[Red Jones]

let's destroy the lies that pervade our nation concerning so many scandals and issues.

[steve50]

Interesting. We'll see if Ted will go to the wall to protect the last administration. My guess is yes.

[Incorrigible]

Clinton Body Count bump!

[thinden]

At issue is the question of whether Foster had neck wound instead of the official version that it was a mouth to back of head wound. It is reported that a photo exists that depicts the neck wound.

perhaps, park police officer kevin forshill can shed some light on the issue. he was one of the 1st to arrive at the death scene. kevin used to FReep from time to time, but don't know if he's around anymore.

[Fred Mertz]

In Barbara's last book, she seemed to back off using the word suicide when referring to Vince Foster's death. Perhaps Ted will look into the matter to find the truth.

We can always hope for Ted to do the right thing, but I'm very doubtful he will.

[AdA$tra]

Time to clear the air: I killed Vince Foster. OK, so not really, but I was in the area when it happened. That was weird enough for me. My guess is that this will fall under the category of all the other Klinton krimewave stuuf being swept under the rug by this administration. Gotta be the FBI files or maybe just the quiet "I don't see any benefit to this story" conspiracy that exists in Washintoon.

[Inspector Harry Callahan]

bttt

[backhoe]

The Lonely Death of Vince Foster-- Case Unclosed?

[getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL]

Barbara Olsen was a FReeper? This is a little off-topic, but she was mentioned in the article.

She was my hero in politics, and in the world in general. I grieve still, when I see her name mentioned anywhere, and the tears still come. I can't imagine how awfully hard it has to have been for Ted Olsen. If Barbara Olsen is your spouse, how would one even imagine that void could be filled? She was the most electric & beautiful person I've ever seen.

[AnnaZ]

VINCE FOSTER - The Mirage of Suicide and The Reality of Murder

[GBA]

I hope that this case gets the respect it deserves. There are too many conspiracies, too many lies, and too little trust in our government to search for the truth and not cave in to political pressure and corruption. This is a chance to restore some measure of credibility. That journey's first step needs to be taken and it could be taken with the Foster case. Do the investigation and release the data. Let's finally get to the truth.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

Wow! Someone has been busy! And photos from one of the pages.... Here. Glad to see the Cause continues. Does my heart good.

[Pagey]

I don't believe he'll do anything about this at all except brush it aside.No offense to Ted either, it's just that I don't believe he wants another 'major interruption' to happen in his life.On the other hand,because his wife died because of #42's lack of action---you'd think he'd want do something.I wholly doubt it though.This can of worms is 'Too Large',even for him.God bless Barbara Olsen again.

[Plummz]

Perhaps Ted will look into the matter to find the truth.

Nice thought, but nothing to put money on.

[mrsmith]

DOJ's side

"The Ninth Circuit in Favish, in attempting to balance the interests involved in nine photographs of the scene of Deputy White House Counsel Vincent Foster's suicide, remanded the case to the district court for it to view the photographs in camera (34) -- doing so even though those very photographs had been held to be protected by Exemption 7(C) in a previous case. (35) The district court on remand, following the Ninth Circuit's instructions, evaluated the family's privacy interests by employing an incorrect tort law standard -- i.e., whether the photographs were "'graphic, explicit, or extremely upsetting.'" (36)
Further, in analyzing the public interest in disclosure in Favish, the Ninth Circuit purported to follow Reporters Committee, yet based its finding of public interest in disclosure of the photographs merely upon plaintiff's "doubts" regarding the adequacy of the government's investigation into the suicide. (37) This departs radically from the narrow definition of public interest set forth in Reporters Committee. (38) This departure was compounded further when, on remand, the district court failed to employ the proper public interest standard -- i.e., whether disclosure of the photographs would shed light on the operations of the government -- and instead employed a more general, and unorthodox, public interest standard: Are the photographs "probative of the public's right to know?" "

[gunshy]

The truth, as it relates to the federal government, will never see the light of day.

[Samizdat]

bump