[DoughtyOne]

On the surface some are going to dump on this idea based on perceptions of administrative ability. Let's just say this about that. INS leadership has been noted for nothing if not the single most important department failure that has occured in this nation's history. As such, do we want a subordinate of the last leadership to take over? HELL NO! I support you nomination. Who could do worse than the existing long term management that had so-called management expertise. We need new blood, someone who has an open mind and rock solid common sense. Install her yesterday...

[Sabertooth]

We need new blood, someone who has an open mind and rock solid common sense. Install her yesterday...

Thanks, D1.

I've seen Tancredo and Buchanan mentioned on other threads. There's no way Bush nominates either of those guys, and no way either would make it out of committee if he did.

While Michelle Malkin may be a bit of a longshot, let's rattle some cages and see if we can get a pundit or politician or three to pick up this ball and run with it. There is no downside to getting her name into circulation.

Our opportunity is now.

[Brownie74]

We need new blood, someone who has an open mind and rock solid common sense. Install her yesterday...

I couldn't agree more. We definately need some new blood in Washington. Sign me up!!

I just received my email alert from Numbers USA.

Adios Ziggy!!

[Snow Bunny]

Thanks Saber for the thread and ping! I agree with you. An will add an ASAP to it too.