[Burkeman1]

Risk exposure? Are you kidding? He was sent a form to renew his Visa four months after 9/11 in this country! As for the machinations of how that meeting came to the surface I just laugh. The Czech handling of the release on news of this "meeting" is dubious at best and I would say down right suspicious.

But - hey- let's forget the mountains of evidence that point to factions within Saudi Arabia and Eygpt and go after the boogeyman that is popular in the American beer swilling moron mind- even though his regime is diametrically opposed and threatened by and hated by the same Islamo fascists that crashed three planes into our soul on 9/11. What I find obscene is your willingness to ignore this and go after the wrong man and wrong country.

You want me to support a war? I support a war against Saudi Arabia, Eygpt and Syria before Iraq. To see one soldier die fighting Iraq in the name of 9/11 will be a lie.

[EternalHope]

I support a war against Saudi Arabia, Eygpt and Syria before Iraq.

We may get a war against all of 'em before this is over. But only Iraq has weapons of mass destruction (including anthrax, at a minimum).

Do you think Saddam would use anthrax against us if he could?

If so, do you believe we would be justified in a pre-emptive attack, hoping to head off an attack on us that had not happened yet?

Just curious.