[Physicist]

Your point makes my case against Libertarians and illegal drugs then.

If you're drunk, perhaps.

Russians overcame their supression,

Either you're saying that that means Stalin wasn't so bad, or you're pointing out that many Russians were as drunk as American drug warriors, I'm not sure which.

whereas the public at large in the USA approves of enforcement against those using illegal drugs and only the few Libertarian folks feel supressed.

So if the public is so overwhelmingly in favor of drug fascism, why not let the States decide for themselves? With 99% of the people <snicker> approving of the status quo, you should have no problem.

[bat-boy]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/737120/posts

So much for your 99% BS. You and your ilk are going down!! bwahahahahahaha

tick tock, tick tock, tick tock

[bat-boy]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/737120/posts

So much for your 99% BS. You and your ilk are going down!! bwahahahahahaha

tick tock, tick tock, tick tock

[bat-boy]

Sorry 'bout that. It was meant for A CA Guy, not you, although you may get a kick out of reading the article.

[A CA Guy]

I'm pointing out that Russia's people had good reason to change the way it was.
Americans in the great majority are against illegal drugs though.

What is drug fascism, or your definition of facism? Any law you disagree with?
Or perhaps drug fascism is trying to push the evils of illegal drugs on the community at large.