says they have 23 nuclear missiles spread around various places and will launch them. The President orders in the B-2, Iraq launches, Baghdad is vaporized but all of Iraq's missiles are duds.
It turns out that the US conspired with France to sell defective nukes to Iraq, along with computer technology that was rigged to make it appear the nukes were functional. The President knows this all along but doesn't tell anyone -- and they think he is a madman. At one point, a general refuses an order and is relieved of command.
An interesting twist: the President (Kevin Pollack) assumed the office after being elected Vice-President and is currently campaigning for (re?-)election. He is Jewish, which makes negotiating with Iraq an almost entertaining exercise in futility.
To: PhilDragoo
Today's must read for interested Freepers - search for: Iraq - Scotsman says Saddam has weapons to wipe out world's population. The info is based on 10 Downing Street's dossier on Saddam. The dossier is detailed further down (around post #7).
67
posted on
09/07/2002 2:18:28 PM PDT
by
Peach
To: Recovering_Democrat
I would take anything with the word "nuke" in it as propaganda. Similarly, anytime you hear dark mutterings about satellite pictures of buildings, you can pretty much assume it's just propaganda. It might be for a good cause but, it's bunk.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Amen and welcome to the fold! Rush pegged it yesterday defining Tom Dashle and his buds as wimps. They are pathetic at best. Thank God we've got a commander in chief in GW. This guy doesn't have to prove anything to anyone, but his leadership will shine in the months ahead as we fight the war. Mr. President, I am behind you, millions are behind you! Those who follow the course of events know what's at stake.
To: The Duke
I know you've always sounded pretty hawkish in your posts and was surprised at today's. If you get a chance - search for today's post from the Scotsman which details 10 Downing Street's dossier on Saddam, just released today and much discussed on CNN. If interested, search: Iraq - Scotsman says Saddam has weapons to wipe out world's population.
70
posted on
09/07/2002 2:21:05 PM PDT
by
Peach
To: Peach
And droberts won't explain his opposition either. Look at his posting history. Over the past month almost every single reply he has made to threads are hit-and-run, where he makes some snide comment about oil, or invading something, then leaves.
This guy is nothing but a troll.
To: freeasinbeer
I've experienced that hit and run mentality before and try to figure out who is who, but would need a pretty big gamecard. Thanks for the heads up.
72
posted on
09/07/2002 2:22:37 PM PDT
by
Peach
To: Peach
#13 I agree. Heard Rush as well, the RATS are nothing more than self-serving idiots. And don't forget, when the RATS are out of power and control, they get goofy. Let's add goofy as well. They're desparate, and know they've got their "plump rumps" in a snare.......And it will get tighter in November.
To: Peach
To: Peach
To: WyCoKsRepublican
And don't forget, when the RATS are out of power and control, they get goofy. You know, you're right. Rush always says when the Rats are out of power is when they are the most fun, although the current situation is too serious to term fun.
76
posted on
09/07/2002 2:24:10 PM PDT
by
Peach
To: justlurking
Thanks for the link. I've looked up how to do it but haven't had the courage to try yet.
77
posted on
09/07/2002 2:25:16 PM PDT
by
Peach
To: Lion's Cub
So the story breaks Friday, but the US media doesn't put it out until 5pm Saturday, when most people aren't watching news channels...
It could be because the story that broke on Friday doesn't say anything about "Iraq Six Months Away From Having Nuclear Weapon!" I clicked on FoxNews and there is currently no "Fox Alert" saying anything about Iraq being six months from having nukes. Perhaps Fox misread its own story and has now changed its headline, if the headline ever said this in the first place.
78
posted on
09/07/2002 2:25:28 PM PDT
by
drjimmy
To: PhilDragoo
Thanks for the link. Will just have to try it myself next time with directions in hand!
79
posted on
09/07/2002 2:25:54 PM PDT
by
Peach
To: Peach; All
Today's must read for interested Freepers - search for: Iraq - Scotsman says Saddam has weapons to wipe out world's population. The info is based on 10 Downing Street's dossier on Saddam. The dossier is detailed further down (around post #7).http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/746066/posts#16
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-179 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson