Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/07/2002 11:27:16 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Great Dane; liliana; Alberta's Child; Entropy Squared; Rightwing Canuck; Loyalist; canuckwest; ...
-
2 posted on 09/07/2002 11:27:41 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
What was it that OJ simpson pleaded, "Absolutely, positively, one hundred percent not guilty..."
3 posted on 09/07/2002 11:45:26 AM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Definitive proof will come only when a mushroom cloud rises above Tel Aviv or Washington. Do we wait until then, Mr. Chrétien?

Of course, he wants to wait until then. He's a socialist loser who believes in appeasement.

Did he argue against fellow Commonwealth leader Robert Mugabe?

Of course not. Chrétien is a worthless hand-wringer.

4 posted on 09/07/2002 11:50:41 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Definitive proof will come only when a mushroom cloud rises above Tel Aviv or Washington.

Or maybe Ottawa. . . unless Canadians think that they are somehow exempt from the threat just beacuse they are Canadians.

(Oh, and by the way, haven't terrorists been caught trying to sneak in to the US FROM CANADA? In cars loaded with EXPLOSIVES?)

(Oh, and also by the way. . . I wonder how absolutely, 100% reliable the control mechanisms would be on the nuclear device that Saddam built and gave to the terrorists to smuggle in through Canada? The one that couldn't be absolutely, 100% proven to exist?)

(Oh, and by the way, if I were a terrorist hiding out in Ottawa, and I had the bomb, and the RCMP were knocking on my door, and I had the codes to set off the device, I wonder what I would do?)

5 posted on 09/07/2002 12:02:13 PM PDT by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
"Definitive proof will come only when a mushroom cloud rises above Tel Aviv or Washington. Do we wait until then, Mr. Chrétien?:

Actually, I think the author has swerved into the truth here. Many of the liberals really don't give a rat's patootie about Israel, and would, in fact, be happy as clams if Israel gets nuked. That goes double for Washington.

6 posted on 09/07/2002 12:06:21 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
I am so sick of people who are perfectly willing to sacrifice American lives before they will "grant permission" for us to defend ourselves.

The UN has allowed itself to become a laughingstock by NOT backing up their demands and I'm sick of the US paying 25% of the tab for what has become nothing more than an exclusive club for despots and diviates who hide behind immunity, gorge themselves on rich foods and high living.

The UN has become a joke, and our allies are almost as laughable.

BTW, that security council veto goes both ways, if they won't stand behind us, I seriously doubt that we will be willing to expend either blood nor treasure on any further UN flights of fantesy. Let them raise taxes in their own countries.

7 posted on 09/07/2002 12:07:48 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
This is like when Clinton, the other day, said that Bush should defer going after Iraq until he got Bin Laden. Clinton knows Bin Laden is dead. Waiting until Bin Laden is captured befor going after Iraq is an impossible requirement.

-PJ

8 posted on 09/07/2002 12:10:42 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Someone asked Chretien what would be good enough proof, his reply, "Proof is when you prove something, so proof , good proof is proof." The man sounds like a complete idiot, should never be allowed out of his padded cell.
9 posted on 09/07/2002 12:25:32 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Definitive proof will come only when a mushroom cloud rises above Tel Aviv or Washington. Do we wait until then, Mr. Chrétien?

Well...

It would be proof.
Wouldn't it?

canuck logic?

11 posted on 09/07/2002 12:44:59 PM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
If you wait for proof, you're dead

Brilliant! This is the most succinct and compelling argument for attacking Iraq I have read yet.

15 posted on 09/07/2002 11:35:00 PM PDT by Genesis defender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
A nuclear-armed dictator could do endless damage, not just to the United States but to his Middle Eastern neighbours.

Such as -- to pick a name "completely at random" -- Pervez Musharraf?

Pakistan has the tested, ready-to-hurl nukes. Saudi Arabia has the bankroll for al-Qaida and has been using it. ... So we attack Iraq. Makes perfect sense!

Not.

16 posted on 09/08/2002 1:22:47 AM PDT by Greybird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson