Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP - Sen. Clinton preparing for potential presidential race
Associated Press ^ | Friday, August 16, 2002

Posted on 08/16/2002 9:09:02 PM PDT by HAL9000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last
To: HAL9000
I know he's gotten rather RINO over the years, but I pray that Pataki challenges Hillary in 2006. If she loses her Senate seat she is done.
61 posted on 08/16/2002 10:35:02 PM PDT by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
I'm thinking she will run in 2004 .. 2008 is too far away .. she'll be what .. 62 years old .. aging doesn't agree with her .. besides she wants it NOW!!

Why else are they building her image up now

Watch the news regarding the other canidates .. one by one she will pick them off with the help of either the NYT or the Enquire
62 posted on 08/16/2002 10:38:58 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
When the Democrats win the presidency, they do so with a candidate who is new and not deeply familiar to much of the country. Thus they can lie and receive the benefit of the doubt when the lies don't fit with their past records.

You know, I never heard or thought of that one before and it seems so true.

Who was the last "known" Dem elected President? Kennedy? and before that? Truman? Of course that doesn't count Clinton's re-election.

63 posted on 08/16/2002 10:39:42 PM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Hillary will be recognized as the brains behind the "Bent One"

Hilda wears the pants in that family .. Bill is there for the parties ..

She is one dangerous women and don't EVER turn your back on her ..

64 posted on 08/16/2002 10:42:11 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
[you really think that Hillary would do better than Gore in New Mexico or Wisconsin or Washington or Oregon?]

Washington and Oregon? Yup. The 2000 election/tossup was balanced on a dime. I wouldn't want to bet.

A recent NY poll showed an 89% disapproval fo a Hitlery run for President in 2004. But grifters like her (and her "husband") know full well that, given enough time, media spinning, voter fraud, and ignorance/apathy of the sheeple, ANYTHING is possible. Including taking Washington, Oregon, and New York. As well as California, Illinois, and Florida. It's the agenda, stupid. Be afraid. Be VERY afraid.

65 posted on 08/16/2002 10:42:30 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
You--must--be--accurately--when you are speaking to-- General Hillary Arafat! ByeBye!

LOL!!!!!!

66 posted on 08/16/2002 10:45:20 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
She has 30% locked up now--the brain-dead democrap party serfs.

Abso-freaking-lutely!

67 posted on 08/16/2002 10:47:50 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
It's the agenda, stupid. Be afraid. Be VERY afraid.

You got that right

68 posted on 08/16/2002 10:56:25 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Will President Hillary bring the stuff that she stole back?
69 posted on 08/16/2002 11:03:37 PM PDT by afuturegovernor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
What you say is all too true.
70 posted on 08/16/2002 11:03:49 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
What I find amazing is this witch doesn't realize just how much people hate her .

I asked my liberal family and friends if they would vote for her and their response was .. HELL NO!!

I've spent most of my life in NY and to this day I can't find anyone who'll actually say they voted for her. As hated as she is, don't underestimate the numbers of dead people, illegal /undocumented aleins and felons who will turn out and vote early and often for her. As others have said:

Underestimating Hillary ==> President Hillary

71 posted on 08/16/2002 11:05:12 PM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: YankeeReb
As hated as she is, don't underestimate the numbers of dead people, illegal /undocumented aleins and felons who will turn out and vote early and often for her. As others have said:

I'm from Philly where lots of dead voters live .. heck they even vote in alphabetical order too

72 posted on 08/16/2002 11:07:20 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Just like Bubba, she is going to pretend to be a moderate RAT, worked for him, so she figures it will work for her. And it will, although she is far left of left, and speaks with a Russian accent, RATS will fall for it with the help of her buddies in the media!
73 posted on 08/16/2002 11:08:08 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
IMHO Hillary is a Natural Born Loser. She has no chance of holding another elected position in our Government. She will not run in 2004 and she will not be re-elcted to the Senate in 2006. I say this because I believe by the time all these scandals are investigated we will see who was asleep at the wheel while the CEO's of Clinton's Corperate Cash Cows were cooking the books. The people who lost the most from these scandals are the ones who usually vote for Democrats. These are also the same people who the RATS want to keep in poverty as they promise to re-distribute the income of the most successful among us.

