Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: twigs
The point is that YOU were not a part of the jury, so have nothing to back up your claim, except what you saw on TV.
The jury, on the other hand, was privy to all of the evidence, and came to the proper verdict.
555 posted on 08/21/2002 12:54:14 PM PDT by rstevens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]


To: rstevens
The careful followers of the trial had more info than the jury, and access to video replays and written transcipts -- save in one area -- the overwhelmingly prejudicial porn charges. No experts in psychology or criminal habits testified as to how porn is linked to murder. The porn was used to emotionally charge the jury, against the already massive barrage of media spin against Westerfield.

The porn charges -- especially sans experts to testify as to weight in motive -- should have been a seperate proceeding, and not in the murder trial.

576 posted on 08/21/2002 1:09:05 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson