[PrairieDawg]

Per testimony: Westerfield's motorhome was unlocked often. You think the neighborhood kids wouldn't check it out? Especially a little girl that was used to being away from the parents (Brenda left Danielle in a changing room once to go to *another store*)?

Now, why couldn't the defense find a kid to say that they had been in the motorhome snooping around? Perhaps none of the parents would let their kids testify - especially on behalf of a man the SDPD had convinced them was a child molestor/murderer.

Let's assume that you're correct. Westerfield raped and then killed Danielle. Shouldn't there be more physical evidence than they found? There should be prints everywhere and DNA everywhere. They found 1 (ONE) fingerprint near a cabinet and a spot of DNA which may (or may not) have been blood.

You need to read the testimony. And by the way, Nancy Grace is the Court TV wench that has been calling for Westerfield's head since the beginning of the trial.

FRegards,
PrairieDawg

[lotus]

Has anyone brought up this about the girls diary?

If this is true then the father is my suspect....

[checkessential]

Per testimony: Westerfield's motorhome was unlocked often. You think the neighborhood kids wouldn't check it out?

Testimony was that the motorhome was in storage the previous month. Was NOT in the neighborhood for weeks. They not only found her blood, handprint, fiber but the hair they found was of the same length of DVD hair which had been cut a week before

They found 1 (ONE) fingerprint near a cabinet

Wrong again. They found a hand print upside down by the headboard. Also they found fibers from that headboard imbedded in the top of her skull. Now what do you think was going on. Bury your head in this one!

[been_lurking]

And by the way, Nancy Grace is the Court TV wench that has been calling for Westerfield's head since the beginning of the trial.

Based on the verdict, I guess she was right all along???

[agrandis]

I don't believe it's likely that Westerfield was the one who put the body where it was found. That's what bugs me about this whole thing.

My hunch is the following scenario: Westerfield molested the child with the sick "parent's" permission. He killed her, and they covered up their own crimes, which included dumping the body.

Whatever the scenario, something ain't right, based on the entomological data, and the fact that the crime was too clean in every way. Westerfield doesn't seem like a safe person to have in a neighborhood, but neither do the "parents."

[NautiNurse]

Shouldn't there be more physical evidence than they found? There should be prints everywhere and DNA everywhere.

Yes--including Westerfield's prints in his own motor home. Those were conspicuously missing as well.

Take some time and smell the bleach!