Posted on 08/19/2002 3:31:29 PM PDT by Ranger
Monday, 19 August, 2002, 11:36 GMT 12:36 UK
Assuming the court proceeds with this lawsuit, the Saudi investment community, already in shock, will start withdrawing their money
|
Bishr Bakheet
Bakheet Financial Consultancy |
"This is an act to extort Saudi money deposited in the US and a way of meddling in the region," an official at Al-Rajhi Investment and Development Corp, one of the Saudi banks named in the lawsuit, told the Reuters news agency.
Relatives of about 900 people killed in the attacks filed a civil suit in a Washington court last Thursday seeking damages of over $1 trillion.
It accused three senior Saudi princes - including Defence Minister Prince Sultan, the kingdom's third highest official - several Saudi and other foreign banks, and Sudan's government of funding Osama bin Laden.
Pull-out threat
"Naming Prince Sultan is the equivalent of saying J. Edgar Hoover was a communist spy," said economist Bishr Bakheet of the Bakheet Financial Consultancy.
"Assuming the court proceeds with this lawsuit, the Saudi investment community, already in shock, will start withdrawing their money. People are really going to walk out," he said.
Dr Abd-al-Rahman al-Zamil, chairman of Al-Zamil Group, has urged Saudi investors to repatriate their funds to the kingdom, Saudi newspaper Arab News reported.
Riyadh has yet to officially comment on the lawsuit.
A Sudanese government minister also dismissed allegations that Khartoum had funded Osama bin Laden, the Saudi-born dissident Washington says masterminded the 11 September attacks.
Zero error
The lawsuit originally sought $100 trillion in damages but the lawyer for the victims late on Friday amend the suit to $1 trillion.
"I don't know how $100 trillion got in there. Somebody probably typed it at four o'clock in the morning," lawyer Ron Motley told the AP.
Mr Motley said the $1 trillion plus damages claim was calculated by multiplying the number of plaintiffs by the average award of $30m in such cases and then again by three.
He cited a federal law which says that damages can be tripled for victims of terrorist crimes.
Saudi-US strains
Fifteen of the 19 September 11 hijackers have been identified as Saudi, but the country's government has repeatedly stressed they were not involved in the attacks.
The lawsuit alleges Saudi money has "for years been funnelled to encourage radical anti-Americanism as well as to fund the al Qaeda terrorists".
Riyadh's refusal to allow the US to use its territory to attack Iraq and repeated criticism of pro-Israel US bias have strained relations between the oil superpower and Washington.
No, because the victims who get the money have to invest it somewhere...
They pull out fast, it gives us Joe Schmoes a buying opportunity for some of their good investments.
It will also sink some of their unwise investments (that I never considered investing in) like AOL, Citicorp, etc.
Fools and their money are some party, as my Daddy always said.
All I can say is, Go Get 'Em Plaintiff's Bar!!!!
CIA -- The World Factbook -- Saudi Arabia
GDP: purchasing power parity - $232 billion (2000 est.)
CIA -- The World Factbook -- United States
GDP: purchasing power parity - $9.963 trillion (2000 est.)
And you're a sucker because you actually believe that the Saudis are going to do this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.