You obviously didn't read it. The meeting was never "denied". The Czechs have maintained from the gitgo that Atta met al Ani in Prague in April of 2001 and all the wishing in the world isn't going to change that fact. al Ani was expelled shortly afterward.
Whats obscene to me is your willingness to simply avoid truth because it conflicts with your opinion of what Bush should do.
Why did Atta fly to Prague, risking discovery of the most horrendous terroist act ever, to meet with al Ani and then return the next day? Give me a rational explanantion for that and you will have done what nobody else has been able to.
But - hey- let's forget the mountains of evidence that point to factions within Saudi Arabia and Eygpt and go after the boogeyman that is popular in the American beer swilling moron mind- even though his regime is diametrically opposed and threatened by and hated by the same Islamo fascists that crashed three planes into our soul on 9/11. What I find obscene is your willingness to ignore this and go after the wrong man and wrong country.
You want me to support a war? I support a war against Saudi Arabia, Eygpt and Syria before Iraq. To see one soldier die fighting Iraq in the name of 9/11 will be a lie.
Perhaps you can explain why Atta would share the details of a top-secret terrorist act with an Iraqi government when he did not need his support.