Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator: Bush will order iraq attack 'fairly soon', attack is 'immenent'
Fox News

Posted on 08/22/2002 2:20:58 PM PDT by StopDemocratsDotCom

Senator InHofe (R-OK): Bush will order iraq attack 'fairly soon', attack is 'immenent'.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-353 next last
To: crystalk
I don't think this would have been done unless the witching hour was on or before 9/11/02.

Hmmm. Could be. I am on record predicting a January offensive. In part because of logistics and in part because I expected that GW would have needed to go through some sort of coalition building exersize, first with the US Congress and then with our most important allies. This wouold have entailed the disclosure of a significant amount of intel, thus jeopardizing sources. This could have been minimized, as in the case of Afghanistan, if a few key allies agreed -- as The UK, France, and Germany finally did (to a degree) in the Afghanistan campaign. Going though a more elaborate presentation of the evidence, and acceptance by the Congress and others, could take some time, perhaps as much as 6-12 months. Therefore, for me, the prospect of a fall 2002 campaign is most surprising, but not impossible. My bet is still on psyops through November/December, and the hammer falls in January.

201 posted on 08/22/2002 8:14:25 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: andy_card
I think he "leaked" it on purpose.
202 posted on 08/22/2002 8:18:47 PM PDT by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Yeah, we're in the global system, courtesy of George W. Bush's New World Order.
203 posted on 08/22/2002 8:18:48 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: gunshy
I disagree. As in the past, our enemies are always wrong, and often stupid. Sometimes luck has favored us. But then, God is with us. Look at history. Are you saying that these islamist mongrels, who haven't invented anything for over a thousand years, who practically live a pre-historic existance (were it not for oil wealth and western technology) are not stupid? Giveth me a breaketh.
204 posted on 08/22/2002 8:21:07 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

Comment #205 Removed by Moderator

To: rintense
Col. Hackworth on FOX thinks the first week in October... one year after we hit Afghanistan. He did say he thinks it will come before the election.

I recall a promise from Bush that there will be no "October surprise". That would seem to make it either this September or Jan/Feb of next year.

206 posted on 08/22/2002 8:22:54 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk
Can you really trust Bush?
207 posted on 08/22/2002 8:23:20 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
If GOD were really with us, he would not have allowed 911 to happen.
208 posted on 08/22/2002 8:24:40 PM PDT by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Col. Hackworth on FOX thinks the first week in October... one year after we hit Afghanistan. He did say he thinks it will come before the election.

I like Hack. But he also said (in a radio interview of November 2001, KSFO San Francisco) that we would invade Iraq by Christmas 2001! Methinks that he sometimes speaks his heart instead of what he thinks/knows.

209 posted on 08/22/2002 8:27:21 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: gunshy
That wasn't necessary. FReepers don't need to call other FReepers stupid. Nothing you said in the post that made Conservobabe laugh was true, IMHO, which is probably why she was laughing.

Bush has been consistently addressing all the issues you say he has done "nothing" about. Bush means to effect a long-term, fundamental change in the balance of power in the ME, and he is going to do it, too. However, it is obviously nothing that can be accomplished in a few short months. For one thing, a substantial re-arming of our military forces is being done, and that takes time.

Bush's ME foreign policy will require a long-term effort, and it has already started with the events in Afghanistan. He has told us many times, in many speeches, that it will be a long haul. You are a tiresome, Bush basher.

210 posted on 08/22/2002 8:28:36 PM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: mercy
If Bush has the balls to attack Irac BEFORE the November elections I will take back AND apologise for every bad thing I have ever said about him.

You might want to get ready...[g]

Sharon Postpones Trip to U.S.

211 posted on 08/22/2002 8:29:22 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: gunshy
"If GOD were really with us, he would not have allowed 911 to happen."

You are wrong about that. You need to read "Why Bad Things Happen to Good People" written by a Rabbi some years ago. God does let bad things happen mostly because he wants us to work things out for ourselves. "Our ways are not God's ways.

212 posted on 08/22/2002 8:31:02 PM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: hoosierboy
I really respect Inhofe. Ever read his floor statement on China? He's never been afraid to speak his mind. A couple years ago he was flying his plane and the propeller fell off. He had to make an emergency landing at a nearby airport. The FBI was asked to investigate because "propellers don't just fall off." Hmm...
213 posted on 08/22/2002 8:31:21 PM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend; weikel
Good. I have the Senate bogged down in procedures. By the time this incident comes up for a vote, they will have no choice but to accept your control of the system. Iraq is sparsely populated. If the trace was correct, We will find them quickly.....

Move against the Republican Army first...you will then have no difficulty taking Saddam back to Baghdad, where he will sign the treaty.

"BEGIN LANDING YOUR TROOPS'

214 posted on 08/22/2002 8:32:18 PM PDT by Senator_Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: andy_card
In other words, he has access to a lot of sensitive material. This "leak" is definitely unethical, and, very possibly, illegal.

Leaking isn't done on TV. It's done by calls to the media. I wish we had more Inhofes and less Hagels, it would be a better party.

215 posted on 08/22/2002 8:35:45 PM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: section9
Coupled with Inhofe's remarks, which were planned, this is the most significant story of the day.

That Sharon would cancel an important visit, scheduled for early September, to an important segment of American Jewry during a period in which the Intifada is continuing should set off alarm bells all over the Middle East.

Good take. I have been thinking that a January strike, after some further coalition building, was the plan. But I've been starting to change my mind. Another point: What has VP Cheney been doing for the past few months? Been pretty low key. Perhaps he is seriously occupied. Could be you are right about the fall. God be with us and our brave military.

216 posted on 08/22/2002 8:36:29 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
True. Ya gotta love the guy's spirit! And that name... Hackworth... truly fitting of a Col.!
217 posted on 08/22/2002 8:39:20 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
How about November 1st? :)
218 posted on 08/22/2002 8:40:11 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Senator_Palpatine
My point is that there has to be a reasonable belief that Saddam has weapons of mass destruction and is intending to use them.

This is not something that you mosey into. This is serious stuff, and it will cost a lot of lives.

To me, the Saudis have harbored the terrorists, but for some reason we're going after Saddam first. I'll give you that he is not a nice guy. However, there has to be clear, observable evidence.

I wonder why so many of you think that it is okay for the U.S to invade another country without significant knowledge. On the other hand, if the U.S. were being attacked, you would think that is terrible. Again, I don't doubt that Saddam is a bad guy. Yet, I do not want the U.S. getting dragged into a long, casualty-filled war without significant evidence.

219 posted on 08/22/2002 8:41:40 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: andy_card
"This 'leak' is definitely unethical, and, very possibly, illegal."

On what do you base your assertion? Thin air?

220 posted on 08/22/2002 8:43:33 PM PDT by Chunga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-353 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson