Skip to comments.
VAN DAM MURDER VERDICT [VERDICT IN: GUILTY!]
ABC radio
Posted on 08/21/2002 10:03:52 AM PDT by wallcrawlr
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 981-999 next last
To: crystalk; All
I thougth the bugs would make it a hung jury..
Don't forget the guy who studies mummys..
all, MUDD JUST SAID...if guilty, penality phase monday
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Court has started, no jury yet.
To: Peach
No evidence he was a pedophile.
No evidence anyone went through that door.
Even if they did, the doors between the house and garage were locked.
Where is the evidence anyone entered at all?
To: Steve0113; All
I said it appears he owned possessed child porn...
steve, all...Feldman just said they are waiting for a case outof state that has to do wtih this one. DO you know what he's talkinga bout?
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
No, sorry.
The anticipation is killing me.
To: Peach
no, crystalk is not a disruptor. You need to read the threads that have been running throughout this trial. They are an AMAZING thing to behold.
To: crystalk
Where is the evidence anyone entered at all? I dunno. Where's the evidence Bill Clinton ordered those E-mails destroyed?
168
posted on
08/21/2002 11:03:20 AM PDT
by
Coop
To: Travis McGee
It is chilling...I am praying for a guilty verdict
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I think they are talking about 10 out of state witnesses that the defense failed to submit as discovery to the state which is the law.
To: FreeTheHostages
Good analysis, my friend, It is worth noting that the judge in this case never had to read the "Allen Charge" to the jury. As you known, but others don't, when a jury indicates to the judge that it is having trouble reaching a unanimous result, it is permissiible for the judge to issue them the Allen Charge, which is telling them to "reexamine the evidence, consult with your fellow jurors, and seek to reach a unanimous verdict, if you can do so without violating your own conscience as a juror."
That charge is the last step before the judge declares a mistrial. That step was not reached nor was necessary in this trial. That, also, leads to the conclusion that this will be a guilty verdict.
Congressman Billybob
Click for latest column: "The Truth of a Gravel Road."
Click for latest book: "to Restore Trust in America"
To: nimc
i think it's the correct verdict... guilty.
To: small voice in the wilderness
They are an AMAZING thing to behold. Amazing for the ad nauseum repetition and the degree to which these people have dedicated their entire lives to one trial.
To: crystalk
If I were on the jury, I would acquit the innocent ones like this, but would be just as vicious on the guilty ones as you want to be here.Me? Read my post and say that again.
For someone making a claim to extraordinary insightful perception, you point that finger of yours rather carelessly...
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
You don't suppose the Florida girl...
To: Coop
I dunno. Where's the evidence Bill Clinton ordered those E-mails destroyed? Oooh, great argument. Bill Clinton was scum, and a criminal President. Therefore we should convict David Westerfield of murder.
Care to mention O.J. too?
Drew Garrett
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs; All
jury to be there in 10 minutes
Judge mudd gave prosecution permission to speak to the parents first.
To: newgeezer
posted to you in error, sorry.
To: crystalk
If Monica had destroyed her dress would you still have believed that Clinton ejaculated on it?
To: crystalk
Which one crys? DO you mean calif girl?
see post by marajade above about 10 witnesses,,
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 981-999 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson