If it were the Board's stated intent to present "Intelligent Design" along with "Evolution" in order to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ, they would be in violation of the establishment clause - according to the previous Supreme Court rulings.
If they do not state an intention, we cannot read their minds and thus cannot infer the intent - and there would be no conflict with the establishment clause.
My two cents...
If they do not state an intention, we cannot read their minds and thus cannot infer the intent - and there would be no conflict with the establishment clause. My two cents...
Would you extend this gracious exception to others whose intents are never spoken, but whose desire is clearly evident?
An example: Homsexuality