A Capitalistic Society can never survive if the most produtive among us are penalized for their productivity. The key to our survival is rewarding excellence. When we stop rewarding excellence with the programs the Liberals champion Like..(Outcome Based Education) and the many other PC nonsense they promote in order to insure they have an un-educated community to rely on for their voting base.

74 posted on 08/16/2002 11:22:05 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Hillary carries way too much baggage, and its not just around the hips.
75 posted on 08/16/2002 11:31:16 PM PDT by Russell Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russell Scott
There is still a Grand Jury in New York that is supposedly investigating the Pardons for Sale scandal. That has to be a big factor in her decision to wait until 2008.

On the other hand, this article could be a trial balloon to see if a Draft Hillary movement can get her in the race in 2004.

76 posted on 08/16/2002 11:54:07 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
There's no "IF's" about it....being president of the US has always been the target of this skank. That's the only reason she suffered Bill Clinton lo these many years...and now she wants some payback.

The most dangerous thing about this woman is not that she is a socialist pig....it's that every single idea she ever had was stupid.

77 posted on 08/17/2002 12:41:39 AM PDT by JessicaDragonet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Excellent analysis. Hitlery could never win unless the GOP ran Bozo the Clown against her. You are right, they must always sneak in an "unknown evil".
78 posted on 08/17/2002 3:36:33 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; McLynnan; PhilDragoo; MeeknMing; All
Excellent summation, Phil D, of the Hildebeast's complicity in criminality. You are quite right - TELL LIES FOR POWER. CHEAT FOR POWER. STEAL FOR POWER. USE BRIVERY FOR POWER. USE INTIMIDATION FOR POWER. KILL FOR POWER. DO WHATEVER IT TAKES FOR POWER.

Hilda Mugabe Stalin Clinton is lusting after power - has sold her soul for power - is headed to hell because of the consuming desire for power that saturates her heart, mind, and soul. On her way to hell, she intends to take America with her....just as her hero, Stalin, did (to his nation and the nations he controlled) before her.

Do you think she cares ONE IOTA about the "common people" and their opinion of her?

She does not.

Did Stalin? Did Hitler? Did Pol Pot?

Do you think she intends to take power, by whatever means necessary?

SHE ALREADY HAS! She is running the Senate. She through her leftover "moles" in every executive branch agency, is dominating what is going on even there despite President Bush's election. EVERY Executive Branch agency is infiltrated with Hillary's communist spies and agents. She is in control of and directing the DNC and McAwful. She is in control of and directing all of the Demonazi Propaganda outlets - you know which ones they are. She is in control of and directing her friends in academia and in the international criminal/terrorist community.

We must understand something clearly here.

She intends to be in FULL POWER over us - whether we like it or not. SHE COULD CARE LESS.

I continue to put money on this scenario:

Edwards - P / Hillary VP in 2004 because Edwards is such a pretty face and has the Southern Charm of Bill.

Hillary will be gushed over for stepping aside to allow Edwards (who is much more popular) to run as P.

ONce in office, some terrible thing will happen to Edwards - either from a "natural" disaster or something attributed to terrorists - and the "grieving" nation will turn to Hitlery.

And she, of course, will take control gladly---thereby avoiding the nasty situation of having to be "voted" into power.....something she could never do...not legally anyway.

This is her plan. Ignore whatever she is saying. YOU never pay attention to what communists say. YOU only pay attention to what they do. THE DNC, the MEDIA OUTLETS, and HLLARY are PUMPING EDWARDS. That would not be happening unless they are fully supporting him to run in 2004.

They are. She is. For a reason. Just as she used Bill to take power in 1992, she plans to use Edwards to take power in 2004.

Yes, of course, there is President Bush and millions of people who support him and will fight to the death to oppose her. But that is NOTHING TO A TOTALITARIAN!

79 posted on 08/17/2002 5:46:38 AM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
. LBJ in 1964 doesn't quite fit the scenario

LBJ won by saying he would end the was in Vietnam. He lied.

80 posted on 08/17/2002 5:55:02 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson