Posted on 08/20/2002 4:22:40 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
Wait, wait, don't tell me, it's the NRA's fault, right?
But the question is never asked... why is it of such great importance that many people give it more weight than any other aspect of schooling? No one gives it more weight. The argument is that home schooling does not provide any socialization because it is an individual rather than collective experience.
If we look at the meaning of the word, we find two branches, one of which is that of making a person fit to deal with others, that is, giving him certain inhibitions and a rudimentary stock of manners, so that he will not offend other people. The other meaning of "socialize" is to organize or form in accordance with the principles and aims of socialism. No! Only when specifically referred to the means of production.
Instead of a father passing on to his son the traditions and customs of his country, we have teachers training children in the same way that a master trains his dog. Even if this were true, this is an argument against the current state of public education, not public education as a form.
More importantly, there has never existed a school that had more influence on the child than family. The only reason that the issue even exists is that parents in America have abrogated their parental duties. It is into this parenting vacuum that other ideologies step in. The author should complain why our churches and synagogues are not keeping up with the times to provide effective guidance to children and parents.
This author should read more before he starts writing.
"But everbody else was doing it!"
Most people have no idea who created and maintains our indoctrination system, and why.
Big time disagreement here. Being in the middle of peer pressure doesn't help you deal with peer pressure - being removed from a non-stop force-fed diet of peer pressure during the years when you actually give a shit what your peers think and do is the best antidote. When my homeschooled kids, who by the way know about drugs and the losers who use them, leave home for college or whatever, that window of ultra vulnerability known as the teen years will be fading away and they will be YOUNG ADULTS who have bypassed - and therefore never developed an attachment to - the opinions of their same-age peers. They have spent their young lives trying to get the attention and approval of the MATURE people in their lives. That's not to say they don't have friends they like and want to be like - they do. But it's a far smaller influence than it would be were they in school. When it's time for them to fly I doubt very much that they will regress into adolescence; it will hold no attractions for them.
Originally the word liberal meant social conservatives(no govt religion--none) who advocated growth and progress---mostly technological(knowledge being absolute/unchanging)based on law--reality... UNDER GOD---the nature of GOD/man/govt. does not change. These were the Classical liberals...founding fathers-PRINCIPLES---stable/SANE scientific reality/society---industrial progress...moral/social character-values(private/personal) GROWTH(limited NON-intrusive PC Govt/religion---schools)!
Evolution...Atheism-dehumanism---TYRANNY...
Then came the SPLIT SCHIZOPHRENIA/ZOMBIE/BRAVE-NWO America---
Lizavetta: "force-fed diet of peer pressure during the years when you actually give a shit what your peers think and do is the best antidote..."
What a language, Lizavetta! I guess all us do succumb to environment a little bit.
There is no other time in their lives when they will be FORCED to socialize only with their peers. Schools are a very artificial atmosphere; when they leave secondary school and go to college, they will be in classes with folks of different ages and will be CHOOSING with whom they will socialize on a regular basis. It may be other students their own age, or those who are older.
When they go out into the work world, they will have to deal with people of ALL ages, and if they've already learned how to do that while being homeschooled, they they will be that much farther ahead than their 'schooled' peers.
no one refers to schooling as socialization
She thought of socialization as the prime purpose of government schooling, so "no one" seems a bit extreme to me.
There is no other time in their lives when they will be FORCED to socialize only with their peers. Not true. Most universities deliberately pair very different people as roommates, precisely for that reason. If some one joins the military, he or she "will be FORCED to socialize only with" peers. When, after college, one joins the work force, one ineracts most of the time with peers. Schools are a very artificial atmosphere; So is a corporation. And the army. How about beeing bunched togetehr with a 1,000 guys on a navy ship? Do oil rigs come to mind? How about driving a truck with another person, suck in a cabin for a week --- is that natural?
when they leave secondary school and go to college, they will be in classes with folks of different ages and will be CHOOSING with whom they will socialize on a regular basis. Now you hit the nail on the head! For someone to choose, that person must know what he or she prefers. Should I prefere people who read a lot, I will choose in my environment the most well-read people; if, however, I prefer tennis players, I will choose such from my environment.
Life, however, involves several processes: learning what is available, that is the full spectrum of possibilities; deciding what you prefer among them; and, finding that which satisfies your prefernces. For instance, in chooosing a field, one answers the questions: (i) what professions do exist out there? (ii) which of these would I like to persue? (iii) in which company will I be most happy as a worker in the chosen profession?
As you can see, you have addressed only one of these. The proponents suggest, that the person first needs to go to stage one and see ALL kinds of people around him. That teaches him about the REALITY of what the world is. Observe that you do not have a different opinion about that --- in your post you did not even mention the other two stages, as if they do not exist.
Then came the SPLIT SCHIZOPHRENIA/ZOMBIE/BRAVE-NWO Soviet-LIBERAL-Socialist America...
the post-modern age of switch-flip-spin-DEFORMITY-cancer...
Atheist secular materialists through ATHEISM/evolution CHANGED-REMOVED the foundations---demolished the wall(separation of state/religion)--trampled the TRUTH-GOD...
built a satanic temple/SWAMP-MALARIA/RELIGION(cult of darwin-marx-satan) over them---made these absolutes subordinate--relative and calling/CHANGING all the... residuals(technology/science) === TO evolution via schlock/sMUCK IDEOLOGY/lies/bias...
to substantiate/justify their efforts--claims...social engineering--PC--atheism...
anti-God/Truth RELIGION(USSC monopoly)--and declared a crusade/WAR--JIHAD--INTOLERANCE/TYRANNY(breaking the establishment clause)...
against(NEA-devilcrats--witch hunt/vetters) God--man--society/SCIENCE!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.