RASH OF KIDNAPPINGS The Bitter Fruit of the Homosexual Agenda

Quite simply put, "God made Adam and Eve...not Adam and Steve."

Whos propaganda should I start with? Goebels had some good stuff.

Stop it with the impersonations will ya. If you can't distinguish between propaganda and scientific evidence I can't help you with that.

Atheists love to hang their hat on Jefferson but even he insisted that man's perception of his natural rights having been devinely gifted was pivotal.

So Jefferson was not a card carrying Christian. So what? Lots of other Founding Fathers were. Religion is the most powerful and efficacious promulgator of morality. The modern day effort of the Libertarians to supplant religious morality with human reason is a weak effort and the reason they are an insignificant blip on the political landscape.

So which science will it be? The science the nazis used, or the science the soviets used?

As explained here. Look up some of these words if their meaning eludes you.... the same guy whose quote appears above here probably wrote and first published your dictionary.

You're reificating. You can look that up in his dictionary if you don't know what that means. Noah Webster's quote is his own opinion. But, it has no basis in fact.

Of course, since you have no arguments, because you have no facts, you didn't address anything else in my post. Typical.

Atheists love to hang their hat on Jefferson but even he insisted that man's perception of his natural rights having been devinely gifted was pivotal.

That man is not the origin of rights is the point, not that they came from a supreme being. In the Old World the conventional wisdom held that rights came from the King. The notion that all men were created equal and that rights were an inherent part of being human came along later.

So Jefferson was not a card carrying Christian. So what? Lots of other Founding Fathers were.

And many weren't. But, wether they were or weren't isn't particularly relevant.

Religion is the most powerful and efficacious promulgator of morality.

Especially when people are told they're going to burn in Hell for eternity if they don't behave.

The modern day effort of the Libertarians to supplant religious morality with human reason is a weak effort...

Man has no other means at his disposal for discerning reality than the application of reason to his surroundings.

And for the record, Libertarians do not object to people using their religious beliefs as a moral guide if it pleases them to do so. What Libertarians object to are religious fanatics endeavoring to use the coercive force of government to impose those beliefs on others.

WOW.........way to go.....past 500 posts now! hehe

Pretty good for an opinion piece....it's amazing how much one thread can grow, if someone just so happens to hit a nerve at the right time..........

**** What Libertarians object to are religious fanatics endeavoring to use the coercive force of government to impose those beliefs on others.****

In many cases I agree. Libertarianism is woven into the fabric of American society (not by that name however). But so is the Judeo-Christian ethic. In most cases the fabric has held up pretty well.

But several times the moralists have gotten the upper hand and run amuck. These instances were regretable ... and produced lasting damage. At other times wild moral abandon has taken flight and caused problems as well.

Actually I don't think there have been many years running when this fabric has been unstressed from one side or the other. But it has never really torn. We're still America and we are still more free than oppressed.

But how much longer will we successfully tread the balance? Libertarians, possesed of the idea that man is evolving, becoming more aware and wise, wish to cut loose the bonds of moralistic thinking and, for one, end the war on drugs.

A noble idea in a funny sort of way. We ought to be able to end it. To decriminalize drugs. But I firmly believe to do so would mean a headlong plunge into oblivion. Despite all the info out there ... all of the baby boomers who nibled close to the hook and got away with it .... while many of their friends ruined their lives and even died from drug abuse .... we have not been all that successful at informing the following generations on the dangers of drugs.

Even with all the carnage surrounding drugs AND severe criminal penalties for those who traffic ... we still have millions of kids too stupid to fear playing with death.

That's just how disfunctional Western Society has become. We are extremely vulnerable and I believe closer to colapse than anybody wants to admit.

We have reached this state because for a very long time now ... around 40 years .... ( a substantial percentage of our societal existence ) we have been on a 'do your own thing' jag. We are extremely out of balance.

So the Libertarians think the world woudl be a better place if we legalized drugs. This to me is a perfect example of how wrong headed and unrealistic is the philosophy of Libertarianism.

Spoiled, illeducated, selfish American children will go hog wild on legal drugs and this entire naiton will go up in smoke.

I appreciate the thoughtful response but obviously disagree with it. The unintended consequences of the WOD are destroying this country, not the drugs. End the WOD and you end the violence and corruption which it has proliferated.

"He studied 199 cases. Of those, 122 male teachers had molested girls, while 14 female teachers had molested boys. He also discovered that 59 homosexual male teachers had molested boys and four female homosexual teachers had molested girls. In other words, 32 percent of those child molestation cases involved homosexuals. Nearly a third of these cases come from only 1-2% of the population."

Bogus findings, the one thing that this fails to take into consideration (the one thing it has to hide to make the numbers work the way they want them to) is the fact that 100% of the people are sexual deviants who molest children, molesting them according to their own particular sexual preference, this makes the study not indicative of the population in general.

Actually, it's not that impressive when you consider that 453 of the posts were made by two morons... the author and his primary antagonist. :-)

Also sprache OWK, the human whoopee cushion.

In my mind's eye I thought I saw you pack up your pathetic kitbag of insults, sniff derisively in your cute "all-knowing" fashion, and trundle off for dimmer horizons in that great atheist cauldron of heat death, mindlessness, and endless entropy.

One could hope, anyway.

But, no, you're still here pretending to be a conservative while every post you spit forth repudiates the essential moral core of conservatism.

It's actually 20% according to a gay publication. 2%=20%

"Gay" publications always fudge the % up to support their agenda. You can't trust any statistics you read in a "gay" publication.

2%-4% seems to be a consensus when dealing with actual statistical data. And no, I won't post any proof here, not worth the trouble. But you have the entire internet to verify the #s. Might I suggest the AMA and APA websites to start.

Stay away from "gay" publications or you'll get skewed data.

Please visit Christins No Longer Gay Living For God Internet Outreach at http://cnlglfg.com

The only rights homosexuals have is to repent or not go to heaven.

Christians No Longer Gay Living For God http://cnlglfg.com