Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The chickens have finally come home to roost! Superimposed socialist/EnvironMentalist anti-nuke and anti-dam ANTI-economic progress just doesn't work after all!!!
1 posted on 09/06/2002 7:35:43 AM PDT by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; snopercod; Robert357; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; farmfriend; Phil V.
A Nuclear wreckage Ping!!! The anti-nuke crowd scared the people of Sacramento with 3 Mile Island into decommissioning Rancho Seco. Now their solar system sucks canal water and they're soooooooo SHOCKED!!!
3 posted on 09/06/2002 7:40:48 AM PDT by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
Thats just crazy...30 to 40 MW of solar power...from what I have seen those panels must take up a ton of land, better yet, just build fast breader reactors, that way you can use nuclear waste as fuel thus killing 2 birds with 1 stone by making more electricity and depleting the tons of nuclear waste at the same time...it's win win...but the greenies will never figure that one out
4 posted on 09/06/2002 7:43:29 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
The same thing happend in the 80's and 90's with the re-cycling rage. (Remember the liberal teachers in the public school giving forms to fill out every week, ordering this)

It failed, went bankrupt, because it was just to expensive.

The public cannot afford some of these ideas right now, I'm sure it will get better in the future with more research, BY THE PRIVATE SECTOR.
5 posted on 09/06/2002 7:44:07 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
Reminds me of the book "From a life in the semester of a garbage bag":

..."Our son has obvioiusly lost direction, and we didn't even notice! Sean, I want you to admit right now, for good
and all, that there is nothing wrong with the Department of energy project in your school! SACGEN works perfectly!"
6 posted on 09/06/2002 7:46:14 AM PDT by brianl703
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
Anything done under communist Davis will fail, communist have always failed.
7 posted on 09/06/2002 7:47:11 AM PDT by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
Gee. I guess their name really iS M U D.
8 posted on 09/06/2002 7:47:57 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
"I served the district for better than a decade with honor, and I brought honor to the district and to Sacramento. We are at the forefront of the solar revolution," he said.

Honor would be if you made it work instead of bailing out for your own company.
9 posted on 09/06/2002 7:48:01 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
PUBLIC SECTOR SOLAR CAN'T REPLACE PRIVATE NUCLEAR OR HYDRO POWER!

Good, now scrap it, give the local taxpayers back some of their money, and let private business do it. Still don't think it would be profitable but at least businesses would realize that instead of the constant fleecing of the taxpayer

10 posted on 09/06/2002 7:49:26 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
The benefits of the solar program were double-counted in budgeting, making the program appear $1.9 million cheaper than it actually is.

Isn't this an example of what Democrats like to call "Enron style accounting"?

11 posted on 09/06/2002 7:53:01 AM PDT by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
One thing that really distinguishes the Sacramento area is that they have gobs of solar energy given to them by the sun, too. If they can't make solar power work there, it's doubtful that it's a viable enterprise at all.
12 posted on 09/06/2002 7:53:17 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
Solar power, wind power, light rail, recycling. When will they ever learn? Of course, these boondoggles keep many, many political hacks well employed, so maybe they have learned all they need to know - where the keys to the public purse are kept.
14 posted on 09/06/2002 7:58:31 AM PDT by Uncle Sausage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
I wouldn't mind being energy independent. But don't want my tax money being handed over to others as a free gift.
16 posted on 09/06/2002 7:59:15 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
WHAT!? are you telling me that these smug anti-estblishment tree huggers are really corporate swindlers, who cook the books for their own profit?... "say it aint so Joe". Where's Joe Loserman on this public scandle? I'll bet Al Gore won't be claiming the invention of the solar panel anytime soon.
17 posted on 09/06/2002 8:01:43 AM PDT by Rockiesrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
In the '70's it took more energy to produce
a PV panel than it could be expected to produce
in it's lifetime.
Anyone out there have more recent data??
18 posted on 09/06/2002 8:06:07 AM PDT by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
No problem. The libs will just pass legislation repealing the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
21 posted on 09/06/2002 8:09:10 AM PDT by PMCarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
With minor modifications, your headline becomes all-inclusive:

Public Sector X Can't Replace Private Y.

True in virtually every case, as long as X and Y are somewhat related.

23 posted on 09/06/2002 8:11:55 AM PDT by Andyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
This report is patently rediculous. Solar power very well could replace private nuclear or hydro power, damnit! Of course, it'd take something like 1000 square miles of (very expensive) panels to get the same amount of energy, but hey, who cares? As long as taxes and the price of energy goes up, the world will be a better place
24 posted on 09/06/2002 8:13:38 AM PDT by WindMinstrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
Any freshman engineering student knows that photovoltaic energy is a good economic choice where there is no other alternative. Even in space, nuclear is better.

All this program has done is to populate Sacramento with zillions of lead-acid batteries that need to be replaced every 5 years.

I am still a believer in solar hot water systems where the climate is right. It's the only alternative energy system out there that will - under the right circumstances - pay for itself in ten or twenty years.

25 posted on 09/06/2002 8:13:47 AM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
WHAT? No free energy?
26 posted on 09/06/2002 8:15:36 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
To hell with them all. They deserve their fate. Those idiots threw away over 900 MW of capacity in the Rancho Seco plant for no other reason than the whipped-up fear and hysteria of the sheeple driven by the anti-nook kooks. And in the process destroyed the lives and careers of many fine Rancho Seco employees and their families.

The kooks promised they'd replace the lost Rancho Seco capacity one household at a time, with solar panels. They lied. They failed. I say good, let them eat sunbeams, and sweat it out during the summer and freeze in the dark at night in the winter.

27 posted on 09/06/2002 8:21:25 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson