Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Senator_Palpatine
My point is that there has to be a reasonable belief that Saddam has weapons of mass destruction and is intending to use them.

This is not something that you mosey into. This is serious stuff, and it will cost a lot of lives.

To me, the Saudis have harbored the terrorists, but for some reason we're going after Saddam first. I'll give you that he is not a nice guy. However, there has to be clear, observable evidence.

I wonder why so many of you think that it is okay for the U.S to invade another country without significant knowledge. On the other hand, if the U.S. were being attacked, you would think that is terrible. Again, I don't doubt that Saddam is a bad guy. Yet, I do not want the U.S. getting dragged into a long, casualty-filled war without significant evidence.

219 posted on 08/22/2002 8:41:40 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomFriend
the Saudis have harbored the terrorists, but for some reason we're going after Saddam first.

I wouldn't count on that being one hundred percent true...
252 posted on 08/22/2002 10:32:30 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson