Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marajade
They why didn't Westerfield get on the stand and provide testimony to that effect? If that's all it would take to convince you he was innocent why didn't he do it for this jury?

I'm not in the least convinced that he's innocent. I just want to make certain that there'e logical evidence to convict him. I do not see it.

504 posted on 08/21/2002 12:35:01 PM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]


To: twigs
bump
524 posted on 08/21/2002 12:41:10 PM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]

To: twigs
The point is that YOU were not a part of the jury, so have nothing to back up your claim, except what you saw on TV.
The jury, on the other hand, was privy to all of the evidence, and came to the proper verdict.
555 posted on 08/21/2002 12:54:14 PM PDT by rstevens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson